this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2024
260 points (98.9% liked)
HistoryPorn
4917 readers
119 users here now
If you would like to become a mod in this community, kindly PM the mod.
Relive the Past in Jaw-Dropping Detail!
HistoryPorn is for photographs (or, if it can be found, film) of the past, recent or distant! Give us a little snapshot of history!
Rules
- Be respectful and inclusive.
- No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
- Engage in constructive discussions.
- Share relevant content.
- Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
- Use appropriate language and tone.
- Report violations.
- Foster a continuous learning environment.
- No genocide or atrocity denialism.
Pictures of old artifacts and museum pieces should go to History Artifacts
Illustrations and paintings should go to History Drawings
Related Communities:
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
The third sticks make it special...
Kickstand for your stilts!
This is not accurate. The stilts helped the shepherds avoid cracks, which would break their mother's backs.
This doesn't make sense.
I presume it's because getting up to your shins in mud makes it hard to draw your leg back out, whereas on stilts all your muscles and joints are above the stilt platform, allowing you to use them freely to draw the stilts out of troublesome terrain. That's just a guess though.
Yes, and the thinness and smoothness of the stilts allows them to slide easily out of muck whereas legs with boots and clothes on them get stuck rather easily!
Doesn't it also allow them to slide deeper in the muck than feet ever would? I'd think it would be better to wear something like snowshoes, yet here I am, looking at the picture and wondering.
I work in a salt marshes and traverse mud flats regularly, your take is correct, stilts could slide too deep and be exceedingly difficult to retrieve. This is a general statement YMMV (your marsh may vary) Stilts could potentially sink so deep as to exceed the legs range of motion and be impossible to extract, especially if both stilts sink in. Look at the feet of birds who live in marshes, they have oversized feet (like, as you said, snowshoes) to stay on top, avoid sinking in. Stilts advantage would allow seeing further in flat terrain.
Yeah it definitely would slide in deeper! I think that’s why they have 2 stilts for their feet plus an extra stick. In the picture they’re using the 3rd stick to form a tripod so they can rest but I imagine when walking they’ll use it to poke at the ground to make sure the muck isn’t too deep!
I thought it was gonna be German Shepards on stilts and I'm very disappointed.
It is not really to cross marshy ground but more to spot it and avoid it.
It also helps to keep an eye on all the sheep despite all the tall grass around them.
I haven't seen this mentioned enough. If you're job is to move and protect your flock then being high up and able to see further helps a lot.
Why don't the sheep and dogs have any issues?
Four points of contact, less ground pressure,
Ah, good point. They're also a lot lighter. You're so smart!
So why don't the humans just run around on all fours?
Maybe get them a few hovercrafts.
Presumably, the sheep don't need to get a quick move on, while dogs simply do not obey the laws of physics.
Some of them seem awfully stuck-up. They need to remove the sticks from their butts.
Don't you dare criticize their traditions. Now relax your sphincter...
French Tripods? Ulla-la.
After all, the chances of anything coming from Mars are a million to one