this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2024
613 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

58808 readers
4410 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GeneralInterest 490 points 15 hours ago (18 children)
[–] poo 187 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

He's such a disgusting greedy little pig boy who frankly belongs in a deep hole where nobody will find him πŸ™

[–] [email protected] 59 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Saddam meme with Sadam crossed out and replaced with Spez.jpg

[–] IAmNotACat 51 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Interesting given that he is actually preparing for an apocalypse scenario where he hides out in a bunker only to emerge a leader of men.

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/01/30/doomsday-prep-for-the-super-rich

[–] [email protected] 46 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Does he know that his net worth will be reduced to either his useful skills, or whatever the next guy gains by killing him and taking his stuff?

Seriously, you better have something real useful for your bodyguards, because they're probably the first ones that'll turn on you.

[–] gdog05 35 points 13 hours ago (4 children)

I love this idea of billionaires making bunkers. Pretty sure I can afford the quikrete and wheelbarrows needed to make this a better world.

[–] popekingjoe 14 points 12 hours ago

Hey I'll help fund and work that too. πŸ’ͺ

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
[–] JeeBaiChow 41 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

What a weaselly thing to do

[–] AngryCommieKender 15 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)
[–] WindyRebel 11 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] AngryCommieKender 7 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

I was going for a TNG reference. The HP reference was entirely unintentional, though may have been unconscious.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] brucethemoose 204 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (8 children)

It requires them to restrict certain categories of video, so that users cannot share content on cyberbullying, promoting eating disorders, promotion of self harm or incitement to hatred on a number of grounds.

Wow, what a horrible, restraining overreach.

I am shedding tears for the 1.2% engagement loss this would cost Reddit next quarter. Imagine what they have to pay devs for filtering abusive videos!

(I hate to sound so salty, but its mind boggling that they would fight this so vehemently, instead of just... filtering abusive content? Which they already do for anything that actually costs them any profit).

[–] chalupapocalypse 16 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

They would have to hire a shitload of people to police it all along with the rest of the questionable shit on there, like jailbait or whatever other shit they turned a blind eye to until it showed up on the news

Not saying it's right but from a business standpoint it makes sense

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Lost_My_Mind 67 points 15 hours ago (8 children)

Well......the problem is reddit's size.

I'm not part of reddit anymore because they filtered me out for abusive content.

The content that was so abusive? I told a story on /r/Cleveland about the time 35 years ago I got my bike stolen.

I wasn't accusing any current reddit user of being the theif. But reddit bots flagged me of being abusive to other users.

We don't even know if that guy who stole my bike 35 years ago is even still alive, much less an active redditor on /r/Cleveland. So who am I being abusive to, when I say it's a bad idea to let strangers ride your bike without some kind of assurance you'll get it back?

[–] GreenKnight23 75 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

I got banned when I told a literal Nazi, that said that literal Jews should die, should drink bleach to purify their genes before they contaminated the genepool.

I still stand by it. my grandfather fucked up Nazis, and I'll fuck up Nazis too.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 13 hours ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] brucethemoose 27 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (6 children)

Fair. +1

But also, that just sounds like they're cheaping out on content filtering. And, you know, kinda broke the enthusiastic community moderation that made it great in the first place.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] db2 109 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Dear Netherlands,

The pigboy is your problem now. Sorry not sorry.

Sincerely,

Everyone else

[–] SlopppyEngineer 56 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (2 children)

You can almost hear the EU lawyers cracking their knuckles and quietly saying: "about that user data protection."

[–] [email protected] 19 points 11 hours ago

Um... Did you read the article? It's about moving their EU Headquarters from Ireland to the Netherlands. GDPR applied before and after. This is specifically about Irish censorship requirements.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 13 hours ago

Yeah, moving to the EU to escape regulation doesn't seem like a smart move.

[–] [email protected] 68 points 15 hours ago (12 children)

Iβ€˜m confused. Reddit claims it doesn’t host videos, just links to them but it absolutely does host videos.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] 30 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

Sounds like another case of US tech companies fucking with the web of EU regulations to nobody's benefit but their own.

It's no wonder they moved to another tax haven. Sorry, sorry. The EU doesn't have tax havens according to their own rules. Low tax threshold geographic jurisdictions.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Wait isn't Ireland an EU tax haven?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] m3t00 9 points 11 hours ago

I never knew so many people lived there.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 15 hours ago

Time for the EU to rip him a new one :)

load more comments
view more: β€Ή prev next β€Ί