this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2024
439 points (99.3% liked)

politics

19254 readers
2895 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
439
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by MicroWave to c/politics
 

CBS News cut out JD Vance’s mic on Tuesday night after Vance sparred with moderator Margaret Brennan over her fact-checking his false claims about Haitian migrants in Springfield, Ohio.

Vance tried to lay out how migrants were entering Springfield before Brennan hit him with a rebuttal: “Just to clarify for our viewers, Springfield, Ohio does have a large number of Haitian migrants who have legal status.”

That appeared to set Vance off, who accused her of violating CBS’ rules for the debate. “The rules were that you guys weren’t going to fact check, and since you're fact checking me, I think it's important to say what's actually going on.”


🗳️ Register to vote: https://vote.gov/

top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 321 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I was told I could lie without consequence.

[–] [email protected] 77 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Well in that case…

🎵They’re eating the dogs

They’re eating the cats

They’re eating the pets of the people who live there🎵

[–] ValorieAF 26 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They're climbing in your windows, they're snatchin' your kitties up

Tryna eat em so y'all need to hide your dogs, hide your cats

(Hide your dogs, hide your cats)

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago

You better hide yo husbands too cuz they eatin’ everything out here

[–] Today 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

https://youtu.be/jq8kV31Glog?feature=shared This one's pretty silly. Had to watch it repeatedly because my husband got the giggles.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Beep, beep, bop, bop, BING! 😆🤣

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

That's cheese to feed the city.

[–] kurwa 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

(Oops I reposted the same one as above from The Kiffness)

[–] [email protected] 42 points 2 months ago

I guess CBS lied.

Huh.

Shrug emoji.

[–] spankmonkey 131 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

The moderation on this debate was miles ahead of the prior debate and pretty much every debate I have seen over decades. They didn't bust every myth, but the absolutely let some debate happen and still called out the worst lies that Walz didn't cover, and even pointed out when questions were not answered.

The one thing they didn't do was confirm the fact that the law that allows undocumented immigrants to gain legal status was passed in 1990. They cut it off just after Walz responded, so hopefully that stuck with some people.

[–] Omegamanthethird 52 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I thought the last debate was surprisingly good. They called out any lies that were egregiously bad or dangerous because of the extremity of the lie, like baby murder and the pet eating myths.

I didn't watch this debate though. How was the fact checking different?

[–] spankmonkey 27 points 2 months ago

The fact checking was more firmly stated compared to the first one where they would let Trump talk over them.

[–] shalafi 6 points 2 months ago

I saw that! We need journalists to grow a pair and hammer down when the question isn't answered.

[–] [email protected] 96 points 2 months ago

The network said this week it would encourage the candidates to fact-check each other, but it never ruled out the notion that moderators would fact-check the candidates.

It’s a pleasure to see the only party that everyone respects worldwide, the master negotiators who fixed the Iran nuclear deal, in action.

[–] distantsounds 33 points 2 months ago

There were no facts being presented, hence the mic cut.

[–] Volume 32 points 2 months ago

So the headline is slightly misleading. While yes, technically Vance's mic was cut off, both his and Walz's were cut of. Iirc the moderator also said something along the lines of "Gentlemen, we have cut your mics off..."