this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2024

42 points (97.7% liked)

Star Trek

1182 readers

4 users here now

/c/StarTrek: Your safe harbored Spacedock in these Stellar Seas!

Fire up the inertial dampeners, retract all moorings and clear space dock. It's time to boldy go where no one has gone before!

~ 1. Be Civil. This is a Star Trek community and lets keep that energy. Be kind, respectful and polite to one another.

~ 2. Be Courteous. Please use the spoiler tags for any new Trek content that's been released in the past month. Check this page for lemmy formatting) for any posts. Also please keep spoilers out of the titles!

~ 3. Be Considerate. We're spread out across a lot of different instances but don't forget to follow your instances rules and the instance rules for Lemmy.world.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Is Q a villain? (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 month ago by setsneedtofeed to c/startrek

20 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I came across this box set and it's really messing me up for a lot of reasons (it is marked TOS despite having characters from all over the place, and for some mistaken reason Gul Dukat is included) but what I really wanted to talk about was Q's inclusion.

Do people usually consider him a villain?

I suppose he has done a lot of things that would be considered antagonistic, with a big one getting a number of Enterprise crew members killed in the first encounter with the Borg, but that seems, at least from his point of view a tough love moment. In the long term, Q did seem to have the survival of humanity as a goal. His judgment of humans was pompous but not villainous.

all 21 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 month ago (1 children)

In the episode where he wore that outfit he held the Enterprise hostage, froze two crew members, and threatened to wipe out humanity.

[–] Hobbes_Dent 23 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Nah. I think they aimed for antagonist but he was so cool that he became a grey area shit disturber and we are all better for it.

[–] ummthatguy 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Using the term antagonist is the foremost point of order. Did he introduce the Federation to one of its most formidable foes? Yes. Did that interaction result in the deaths of 18 crewmembers? Yes. But for the sake of making aware and preparing Starfleet for the hardships to come, it appears to have been of use. Not about to excuse the means to an end argument, though. Q has insider knowledge of potential outcomes and is known to be a meddlesome force (Quint not withstanding). Do his actions then and later justify his intervention?

[–] thejoker954 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

His actions led to more then the death of 18 crew members.

The borg were off doing their own thing. And only doing sneaky raids occasionally.

Q's meddling led to them getting a hard on for starfleet and as a result caused at least hundreds of thousands of deaths.

Would it have happened eventually - yes, but Starfleet may have been more prepared and been able to prevent some of the deaths/assimilation.

[–] zloubida 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Or maybe without this interaction the Federation would have been taken by surprise and wiped. Maybe Q killed aimlessly just for his own pleasure, or Q saved the Federation, and we will never know.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Q could have stopped the Borg as well, so they will always be a villain just like all the other beings of power that do nothing.

[–] zloubida 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Does that make the Federation villains because of the Prime Directive?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If they have Omnipotence and know the future, yes. I understand their prime directive but don't agree with it but I wouldn't call them villains. More of a bureaucratic issue to prevent meddling in other civilisations. I think in real life the federation would try to help everyone and get them to join the federation and take some of their resources to fight the Borg and others that are against them.

[–] zloubida 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

To be omnipotent and knowing the future don't make you know better than others to separate good from evil. Is it right to save a civilization if to do that you have to destroy an other?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

You would have to keep helping so the 1st civilization does not stomp out the 2nd.

[–] FlyingSquid 4 points 1 month ago

Q is omnipotent, or so he claims. He's certainly omnipotent to do things like give the Federation a complete writeup on The Borg a full and realistic simulation of what it is like to go up against them and how they can be countered without killing a single person.

[–] CitizenKong 2 points 1 month ago

The word you're looking for is trickster.

[–] aeronmelon 14 points 1 month ago

The Gorn is less of a villain than Q.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

I can't help but feel offended by some of those poses. Q hunching, the Borg queen running, Khan doing whatever he's doing with his left hand...

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Who is the guy to the far right? Looks like Hugh the Borg but from the Picard series.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Lore, from "Descent".

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

You're right, that does look like Lore. Thanks!

[–] setsneedtofeed 4 points 1 month ago

It's Lore. He is dressed like in the episode where he has a small Borg following. It's a weird box.

[–] Donebrach 8 points 1 month ago

Quite literally yes.

[–] cm0002 2 points 1 month ago

Depends on his mood lol