this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2023
190 points (95.2% liked)

politics

18882 readers
4171 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Dankry 80 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

TL;DR Modern republican campaigns are a roadside souvenir stand hawking tacky knickknacks on middle american yokels who are too dumb and disinterested to care about anything besides cringey puns printed on cheap Chinese merchandise. No ideas. No solutions. Only trinkets.

[–] YoBuckStopsHere 40 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don't think it is wrong to say that a trait of a modern conservative is that they are very gullible and easily conned.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I feel like what we're witnessing is Republican politicians slowly realizing they've been giving their base too much credit

[–] Eldritch 5 points 1 year ago

It's been a trait of conservatism since it's inception. Conservatism in all forms seeks to enshrine the status quo. Conserving nature is a no brainier good thing. Conserving selfish, bigoted human social structures is ALWAYS a BAD thing.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

I find it fascinating. It's a lot like Rome or Lourdes where they sell an endless stream of tat to the faithful.

[–] PoopSpiderman 35 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There’s a sucker born every minute, and two to take him.

A fool, and his money are soon parted.

It’s easier to fool someone than it is to convince them they’ve been fooled.

Republicans are really fucking stupid. I’m tired of their incessant whining. They are the most fragile, and sensitive people on the planet. All of their “try that in a small town” shit is bluster. They are cowards.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

They think everyone that lives in a city was born there when half of us were born in those small towns and left because of no jobs and ignorant assholes.

[–] Wookie_the_Ewok 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Republicans would eat Satan's shit if it meant a Democrat would have to smell their breath.

[–] RubberElectrons 2 points 1 year ago

Holy damn hahahaha

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

sure.

owning is just scorn and mockery. and what else do they have? nothing. no solutions to any of modern world problems. so if ones brain is incapable of finding a solution to a problem the logical behaviour for humans is to make fun of it and if thats not working to solve a problem to increase the mockery to a level of delusion.

[–] gk99 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Probably a reason they have to come up with names like "libtards" while we can just say "conservatives" as an insult because it's self-explanatory.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Because they have no platform nor plans for any real issues.

[–] dhork 17 points 1 year ago

They literally have no platform. They passed a resolution during the last convention in 2020 saying they would not publish a new platform.

That's when I realized they were no longer a political party, and were now a lifestyle brand that sponsors politicians. Which is a genius move. You can't break political promises to your constituents if you don't make any.

[–] Candelestine 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Dingding. It's hard to get elected when your platform is "Make no improvements".

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

And yet they scream "election fraud" when they don't get elected like... uh, you can't just be screaming "dems bad" for 4 years and offer little to no alternative but expect a majority of the votes. That's not how it works

It MAY have worked somehow in 2016 but MOST people learned. We ain't that stupid

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Which is also why they use so much newspeak. A limited vocabulary serves to hinder nuanced discussion or critical thought.

[–] reddig33 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The irony being the ones doing the purchasing are being owned. The libs are laughing at you wasting your money on crap merch with cringe slogans. You’re being grifted. If anything, when someone wears this crap in public it tells the rest of us who to steer clear of/avoid in real life.

[–] shalafi 5 points 1 year ago

I've seriously played with the idea of cranking out conservative merchandise. My god, it's too easy to con these people.

In a similar vein, thought about being a cult leader.

I just don't have the mental fortitude to carry it out, keep up the lie. Hell, I can barely tell a white lie when necessary.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

It'd be interesting if they went back to having an actual ideology instead of just competing to see who can be the biggest spiteful asshole.

[–] MossBear 6 points 1 year ago

Terribly sorry, but I don't feel remotely owned by any of this.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

They love symbols like SS and confederate flags. This makes sense.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

I honestly feel sorry for all these rubes, getting so wrought up, throwing their money away at shitty puns being anti-woke when they don't even know what that means. They have no idea that the people they are supporting with shitty boomer memes are also the same people that are making their lives as shitty as their memes. They don't see beyond the culture war grandstanding to see that their rights are being stolen one by one. I pity them donating their money at bible salesmen in rich suits promising them righteousness in the form of hate for the other.

[–] ProdSlash 2 points 1 year ago

Just like 2016.

load more comments
view more: next ›