Paid more to appear than most make in a year. How conservative.
this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2024
190 points (97.5% liked)
politics
19241 readers
3966 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Well, but think about the value created. They needed to demonstrate their candidate is in a healthy, stable, supportive marriage and definitely not banging some neo-nazi side chick. Her appearance was basically priceless, surprised she didn't ask for more.
How sadly true.
Another immigrant stealing black jobs!
I love the rhyme
Meh. One of the big problems with Hillary was her speaking fees.
Why? Trump's speaking fees even then were 4x higher and he hadn't done shit to talk about.
I wouldn't be surprised if the Trump campaign pays Trump himself to speak at campaign events
That would be 100% in character.
She really is a prostitute, isn't she?
I don't think there is anything particularly wrong with that, I just wish she was more discerning when selecting her clientele.
She picked a bunch of gay, probably self loathing republicans. Sounds like an easy gig if you’re female.
"The former first lady spoke at two political fundraisers for the Log Cabin Republicans this year, and she was paid $237,500 for an April event, according to former President Donald Trump’s latest financial disclosure form. The payment was listed as a “speaking engagement.” "
How the fuck are there still Log Cabin Republicans?
I smell bullshit. No way a bunch of Gay Republicans paid her a quarter million.
And that is a weirdly specific number.
Peter Thiel is gay. And Republican. He would certainly have the funds to pay Melania if he wanted.
And that is a weirdly specific number.
when you're told to launder money, you launder the money.
Was the person who cut the check named Theter Piel?
Not saying 6 figures isn't an insane amount of money for a speaking fee, but Obama was getting $400,000 in 2017. Obama is arguably a better speaker, and Melania doesn't get as many gigs as Obama did (there was a period in 2017 when he did 3 events within a couple months, which caused quite a bit of outrage on the right about his speaking fee), but 6 figures isn't all that unusual for former Presidents/First Ladies (Michelle's is reportedly around $200,000).
Probably someone who's last name starts with a T and ends with his rump?
Or, the new Nabisco Crispy Trumps! They got real curly trump hair taste for your beautiful republican morning meals!
Trump can't cut a 6-figure check.
Nah. He gotta cash that ✅. Would you be interested in new silver boots 🥾 with Trump logo on them?
CNN - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)
Information for CNN:
MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source
Media Bias Fact Check | bot supportSearch topics on Ground.News
https://www.cnn.com/2024/09/23/politics/melania-trump-speaking-engagements