this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2024
151 points (96.3% liked)

science

14867 readers
119 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

<--- rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.

2024-11-11

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 62 points 2 months ago

It was, infact, not all good there.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 2 months ago (2 children)

After decades of journalists attaching the suffix "gate" to anything even remotely scandalous, I was disappointed that I never heard anyone embrace the full stupidity of this practice by referring to this story as "Oceangate-gate"

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 months ago

After some thought, I've decided that we should refer to this apparent lapse by journalists as "Oceangate-gate-gate"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I’ve never understood why gate is used as a suffix in this way.

[–] DrownedRats 7 points 2 months ago

It originated from the Watergate scandal iirc. Watergate being the Watergate hotel but I guess water and gate are easy to separate and -gate kind of works as a suffix.

[–] Sterile_Technique 41 points 2 months ago (3 children)
[–] NegativeInf 20 points 2 months ago

Nah, I'll just watch Iron Lung, thanks.

[–] JWBananas 10 points 2 months ago

Thanks, I hate it

[–] Kushan 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] Sterile_Technique 1 points 2 months ago

If subnautica taught me anything, he voiced the actual sub.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Now... Which dialogue choice did he take?

  1. "All good here"

  2. "All good here" (Lie)

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago

To be fair, at the exact moment he said "All good here" it probably was. It just became very ungood, very quickly.

[–] Etterra 2 points 2 months ago

The first one that guy was a genuine idiot.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting 19 points 2 months ago

All good here 👍💥

[–] Iheartcheese 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] sramder 8 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Followed shortly by ‘oh shit’ and ‘we dropped two weights’ then ‘guys, it’s getting kind of wet in here…’

Just kidding, mostly.

Serious question: how does a submarine know how much it weighs?

[–] just_another_person 36 points 2 months ago (6 children)

Explosive decompression is almost instantaneous at that depth. They wouldn't have had a chance to even blink.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 months ago

Implosive compression?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Wouldn't it have happened so fast that they never even registered the pain of being crushed? Like, the signal from the body never even reached the brain, it was so fast.

[–] just_another_person 20 points 2 months ago (1 children)

So fast they'd not even be able to register what was happening. Not a bad way to go.

[–] snausagesinablanket 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'll take dying in my sleep for 100 Alex.

[–] jordanlund 21 points 2 months ago (1 children)

No joke, I was in the hospital with a heart attack back in January, waiting on my stent.

Woke up at 6 AM and was fiddling on my phone such as you do. Nurse comes in:

"Were you asleep about an hour ago?"

"Yeah, why?"

"Your heart stopped for 8 seconds."

"Um... thank you? I'm not sure what to do with that information..."

[–] Supervivens 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I never really got the “heart stop = dead” thing like yes, if you’re heart stops you’re going to die, but even when someone is beheaded, they are still conscious enough for a few seconds to blink their eyes in response to questions. It’s when the electrical signals in your brain stop that you’re actually dead, not your heart.

[–] jordanlund 8 points 2 months ago

Yup! I love the whole pro life "abortion stops a beating heart!" thing. The heart doesn't really mean much, you can make a heart beat in a petrie dish, that doesn't make it "alive".

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2014/feb/02/stem-cell-research-heart-disease-long-qt

[–] sramder 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Yeah, it was definitely intended as ~~humor~~ an attempt at levity.

[–] Hule 3 points 2 months ago

Yeah, the ocean was decompressed by a tiny bit..

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That's when your spaceship shreds apart.

[–] CrayonRosary 2 points 2 months ago

Explosive decompression

Doubly backwards

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago

I assume that the submarine producer gives stats like empty weight from which the current weight can be calculated.

However, weight isn't the important thing in a sub. It's the weight to volume ratio, or buoyancy.

A sub sinks when buoyancy is negative and rises if the buoyancy is positive.

There are three common ways to achieve the changing buoyancy: the most simple one is a vessel with positive buoyancy adding droppable weights until the buoyancy is negative.

Other ways are a neutral buoyancy vessel that uses it's engine power to push itself up or down. Or a vessel that can change it's buoyancy by filling up tanks with water (to reduce buoyancy below neutral) and blow them out with air or other gases lighter than water (to raise buoyancy above neutral). A combination of several methods is also possible.

[–] jordanlund 4 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Amazing how intact the back half is given, you know, explosive decompression.

[–] Arbiter 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Actually this is the opposite of explosive decompression.

[–] davidgro 19 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago

Yes, but we required the answer in the form of a question. So, no points for you.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

When a car crashes head first into a brick wall, the rear bumper is usually salvageable.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

I think the rear portion was more solid, so just not as many hollow portions to collapse.