this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2024
499 points (94.8% liked)

memes

10678 readers
2767 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TropicalDingdong 42 points 3 months ago (2 children)

We can finally get back to leftist infighting

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] grue 39 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Oh you sweet, summer child. After the election ends, we're going to have at least a month of coordinated all-out fighting from the fascists to stop the votes from being certified -- if Georgia's and Arizona's popular vote results get accurately reflected in the final EC tally it'll be a minor miracle -- and years of "stop the steal" election denial and stochastic terrorism after that.

And that's the best-case scenario.

[–] nadiaraven 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Just like last time I will be holding my breath from November 5 till January 20.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Considering that Biden is currently in power, and the Democratic Candidate is the VP, I don't think there's any danger of a contested transition. Once the votes are counted, the only fuckery the Trumpists could pull would be organized violence, and the military is firmly under Biden's control.

[–] grue 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

Once the votes are counted

You do realize the MAGAs have been appointing "stop the steal" conspiracists to positions throughout the elections bureaucracy and are trying to recruit 100,000 poll "watchers" (read: saboteurs) specifically to try to stop that from happening, right?

Four years ago, the Trump campaign filed 50+ lawsuits trying to throw out votes because of alleged fraud that were basically all thrown out because no fraud could be found, and failed to stop states from certifying votes because the bureaucrats were doing their jobs. Now, they're in a position not only to severely obstruct the counting and certification in the first place, but also sue over accusations of fraud that will be credible because their dumbass followers will have committed it themselves!

And of course, it'll all be juuuuust stochastic and "lone wolf" enough that the Trump campaign itself will have [im]plausible deniability for directing it. The Heritage-Foundation-stacked courts will fall over themselves in their haste to clear Trump of any wrongdoing, while simultaneously saying "aww shucks we still have to invalidate the vote tho" or slow-walking any case they can't plausibly say that about. This will result in either Trump crossing the 270 EC vote threshold by courts handing him wins for states where whole swathes of results for Democratic-leaning precincts have been thrown out, or throwing out enough results that neither candidate gets 270 votes so that the election gets decided by a "one state, one vote" poll in the House. Either way, Trump regains the Presidency "legally," all Hell breaks loose with Project 2025 and the Supreme Court ruling making the President a king, and American democracy as we know it is over.


Please: save this comment, come back to it on Inauguration Day, and mock me for being wrong when democracy and the rule of law prevails. Be merciless about it! Ridicule me to within an inch of my life for my silly, unfounded worrying. I'm serious: please do that and I will love you for it.

Because I have no greater wish than to be wrong about this.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

well.. you were wrong, but only because it was worse than expected.

[–] grue 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Oh, fuck. I really wished on the monkey's paw on that one, didn't it?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

No gloating, yes, and I am crying with you

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

the illegitimate supreme court is very much a danger.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WoahWoah 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Precisely. The real ugliness and violence is currently only simmering. The election is when the boil begins. And the boilover comes after that.

Remember: if Trump wins, there will be disorder, dispersed violence, and then state violence: mass deportations and the disruption and dissolution of various dimensions of the state itself as fascism assumes the helm.

If Trump loses, there will be broad social conflict, disorder, and intensive violence, including a rise in domestic terrorism. I'm actually concerned we will see something like "The Troubles" in Ireland. Federal and state agencies and institutions will be attacked as well as infrastructure: things like power stations and bridges.

There is no threading the needle here. Either scenario results in chaos and violence. Both scenarios result in an increase in danger and a decrease in stability. There's no winning move. We'll think back to this moment as "the good days." Strap in.

[–] grue 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

To be clear, Trump losing (not just the vote, but also his inevitable attempt to seize power anyway afterward) is definitely the vastly preferable scenario here -- "Troubles" are way better than a full-blown dictatorship -- so stopping him is, if not "the" winning move, at least the do-or-die first step towards it.

There is no validity to a dismissive "eh, either way it's gonna be bad" attitude here. We are in an existential fight to achieve "pretty bad" because the alternative is "absolutely catastrophic."

[–] WoahWoah 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Recognizing that things are going to bad regardless of who is elected is simple pragmatism. There's nothing dismissive about it at all. Quite the opposite.

Harris winning the election (which, in terms of the electoral college, she's currently on pace to narrowly lose), will not decrease the amount of active fascists in the United States, so, regardless of who wins, there's going to be trouble and there's going to be a lot of work to do that can't be done with upvotes, downvotes, or social media posts.

It would be wise for people to be prepared for what is to come. Ignoring it makes it worse.

Edit: for instance, there is a man in the woods near I-75 by London, Kentucky picking random people off with a rifle right now. I'm afraid we're going to see a lot more of that kind of stochastic terrorism, which will not simply go way if Harris wins. There are serious problems in America.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The US election cycle is continuous. Someone will win in November, there’ll likely be some bullshit to keep it in the news until inauguration day, then give a week before the party that lost starts the process of finding their pick to contest the next election.

From a foreign perspective it’s tedious as fuck. Our elections are called and wrapped up within 8 weeks, and even that feels too long.

[–] grue 3 points 3 months ago

Your comment makes me wonder if 1930s Europeans thought German politics were similarly tedious.

[–] PugJesus 34 points 3 months ago (1 children)

God, I can't wait. Hopefully, at least a few months of peace before the midterms start going.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 3 months ago

peace

(Subject to availability in your area)

[–] slazer2au 29 points 3 months ago (1 children)

50,000 bots use to post here. Now it's a ghost town.

[–] RightHandOfIkaros 12 points 3 months ago

There was a userbase here. It's gone now.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago

Don't worry Lemmy will always have bean posts to prop them up.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago

They turn into Namibia?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago (4 children)

block the necessary keywords and enjoy the calmness

[–] NickwithaC 4 points 3 months ago

You have to block regular words like "weird" now. It's too ubiquitous. Might as well stay offline until Christmas.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Lemmy with a politics blocklist must be very different. Is there a channel that shares lists?

[–] RightHandOfIkaros 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I have a very long list of blocked political keywords and yet somehow Lemmy users find a way to make political posts that get around all my filters. It is very frustrating. So now I have started just blocking individual users if they post about politics, because a person that posts about it once is most likely going to do it again.

Lemmy without politics is kinda a ghost board. There is maybe 3 or 4 new posts a day. For someone who is not so active, its not much of a problem, but compared to Reddit it is highly frustrating that so much Lemmy content is about politics.

[–] RustyEarthfire 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Lemmy without politics is kinda a ghost board. There is maybe 3 or 4 new posts a day.

I think your approach of blocking any user who posts about politics is eliminating the most prolific posters when 95% of their stuff is non-political. This is not to say your approach is bad, just that it doesn't actually represent "Lemmy without politics".

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

i dont know, but i have common names from us politics and its mostly quiet.

trump, boebert, kamala, musk....

i dont mind politics in general as long as its not that hypersensationalized us vs them american stuff.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago

They're not going to let us have peace and quiet after the election. That's when the real shit begins.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Lemmy.ml after the Russian money dries up

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

And Hexbear.

[–] hark 6 points 3 months ago

Election funds will be all spent then.

[–] finitebanjo 6 points 3 months ago

I got a weird counter example for you, the "Where are the children" community that opposed family separation and indefinite holding times under the Trump Admin.

Biden took office, executive ordered holding time limitations and reimplemented criminal only ICE focus. The community kept posting, much lower popularity obviously, because figuratively the war was over and we could all go home.

[–] thesporkeffect 6 points 3 months ago

This is aspirational. The election is going to get dragged out as long as possible and then longer and then there will be violence unless we win the lottery :(

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

Just you wait until Harris wears a tan suit 😆

[–] feedum_sneedson 4 points 3 months ago

I can't wait.

[–] Etterra 3 points 3 months ago

Oh don't worry, there'll always something new to bitch about.

load more comments
view more: next ›