this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2024
92 points (95.1% liked)

politics

19073 readers
6441 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 66 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Does Donald Trump understand how

Imma stop you right there

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago

Can probably stop a word earlier, even

[–] homesweethomeMrL 10 points 2 months ago

Really.

You know good and goddamned well he’s a complete shit for brains sociopathic rapist, WaPo. You KNOW this.

And yet. Still. You still write about him as a normal person, who’s just slightly goofy. Re:

We can start by noting that there are nine, not five, known nuclear powers, the sort of thing that former presidents might generally be expected to estimate more precisely.

Oh, quite. Quite. It’s such a confounding thing, his ignorance, isn’t it.

And that’s as hard as they ever hit. Also, no mention of the slurring, which. Of course not.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 months ago (1 children)

All indications are that Trump doesn't understand how anything works. That's just not the way his mind is organized. He skates on the surface, focused exclusively on finding things that appear to serve his immediate interests, which are limited to greed, lust and the incessant demands of his insatiable ego.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Please continue

[–] vegeta 20 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)
[–] Today 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Well, he thinks that dropping a battery into the ocean electricutes all ocean life - except sharks. So I'm gonna say NO!

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago

Don't forget how magnetism doesn't work under water!

[–] Theprogressivist 9 points 2 months ago

"Can't we just nuke the hurricane?"

[–] friend_of_satan 16 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I think Betteridge's Law of Headlines applies here.

Any headline that ends in a question mark can be answered by the word no.

[–] billwashere 10 points 2 months ago

Anything that starts with “Does Trump understand” is automatically a big NOPE!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

Betteridge's law of headlines is an adage that states: "Any headline that ends in a question mark can be answered by the word no."

Equally true with anything about Trump's intelligence.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

Does Donald Trump understand?

FTFY

And no, he doesn’t

[–] SkybreakerEngineer 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

"This is an island sitting in the middle of an ocean. It's a big ocean, it's a very big ocean."

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'd like to see Mar-a-Lago turn into Mar-solo-Mar.

[–] brucethemoose 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I've driven by Mar-a-Lago, and they key it sits on is almost like a cliff. He's also on the "coastal" side of the key which protects it from the open ocean a little.

It's a ridiculously wealthy area too, so they'll just fix hurricane damage and erosion. TBH it's not something he has to worry about there.

[–] homesweethomeMrL 3 points 2 months ago

Full of water.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Before I read the article, my reaction was “well, I don’t understand how the ocean works, either, so maybe this is one of the few things I won’t make fun of him for.”

But we’re not talking about fluid dynamics or complex weather patterns. This is basic, simple Geometry 101 stuff. Yeah, I can and will make fun of him for not understanding it.

[–] homesweethomeMrL 7 points 2 months ago

You really need to lower your expectations w/r/t trump.

Lower.

Keep going. Lower than that. More.

Low-wer.

[–] ThePowerOfGeek 4 points 2 months ago

This is the same guy who thinks that exercise is bad for you because you only have a finite amount of energy for your entire lifetime, and exercise expenses that energy source.

This is the same guy who managed to run a casino into bankruptcy.

This is the same guy who argued that a 'wall' made of cheap quality steel would secure the border for years to come.

This is the same guy who stared at the Sun during a solar eclipse.

This is the same guy who can't hold a book the right way up at a PR photo shoot.

This is the same guy who has to use both hands to drink from a bottle of water while in a stationary position.

This is the same guy who promoted injecting bleach and using a flashlight inside the body to kill the corona virus.

This is the same guy who kept boxes of highly sensitive national security documents in the bathroom of his personal residency.

This is the same guy that tweeted "covfefe" and left it up there for the world to mock.

This is the same guy who's economic professor said was the dumbest student he'd ever taught in a twenty-odd years.

No. No he doesn't understand the oceans, or anything else.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

I suppose technically he’s not wrong; it will create more ocean front properties. It’s just that they’ll replace the ones lost to rising sea levels.

[–] SonOfMothman 4 points 2 months ago

Wait I thought he liked Nuclear power? Also he didn’t say a god damn thing. I mean words were said, but they don’t amount to anything. “The biggest problem is that I’m not in charge” basically. Who the fuck is voting for this dipshit, he talks like a child.

[–] ZombieMantis 3 points 2 months ago
[–] teamevil 3 points 2 months ago

He doesn't understand how diapers work

[–] norimee 2 points 2 months ago

Anything that isn't how he expects it, can be changed with a sharpie. Because he's winning at being smart.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

No. And if he does, he has a vested interest in forgetting.

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker -2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Washington Post - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Washington Post:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Internet Archive - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Internet Archive:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://web.archive.org/web/20240813162316/https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/08/13/does-donald-trump-understand-how-ocean-works/
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Kind of impressive that it grabbed WaPo from within the archive link. Neat trick, bot.

[–] yesman -4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I thought Musk was a climate change guy? I sure hope the broader economy is insulated from the market cap of Tesla. When that stock gets a correction, it's going to be a bloodbath.

[–] brucethemoose 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Musk is a Musk guy.

That narrative benefited him before (because Tesla. Maybe SpaceX in a really weird way). Now it doesn't.

[–] homesweethomeMrL 2 points 2 months ago

Well, yeah, he’s specifically tanking it - for - ? Reasons?