this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2024
2 points (52.9% liked)

Unpopular Opinion

6354 readers
10 users here now

Welcome to the Unpopular Opinion community!


How voting works:

Vote the opposite of the norm.


If you agree that the opinion is unpopular give it an arrow up. If it's something that's widely accepted, give it an arrow down.



Guidelines:

Tag your post, if possible (not required)


  • If your post is a "General" unpopular opinion, start the subject with [GENERAL].
  • If it is a Lemmy-specific unpopular opinion, start it with [LEMMY].


Rules:

1. NO POLITICS


Politics is everywhere. Let's make this about [general] and [lemmy] - specific topics, and keep politics out of it.


2. Be civil.


Disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally attack others. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Please also refrain from gatekeeping others' opinions.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Shitposts and memes are allowed but...


Only until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.


5. No trolling.


This shouldn't need an explanation. If your post or comment is made just to get a rise with no real value, it will be removed. You do this too often, you will get a vacation to touch grass, away from this community for 1 or more days. Repeat offenses will result in a perma-ban.



Instance-wide rules always apply. https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

... so you could type anything at the terminal and the artificial intelligence would provide documentation + suggestions for corresponding commands. Of course, the a.i. should never be able to run any commands by itself.

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] blackbelt352 14 points 3 months ago

Of course, the a.i. should never be able to run any commands by itself.

Oh you sweet summer child, that's like handing a toddler a gun and telling them not to shoot anyone.

[–] glimse 7 points 3 months ago

If recent "advancements" in products have taught us anything, it's that adding AI to things that don't need it always makes it better! Right, guys? ....Right??

[–] NateNate60 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I don't agree with this opinion, because it seems very not-well-thought-out to me.

If your computer is having trouble booting up then how are you supposed to get an AI model running there?

If you can get the AI model running, you've got at least a mini kernel working, but that means you need to load that mini kernel, and oh look, where are we now? GRUB-ception?

It seems like a lot of engineering for something that maybe one person per mille might use. The vast majority of users don't do things that would cause GRUB to break and those that do likely already know how to get out of it.

[–] A_A -1 points 3 months ago

Two computers with USB link :

  • error trap on booting computer, and,
  • a.i. + (...? design phase) on the other computer.


Use cases at boot :

  • autodidact // newBee,
  • a.i. assisted teaching,
  • ok ! now it is trendy !


After boot :

  • it works on a single computer, wow :)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Eew, no. Multiple issues with this.

  1. Performance. When I'm booting my computer I want it to turn on ASAP. I don't want it wasting time loading such a heavy system like a "language" model.
  2. Security. Yes, someone will make it run commands. And even if it doesn't, simply suggesting what you should type is already bad.
  3. Discouraging people from reading the manpages, and understanding what the command does, before typing it out. Unless your LLM gives you a comprehensive explanation of the command, but then you're just reinventing the manpages.

(Upvoted as unpopular.)

[–] A_A 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Thanks for the upvote, i expected it to be most unpopular ever 😋
Now about the performance issue : please see my other comment in here where i suggest how it could be ... using 2 computers+ USB link.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

I've seen it. Using a second machine to perform actions is inefficient IMO; plus as someone else said, this already exists - you could simply ask some chatbot the question through your second machine, like writing !ai how does the Linux command "ls" work? in DDG.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Hilarious. Also we have that already it's called using google on your second device.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Heck yeah. Just yesterday I solved a gnupg key issue the good old fashioned way; digging through dozens of forum posts from various websites until one of them worked...

The good old days. Where's the fun in letting a robot do all the work. You don't learn anything.

[–] MotoAsh 4 points 3 months ago

As long as it's a small, local "AI" that's basically just regurgitating man pages and not sending everything off to servers for data scraping and actual processing power.

Anything more than simply feeding it man pages would get gross very fast both for hallucinations and for the ability to keep it up to date with any specific system.

[–] MushuChupacabra 2 points 3 months ago

They may not have seen that documentary TRON.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

The nice thing about Open Source is that the very moment some distro decides to stuff A.I. into itself, that shit will immediately be forked so that we don't have to deal with it.

I'm happy to visit a website where I can ask an AI to grammar check my code or something similar. But There is no way in Hell I'm allowing one to live on my system accessing all my things.

[–] A_A 1 points 3 months ago

... and something similar exists:
https://www.aiterm.net/