The living neurons are round, and the axons are the result of dehydration with ethanol or xylene.
Most scientists would not believe that. But if you are right in some way, we are very far of what I said here before. Clearly it's not me who will convince you otherwise. I wish you the best, take care 😌
Yes, for the hardware, of course. But, if there is large gains to be made in the software (conception ? design ?) then maybe we will see the type of rapid (self improving) change i am expecting.
(... or maybe not since some of these changes are inspired by mimicking what happens inside the brain)
Okay, fair enough ... but what I tried to say, you know, that point when an AGI will generate the next AGI ... it seems to me that we are getting close.
[o3] ... achieves a Codeforces rating — another measure of coding skills — of 2727. (A rating of 2400 places an engineer at the 99.2nd percentile).
So this should mean that the next generation of a.i. should be programmed by artificial intelligence.
Nice new tools including new 4k video generation. Also one anecdote I found funny about when artificial intelligence spots the human searchers hallucination about "black plastic utensils" so to speak !
Whoops, sorry, no ... I didn't have USA in mind while writing ... so in there : yes, "healthcare" is completely fucked up.
i am sometimes one of those angry people in the West who wishes revenge. But if it comes to nuclear Holocaust, not only would the russians be destroyed, also many people in the west would perish. So, I'm wishing for a better outcome.
... either way people are going to die due to preventable misdiagnosis.
This is not how this research is done. You can make diagnosis without applying them to patient. You can, for example, go back to database of past cases, then, create diagnosis for these past cases and see in the present if they were right or wrong. This way (just on example) you can create statistics. No one has to die. You don't know how this is done. (frankly I don't know a lot either ... those people writing the article probably know much more than you and I).
After that, if we know that the A.i. is superior in these cases, (i agree this is a big "if"), then, i would choose the diagnosis from it and i would take responsibility for my choice. I wouldn't sue any doctor and i would still be at an advantage because of this better choice.
But maybe we cannot agree on this topic. I wish you the very best, take care 😌
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oreshnik_(missile)
Oreshnik
(Russian: Орешник, lit. 'Hazel tree'), is a Russian intermediate-range ballistic missile (IRBM) characterized by its reported speed exceeding Mach 10 (12,300 km/h; 3.40 km/s), according to the Ukrainian military. The missile is equipped with six warheads, each reportedly containing submunitions, and has been described as highly difficult to intercept, though modern ballistic missile interceptors are designed to counter this type of system. (...)
Symmetrically in the West, you will find angry people who, momentarily discarding any regards for human life, would find it "interesting" to destroy ruSSia in a nuclear Holocaust.
Then & when, if ever the technology comes to this, let's tell the patient :
You can either go with diagnosis made by artificial intelligence that we know has a rate of this much good diagnosis and this much bad diagnosis ... or you can go with diagnosis made by this human expert, that has this rate and this rate of good // bad diagnosis and let the patien decide.
if I had the choice between suing the doctor or having a better diagnosis, I know what I would choose. Wouldn't you ?
Good research paper from credible medical authorities in the USA. Also, good vulgarisation summary. All of this supplied here without paywall.
Unfortunately, like often, a lot of downvotes from Lemmy user here, who have an irrational bias against artificial intelligence improvements.
Today I learned :
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ward_Cunningham#Cunningham's_Law
Cunningham is credited with the idea: "The best way to get the right answer on the Internet is not to ask a question; it's to post the wrong answer."