this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2024
276 points (99.3% liked)

News

22801 readers
5343 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The FTC has sent mandatory notices for information to eight companies it says engages in "surveillance pricing", the process by which prices are rapidly changed using AI based on data about customer behavior and characteristics. This process, the FTC claims, allows companies to charge different customers different prices for the same product.

The list includes Mastercard, JPMorgan Chase, Accenture and consulting giant McKinsey. It also includes software firm Task, which counts McDonald's and Starbucks as clients; Revionics, which works with Home Depot, Tractor Supply and grocery chain Hannaford; Bloomreach, which services FreshDirect, Total Wine and Puma; and Pros, which was named Microsoft's internet service vendor of the year this year. "Firms that harvest Americans' personal data can put people's privacy at risk," FTC Chair Lina Khan said in a news release. "Now firms could be exploiting this vast trove of personal information to charge people higher prices."

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 month ago

Airlines should be on that list too.

[–] big_slap 32 points 1 month ago
[–] cybervseas 24 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

There's so much information asymmetry between business and consumer. I would not mind if companies varied prices based on data, but did so transparently. With numbers and reasons why they were raising or lowering the price that I'm offered.

Of course, they'd never do that. Not without some aggressive regulation.

Edit: typo that completely changed my meaning

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm not okay with companies charging different prices to different people, with a few exceptions like discounts for low-income people. Adjusting prices to squeeze the maximum amount of money from each individual should be illegal, and IIUC, it is in the EU.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

There is a simple way to prevent this. Make it illegal to change the price of an item more than once a day. It completly kills these dynamic pricing schemes.

Some states already have these rules on the books to prevent price gouging during emergencies, but we need a federal law for it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Doing something similar for stocks would effectively ban high frequency trading, which I'd be all for as it's really just automated insider trading.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

We really need to make data worthless to these companies. There is an OS called qubes that allows you to isolate each application to its own container. I'd really love the ability to have each session with each website be its own container. Like Firefox tab containers but on steroids with each website being isolated.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Bluefin/Aurora Linux does this, but it’s a bit nerdy

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

True transparency would essentially boil down to, "fuck you, because we can, that's why."

[–] PriorityMotif 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

If you go through a drive through or to a gas station they can grab your license plate number with a camera and associate it with the information from your credit card.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Somehow a big grocery chain not only got my address to send unsolicited coupons but they kept a history of everything I purchased and sent coupons for stuff I purchased often. All from using my bank issued debit card. I was so creeped out that I stopped shopping there.

[–] PriorityMotif 4 points 1 month ago

Stores have been using your phones Bluetooth Mac address to see where you walk around and linger for at least a decade. I assume they use cameras to do it now. They can also use facial recognition, at least in most states.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

I drive about 15 miles out of my way for gas. There is an old bait shop + gas station. It takes about 10 minutes longer to fill up, but there are no cameras or ads, and I can get a tube of crickets while I am there.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Okay, but couldn't you look at this as them charging some people LESS? Like, if they know I'm not going to buy their trinket at $10, but I'm likely to buy it at $1 boom, "saved" me 9 bucks!

Plus, fuck the rich, they can pay more than me, I don't care.

But also... Stop fucking spying on everything I do!

[–] ArgentRaven 6 points 1 month ago

It's not about less. It's about then maximizing profits and they aren't about to give anyone a discount. They want to know how much higher they can go before you refuse. If it's lower than their typical project margin, they won't care if you don't buy because you weren't going to be in the customer pool anyway.

[–] doodledup 1 points 1 month ago

You want to take their money? They want to take yours. Sounds about right.