this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2024
362 points (97.9% liked)

politics

19085 readers
4226 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rapidcreek 97 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Jared Polis had the best response to VP speculation: “If they do the polling and it turns out they need a 49-year-old, balding, gay Jew from Boulder, Colorado— they’ve got my number.”

[–] NegativeInf 26 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Ahh Jared Polis. Always a gem.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago

He's also a big nerd gamer, don't forget that

[–] negativenull 5 points 3 months ago

Polis would be great too.

[–] NineMileTower 65 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Michigander here. You can't have her right now anyway.

[–] p5yk0t1km1r4ge 10 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Michigander here as well. We love her but let's be honest she would've been worth giving up for VP.

[–] FlexibleToast 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

No, she needs to be at the top of the ticket. I don't want her squandered on VP.

[–] Tylerdurdon 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

VP gives you the experience and the name recognition. Both of those things are extremely difficult to get otherwise. 3 weeks ago, I had no idea who she was. Since then I've seen her on Colbert and a couple other things (she seems extremely smart and has good charisma), but the point is most folks won't know her.

[–] FlexibleToast 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Statistically, I don't think she would have a very good chance after being VP. Typically, the parties change after a two term presidency. In my lifetime, I've only seen Bush Sr and Biden win after being VP and both were one term presidents.

[–] Tylerdurdon 1 points 3 months ago

That's true. Still hard to get behind someone I've never heard of though, you know? I feel that's how the GOP mentality is. Here's the next thing to be angry/afraid of/crazy about...go!

[–] BassTurd 4 points 3 months ago

Only if her being the VP would be the difference maker. VP can't do much, but look what she's been able to do as governor. She can make more change in her current position than any VP could do.

[–] EnderWiggin 38 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Fuck it. The next three president's should be Harris, Whitmer, and then AOC. Let's go!

[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That would make the chuds' heads explode.

...messy, but worth giving it a go.

[–] mriguy 7 points 3 months ago

Don’t threaten me with a good time.

[–] Sarothazrom 4 points 3 months ago
  1. hard agree
  2. nice username, commander
[–] yesman 15 points 3 months ago

Love to see window closing on the "flash primary" nonsense. Harris/whomever2024LFG!!!

Oh, for those who missed it, Harris got Pelosi's endorsement too.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago

she'll be a great president soon though <3

i'm still holding out hope for harris/kelly though i'd love i president harris put katie hill in her admin since it was disgusting how republicans weaponised revenge porn and an abusive husband against her. especially in an election about women's rights.

[–] Sarothazrom 8 points 3 months ago

Whitmer was my pick for prez, so having her endorse Kamala, as scripted as it likely is, is still a ringing recommendation in my book. Kamala 2024.

[–] Bernie_Sandals 5 points 3 months ago

One good point I've not seen so far pointing towards Mayor Pete as a VP is that as the head of the DOT, picking him wouldn't be taking a Dem from any states, and he might sure up the midwest vote. They've also ostensibly at least worked together a bit, both being in the cabinet and all.

He wasn't my favorite for sure in 2020, but she could certainly pick worse.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod 3 points 3 months ago

Please don't take Shapiro, please don't take Shapiro, please don't take Shapiro...

[–] Tylerdurdon 3 points 3 months ago
[–] mightyfoolish 2 points 3 months ago

I'm very happy Biden dropped out of the election. It was too cruel to demand people to vote for that man. Congrats to all the people who stood against the media hyping Trump as a force that only Biden could beat (and all the trolls on Lemmy saying the same thing).

Looking forward to future debates to see if Harris is ready to take the Democrats in a better direction.