this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2024
214 points (88.8% liked)

politics

19073 readers
5069 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 68 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (55 children)

Obama, Pelosi, Schumer and 2/3rds if Democrats want him out but he's refusing like an old man whose grown children are trying to take away the car keys before he hurts someone.

Unlike those grown children, Democrats don't hold the same love and care for grandpa to force them to grow a pair of balls to know that it's in everyone's best interest and force the issue to pass.

"Most important election in my life" my ass; all that they have to do is stop helping a genocide and they would win, but no.

[–] Grimy 30 points 3 months ago

Most important election in my life

Nothing else at stake here other then his election apparently. Can't help but think about that press release where he blurted out "how do I make this not sound self-centered" before answering why he was wasn't stepping down. Ouf.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I think at this point it's because the DNC is going to shove him down our throats anyway with their expedited digital vote next Friday so instead of causing even more disruption by throwing a wrench into that at the absolute last minute which will cause bad optics for Democrats, they're just resigned to losing entirely.

"Funny" thing is people keep saying "the rich are safe so they don't care if we lose to a fascist." and they couldn't be more wrong. I don't for one second think Trump isn't going after the DNC as well as the party itself.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 months ago

“Funny” thing is people keep saying “the rich are safe so they don’t care if we lose to a fascist.” and they couldn’t be more wrong. I don’t for one second think Trump isn’t going after the DNC as well as the party itself.

i think that we're on track to repeat history and the last time this happened the rich either fled or switched to facism to protect their wealth.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago

Bribery is legal now so the rich think they'll just bribe it away.

[–] CharlesDarwin 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You were doing okay until the genocide thing. I doubt the "genocide" even enters into it for most independent voters.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 months ago (12 children)

I think it's foolish to chase "independent" voters (which I assume you're saying to mean the mythical "moderate"). What Biden is fighting is apathy.

Joe Biden being unwilling to call out the genocide in Palestine absolutely drives apathy among voters who feel disenfranchised by the current two party system.

If the Democrats truly cared about winning elections, they'd court the left and drive voter engagement. If we drive up turnout, the Democrats win every time, even with the ridiculously broken electoral college.

[–] whostosay 3 points 3 months ago

Just who the fuck do you thing you are using history and logic?

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (52 replies)
[–] anticolonialist 35 points 3 months ago (23 children)

Democrats are about to get fucked hard, and their hubris did it to them

[–] return2ozma 5 points 3 months ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

You mean, like in 2016? No. Surely not. No.

load more comments (21 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Kind of a rock / hard place situation.

If they "force" him out without him dropping out, by faithless delegates or somesuch, it would reveal the entire process of selecting candidates is actually a meaningless farce (which everyone already kinda knew, but no one seems very interested in dispelling that myth just yet).

If he won't consensually drop out within the next week I don't see how they get rid of him without it being an even bigger clusterfuck.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pjwestin 16 points 3 months ago (12 children)

Alright this is getting fucking ridiculous. If he won't exit with dignity then just 25th amendment his ass.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The Dems don't want him to exit. They have the means and they know how to use it, so wanting to force him on us has to mean that it's what the party apparatus wants, which is really just what their rich and corporate donors want

[–] pjwestin 18 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Maybe, but if Schumer, Pelosi, and Schiff are all working to get Biden out, I assume at least a sizable chunk of the leadership wants him to go.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago (6 children)

add obama to that list but it doesn't seem to matter; he's dead set

[–] pjwestin 14 points 3 months ago

Then they just need to remove him. Change the rules before the convention to release the delegates. Have his cabinet declare him unfit for office. It would be much better for the party's chances in November if he would bow out gracefully, but if he won't do that, take the choice away from him. He will lose, so we have to do something.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin 14 points 3 months ago

Also, I think Biden might be doing a good job at "party unity" - in that, a lot of the party seems to be united in him not being the 2024 candidate.

[–] hark 13 points 3 months ago (1 children)

What if the party unites to oust him?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

They'd need to be in the same page for his replacement, or it'd be a shit show. A failed attempt would also look awful

[–] Viking_Hippie 12 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Like the DNC saying it to anyone left of Reagan, Biden doesn't want unity. He wants obedience.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] bluemellophone 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Well this post aged poorly

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


As more Democratic members of Congress urged him to drop out — bringing the total since his disastrous debate against Trump to nearly three dozen — Biden remained isolated at his beach house in Delaware after being diagnosed with COVID-19.

“By passing the torch, he would secure his legacy as one of our nation’s greatest leaders and allow us to unite behind a candidate who can best defeat Donald Trump and safeguard the future of our democracy,” said Heinrich, who’s up for reelection.

Separately, Rep. Sean Casten of Illinois wrote in an op-ed that with “a heavy heart and much personal reflection” he, too, was calling on Biden to “pass the torch to a new generation.”

Biden, 81, tested positive for COVID-19 while traveling in Las Vegas earlier this week and experienced “mild symptoms” including “general malaise” from the infection, the White House said.

But among Democrats nationwide, nearly two-thirds say Biden should step aside and let his party nominate a different candidate, according to an AP-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research poll.

Associated Press writers Joey Cappelletti in Lansing, Michigan, Ellen Knickmeyer in Aspen, Colorado, Steve Peoples in Milwaukee, and Josh Boak, Will Weissert, Mary Clare Jalonick, Seung Min Kim and Stephen Groves in Washington contributed to this report.


The original article contains 1,209 words, the summary contains 210 words. Saved 83%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

load more comments
view more: next ›