this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2024
114 points (72.4% liked)

politics

19120 readers
3656 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TexasDrunk 76 points 4 months ago (17 children)

I have defended this man. If he's still the nominee in November I'll still vote for him. But god dammit this is fucking terrible.

I do not have hope for him being replaced but I sure think he should be. Whoever is telling him that he should keep running is guilty of elder abuse.

[–] PugJesus 23 points 4 months ago (4 children)

I do not have hope for him being replaced

Congresscritters, even just a few, coming out for him to step down is massive. It might happen.

[–] TexasDrunk 15 points 4 months ago (1 children)

While I disagree, I both respect and envy your optimism. I'm feeling defeatist today. Maybe tomorrow I'll share your view but today I'm going to drink and brood.

[–] PugJesus 15 points 4 months ago (4 children)

If it's any consolation, Congresscritters coming out against the presumptive nominee WHO IS ALSO THE INCUMBENT sort of thing is fucking unheard of. That this is happening in public is very much indicative of heavy fucking gears moving behind the curtains. Whether that will be enough remains to be seen.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[–] kromem 69 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Honestly, that this is the headline from the meeting is kind of ridiculous.

I absolutely think Biden should step down and hand the torch to whoever is best able to make the case for their beating trump between now and the convention.

But he was always slipping up with word switches over his career.

He was actually very on top of the policy nuances in this Q&A - 1,000x better than Trump could have dreamed of being.

The one word switch in an hour of nuanced policy discussions as the headline is more a failure of the media than Biden.

Even though he def should be making way as his decline is going to get worse and more info is going to come out.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 4 months ago (3 children)

The one word switch in an hour of nuanced policy discussions as the headline is more a failure of the media than Biden.

This a million times over. He did a great job the whole time and had one weird slip up, and all the media cares about is the slip up.

Fuck the media. Focus on the substantive part of the meeting, not the one meaningless gaffe. I say stupid shit all the time by accident, it doesn't matter. It's not even a sign of age, people just do this kind of thing because we're human.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago

The media was seething because they can't just run another word flub every day. Biden turned their repeated questions about minor misstatements into a policy discussion.

They don't want to run the story "NATO meeting a success" because it doesn't get as many clicks as "Biden secretly nuts". They've become tabloids.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 39 points 4 months ago (2 children)

This is legitimately scary. Trump does this every second, now Biden is doing it every other conference. 4 years ages anyone, let alone the man in charge of NATO, the biggest economy, and running for re-election.

I am genuinely starting to be at a loss. I understood the life long stutter, I understood people age differently, I understood that soundclips and sneaky edits can make things look bad, but Jesus Christ. Is this the same day as the "President Putin"?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] Coach 13 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Brutally awful. I am heartbroken that this is happening; to him and this country.

[–] Riccosuave 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

He is doing this to himself, and his hubris is dooming the country.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 months ago (1 children)

He is the newest RBG. Not letting go of any of it to try and save America, when it just delays and makes the problem worse because they didn't listen to fellow polticans or the public.

[–] Riccosuave 5 points 4 months ago
[–] [email protected] 27 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Great we're going to be set back hundreds of years because an old Democrat refused to step down...

AGAIN.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 4 months ago

The way media works, any good he might have gotten out of the speech or question and answer session is going to be completely overshadowed by this flub.

I completely got what he meant. But it's another bad moment.

Overall, the whole impression I got was grandpa Joe giving storytime. I just don't think that's what we need at this time.

[–] PugJesus 20 points 4 months ago (2 children)

He needed a home run to have any chance of unfucking this. He's hitting a single. He's a detriment to the ticket from here on out, I think.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] oakey66 19 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Straight up witnessing elder abuse. My grandfather was getting so old that he was making basic mistakes while driving. We took the keys away because he could hurt someone.

The fact that they're allowing this man to humiliate himself and this country over and over again speaks to the cruelty of the people who are still covering for this.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Literally sickening. I've had this happen to family members and neighbors. It's always the easist to abuse those who can't even see they are being played.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kescusay 18 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (4 children)

Sigh... Well, that's it. I think he's done.

For the last five years, Republican attacks on Biden's age and health have been continuous and stupid. For 4.9 of those years, they've been clearly and utterly baseless, which is what makes this doubly infuriating.

He's had good moments since the "debate," several of which were good enough to make me think he was fine and this was just more Republican bullshit. And even the debate itself, I thought he warmed up after the first twenty minutes or so, and was happily willing to believe he really did just have a cold + jet lag + the general lack of resilience that comes with very old age. Hell, get me sick and then hopped up on cough medicine and I become completely incoherent.

But this... This is two weeks later, and he still couldn't hold it together. He still seemed listless and intermittently uncertain what was going on.

Maybe this is old age catching up to his speech impediment. Maybe it's not an actual decline, it's just the stress of the job and a lapse in his ability to make his mouth do what his brain wants it to do. Maybe.

But even if that's the case, even if that's all it is, communication is a core responsibility for the President of the United States of America. And for whatever reason, be it cognitive issues or just an inability to clearly talk, he simply isn't communicating well anymore.

I hate saying this. I really do. He's been a very good president. But he should step down and let Kamala Harris take the reins. It's time.

[–] anon6789 6 points 4 months ago

Your comment is the one most in line with my thought process.

I thought he did just fine in the debate other than having the cold. I've defended him since then both here, and to people in my real life. I still think he may be the best president in my life (since first term Reagan), and I was hoping he had a great time at NATO and was going to crush this press conference.

But while I was waiting for it to start, I saw the Putin flub. Then he comes out, sounds tired, sounds hoarse and keeps coughing, keeps pausing, keeps getting names wrong. We got creepy Whispery Joe again. It was so awkward and I felt so bad for him. He's done a great job, but it looks time to throw in the towel on this campaign.

I'm in an important state for presidential elections. If they keep him upright through November, he's my guy. If they put in another Dem, I'm with them. But I'm disappointed now it seems too late for him to leave with dignity. He deserves a good legacy, but now he's going to be Sleepy Joe, especially if he drags this out.

What happened with RBG was a tragedy for me and the country, but this could be apocalyptic for our democracy. I'm so mad that a felon is the solid choice for near half the country. I can't trust Biden to be our champion in this fight.

To anyone that didn't watch the conference, watch it. I don't know how anyone in good conscience can say pressing him to continue is for the best.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] paf0 16 points 4 months ago (5 children)

This was surreal. To his credit he eventually got into his groove as he moved through his list of approved journalists.

[–] givesomefucks 11 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

He's still going and he's not doing great...

Like, he is saying a lot of words, and they do seek to connect with the ones right next to each other most of the time. But it almost never has anything to do with the question after the first sentence or two

I can't tell if he's pretending to talk to people or actually talking to people in the audience. Like I think he sees journalists making comments or reactions and addressing them.

Edit:

When asked if his delegates could vote for someone else if they don't want him he said:

That's the Democratic process

Then leaned in all creepy and whispered

That's not going to happen

Edit 2:

Fucking hell...

They asked about "VP trump" at the end and said trump had already latched into it.

When asked for comment Biden said:

Listen to him

Like? Listen to trump?

Then did his best Monty Burns walk off stage.

As with everything Biden, I highly recommend everyone watch it when they can.

[–] paf0 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It went on too long, he started to lose his train of thought a few times. The end was weird too. I'm not sure "listen to him" meant what he thought it meant.

[–] givesomefucks 8 points 4 months ago

The feeding frenzy at the end definitely confirmed that questions were pre-approved and they had to stick with them.

He was hours late because he was cramming the answers for what he was knew was coming.

Nothing about this was unscripted

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 months ago

He also referred to Zelenskyy as "President Putin"

[–] sturmblast 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Sooo Trump has been doing this for years too... can we just kick them both out the race and do-over please?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago

There's really no way to express how sad this is. We really don't want the fascist to win, but it's time to lay your burdens down, Joe. We love you, but give it up.

[–] brucethemoose 9 points 4 months ago (2 children)

And here come the sound bites.

This is the problem. I don't want to excuse Biden, but even if 95% of the speech is fine, the 5% is all 99% of readers will ever see.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] givesomefucks 7 points 4 months ago

Then he said he was going to defeat VP trump...

And.i honestly don't know if he meant he'd beat Kamala and be the candidate in the general or if he meant he'd beat Trump in the general?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago

This is getting kinda sad, bro should be sitting at home.

[–] NocturnalMorning 6 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Eh, if you actually watch the video and don't take it out of context you realize he meant Harris, bcz he later refers to how they can beat trump. Sometimes you say the wrong thing, I've done it before and I'm barely into my 30s, and nobody accuses me of being senile.

To be clear, he should have stepped down a long time ago, and I'm not really a fan of Biden. But he's been making mistakes in speeches like this his entire career. It wasn't until he became president that everyone started losing their mind over it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

omg, this guy has to be finished. He cant even hold it together this long. wow

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago

At least he tried his Best!

load more comments
view more: next ›