ERROR: permission denied for "GIRLS"
this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2024
301 points (91.7% liked)
LinkedinLunatics
3032 readers
3 users here now
A place to post ridiculous posts from linkedIn.com
(Full transparency.. a mod for this sub happens to work there.. but that doesn't influence his moderation or laughter at a lot of posts.)
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
At least he's wearing the red flag on the outside.
One of the reasons women will find this repugnant is because they didn't normalize their tables. Should be boyfriend_id is null.
For that matter, why is waist size a Boolean?
They allowed business logic to pollute the DB table, and "small waist" is a defined range in some confluence doc somewhere.
load more comments
(2 replies)
And why is cuteness and craziness binary?
load more comments
(1 replies)
Why is there a separate table for men and women in the first place? Shouldn't there be a person table with a many to many relationship with itself (because polyamory exists)?
To that point a person table with a relationship table. So this way you can reference relationship between two or more persons within the relationship table and that could be joined to the person table if needed. I don't think you'd really be able to keep it within one table while exploring multiple relationships unless you're storing a list of ids that is interpreted outside of sql. Also a relationship table would allow exploring other types of relationships such as exes, love interests, coworkers, family, friends, etc
load more comments
(2 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
Or, if you allow for polyamory and non-hetero relationships, you probably need a rel table (and some joins in the query).
Maybe GIRLS is just a view...
Maybe it's supposed to imply that boyfriend is an attribute of the particular girl. Like saying she isn't someone's boyfriend. It's probably a holdover from the original data architecture and nobody ever bothered to modify the table later on in case there's a select somewhere that expects that field to exist.
load more comments
(4 replies)
~~and smallwaist = true~~
and itty_bitty_waist = true
and round_thing_in_your_face = true
is_sprung = true
It should be waist_size=1
Should be age > (my_age / 2) +7
Why would there be an age and my_age column on the table GIRLS?
Good point.
Should be
age > (@my_age / 2) +7
FTFOP - now my age is some value defined outside the immediate query.
More likely, the GIRLS would be a view of some table persons and you could query my_age from that table too.
load more comments
(3 replies)
Found the programmer thread that criticises the data model instead of the t-shirt
Gonna sound racist but deal with it.
I constantly meet asian developers (Singapore , India, China, etc) with this edgelord personality. They come to American conferences and meetups, say some wild sexist shit, and someone has to politely let them know not to.
Some backtrack. Some apologize. Some literally freeze up and pretend like it didn't happen.
We do still live in a bubble in the west. We're fighting for equity across genders and race, while some parts of the world are still questioning if sexual harassment against women at work is really that big of a deal.
Many of my guy coworkers have been (and are) sort of misogynistic, and homophobic (I'm in India). It makes me really uncomfortable. Might start reporting people to HR one day.
Just get to know HR first. They might be mysogynists themselves (even if they are female).
That last part is a face saving culture reaction. If you're feeling culturally sensitive the thing to do is just move on and see if they do it again.
This is not funny and any man wearing this would probably not pass a similar test using any woman's criteria. If I saw someone wearing this my first thought would certainly not be "hey this is a guy with a great sense of humor and I would like to hang with him!".
This is why we have codes of conduct.
Who says programmers don't have a sense of humor?
No one. It's just what you pretend people say to make yourself feel like some kind of special exception.
me. I said it.
Well then you're a mean old doody head.
most infurating part of this is the mixing of cases
shitty taste <> "humor"
This is the most Indian shit I have seen this week.
Most SQL Dbs use bits, so it would be WHERE field = 1
The entire shirt caused me 4d6 psychological damage.
load more comments
(6 replies)
He forgot the "TOP 2" qualifier.
Heh. That reminds me of the feeling when I carefully place a LIMIT 100 and get 0 results...
Big pp energy over here
view more: next ›