this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2024
1600 points (96.0% liked)

linuxmemes

19653 readers
2052 users here now

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

Face it, Linux is just the kernel. You use systemd as your operating system.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Ya'll need God.

Posting this from TempleOS

[–] celeste 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

How'd you get internet working?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

All things are possible through Christ lol

[–] psmgx 3 points 2 days ago

All things are possible though profound autism and schizophrenia

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

Holy Water most likely

[–] [email protected] 151 points 4 days ago (4 children)

wow, I could read and entire book of this. It's a new genre of erotica I think. Very high quality

[–] GladiusB 58 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Do you want the pegging scenes to be implied or graphic?

[–] deadlock 35 points 4 days ago
[–] extremeboredom 26 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Can it be implied that they're very graphic?

[–] Haaveilija 30 points 4 days ago (1 children)

No, a real linux user only needs a cli

[–] CrazyLikeGollum 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

So, not graphic, just verbose.

pegging -v

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 4 days ago

Parts of 4chan’s take on the Big Bang Theory may fit the bill:

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Olap 174 points 4 days ago (27 children)

It's systemd+gnu+linux these days

[–] [email protected] 142 points 4 days ago (19 children)

Firefox+Plasma+Wayland+SystemD+GNU+Linux

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] [email protected] 47 points 4 days ago (7 children)

I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you're refering to as GNU/Linux, is in fact, systemd/GNU/Linux, or as I've recently taken to calling it, systemd plus GNU plus Linux. GNU/Linux is not an operating system unto itself, but rather another free component of a fully functioning systemd init system made useful by the systemd daemons, shell utilities and redundant system components comprising a full init system as defined by systemd itself.

Many computer users run a modified version of the systemd init system every day, without realizing it. Through a peculiar turn of events, the version of systemd which is widely used today is often called GNU/Linux, and many of its users are not aware that it is basically the systemd init system, developed by the Red Hat.

There really is a GNU/Linux, and these people are using it, but it is just a part of the init system they use. GNU/Linux is the os: a collection of programs that can be run by the init system. The operating system is an essential part of an init system, but useless by itself; it can only function in the context of a complete init system. GNU/Linux is normally used in combination with the systemd init system: the whole system is basically systwmd with GNU/Linux added, or systemd/GNU/Linux. All the so-called GNU/Linux distributions are really distributions of systemd/GNU/Linux!

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (25 replies)
[–] [email protected] 41 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Without the mention of mansplain and womansplain this would be funny

[–] [email protected] 63 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I work in IT and sometimes I have to explain something to a user who is somewhat tech-illiterate. Even developers may have significant blind spots when it comes to their OS or networking, for example.

So, if I notice it, I'll change some terminology and I may explain instructions differently or use metaphors so every user understands what I'm saying.

And most coworkers do the same thing.

Here's why I bring this up: For whatever reason, some colleagues give female coworkers the same treatment.

And that's weird.

If someone is constantly treated like this, they should be allowed to rant about it on their blog. I'm fine with snark if it geht's a point across.

[–] Mango 17 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Is it bad if I tend to do this except to everyone because I don't generally expect people to know the same specific stuff as me?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

No. If it's everyone, then it's everyone and at worst it's not the most efficient way to communicate.

I would say, if you single out a group of people based on physical characteristics, then it gets weird.

But if it's "The internet won't start" vs "Every packet on port 433 is dropped even though no firewall rule is set", then I think it's reasonable to make some asumptions and adjust communication accordingly.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 3 days ago

hey look its the guy from the meme

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] udon 12 points 3 days ago

Actually, it's GNU/unkempt, bearded man

[–] [email protected] 36 points 4 days ago (1 children)

A typical ActivityPub+Lemmy post.

[–] ripe_banana 12 points 3 days ago

And its just beautiful.

[–] boatsnhos931 5 points 2 days ago

Ride his face into VALHALLA!!!!!

[–] nUbee 45 points 4 days ago (5 children)

It would seem that GNU/Linux or Linux (whatever the user-accessing operating system is called) is the only OS that must mention its kernel. No one calls Windows the NT operating system, nor does anyone call Mac OS the Darwin operating system. So why should Linux be the exception?

When I think of GNU, I think of a project that had a very particular goal in mind: build an operating system that replaces Unix with entirely free software. The project got nearly all the way there, but before they got a usable kernel working, Torvalds licensed his kernel with the GPL. With the Linux kernel combined with GNU, we have an OS the GNU project set out to create. So why should Torvalds get all the credit? Without calling the OS GNU, most people don't even know how or why it came to be.

I could see a valid argument to just simply call the OS GNU. It was the name the original team gave the project to have a fully functional OS made with entirely free software. True, Torvalds didn't write Linux for GNU, but neither did the X Window System. A Kernel is essential for operation though, so I can see why the name GNU/Linux was proposed.

[–] bravesirrbn 20 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

Maybe it just boils down to "Linux" simply sounding better when pronounced

Just like e.g. most people just say "velcro" and not "hook-and-loop" as the company Velcro itself wants people to call it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 4 days ago (9 children)

"The OS" doesn't exist. The operating systems you're talking about are called Debian, Ubuntu, Arch, Fedora, RHEL, etc etc. The main work of making an actually usable OS from the various free software components others have written has always been done by the teams responsible for these products.

But we still need a way to refer to them collectively, and it used to make sense to call them "Linux" because they were pretty much the only operating systems that used the Linux kernel, but now that Android is the most widely used OS on the planet, it doesn't anymore, and this alone is a reason to say GNU/Linux unless you want to include Android.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] BetaDoggo_ 29 points 4 days ago (4 children)

What's the deal with Alpine not using GNU? Is it a technical or ideological thing? Or is it another "because we can" type distro?

[–] [email protected] 38 points 4 days ago

All the core tools are actually a single executable with many symlinks to it, which makes the distro very compact. This makes it very nice as a base for Docker images.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/BusyBox

[–] [email protected] 26 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It's because we can to an extreme. Extremely lightweight distro. Very nice in containers and vms. One of the most loved ones out there.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I don't know if people use it on desktop but with its minimal size it's convenient as hell for docker images that don't need a lot of dependencies installed

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ziglin 15 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I know it's very efficient and small (I believe it needs less than 80mib of ram with nothing else running) and that they leave out some of the basic commands like man to save space. Maybe they wrote more minimal versions of some coreutils?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 81 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Hnng yeah thats right womansplain to me, whip out those big beautiful FACTS and correct me till I BLEED

[–] kurwa 50 points 4 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TrickDacy 52 points 4 days ago

This is fucking gold

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 days ago
load more comments
view more: next ›