BetaDoggo_

In their human choice benchmarks it was only chosen 59% of the time compared to 4o. That's a 15-20x cost increase for 9% difference.

Poor moderator probably had a foot fetish

That fight is primarily over their first amendment right to call it what they want without retribution from the government. The name change was a distraction but the first amendment threat is very real.

He'll be dead by then, this is just another distraction as they continue to tear up the government.

That 20% still gives them the second most seats and is 10 more points than they got last time.

They weren't doing much for the first 3 weeks either. The closest to resistance they've gotten is the AP fighting the gulf of America bs. I don't feel like anything has changed, maybe it's the people or algorithm you get your news from.

It's insane that they're still trying to blame user error for this basic issue. The design shouldn't allow double the rated amperage to go through a single wire/pin without causing the whole thing to shutdown.

Immortals is far too generic to be a problem, there are plenty of other works that also use that name. The name changed from gods and monsters because they didn't want to fight monster energy and potentially delay the game.

This would also effectively ban the use of any research produced by a Chinese national. Any papers which cite the work of Chinese labs (most of them) would be illegal, as this could be interpreted as aiding Chinese AI research.

200 tokens per second isn't achievable with a 1.5B even on low-midrange GPUs. Unless they're attaching an external GPU it's not happening on a raspberry pi.

This article is disjointed and smells like AI.

The most important part to note is that 80% is held in a single wallet. The rug pull potential is high even by crypto standards.

The llama-1 paper acknowledged the use of the books dataset, libgen isn't mentioned in any of the papers so this is new info.