this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2024
95 points (87.4% liked)

Technology

55555 readers
6452 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NegativeLookBehind 91 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] essell 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Where can you see lions.. Only in Kenya!

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] hohoho 2 points 1 week ago

Kenya only see lions through windows

[–] Dremor 77 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's a RISC they are not willing to take.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago

ba dum tsss

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 week ago (3 children)

They tried Windows on Itanium and on Alpha. I think the biggest issue is even though the OS could be recompiled, most apps are not compiled at install in order to take advantage of the underlying platform. You saw a similar issue with the original Surface being ARM only. Sure the OS was there but people couldn’t run the Windows apps they were used to and Microsoft got held responsible rather than the developers.

Alternatively you’d have to put an x86 emulation layer which would slow apps down and people would again ask “why?”

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

One of the great advantages of software distributed with the source code is the flexibility to move to different platforms and architectures. I wonder if moving to a snap/flatpak model will change this flexibility in the future.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They tried that, it's called UWP. A lot of programs don't want to be distributed through the microsoft store though, forcing them to use "old" .exe's

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

God knows I don't want that crap either. They're always bastardized versions of full apps.

[–] Brkdncr 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Hmm I wonder why MS has spent so much time converting office apps to run on webview2…

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Microsoft has always embraced their own migration. They converted their apps to UWP. They’re making them platform agnostic with webview2. If you want to run just their software on any architecture that’s fine, but Windows and x86 have been co-mingled and anyone who installs Windows expects their 3rd party software to just work.

[–] Brkdncr 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

They’ve also been pushing PWA hard. A lot of apps run on webview2 even in specialized industries.

I won’t be surprised if we see a larger push to non-x86 and if it’s arm then it’s also possible to go risc-v if app support is there.

[–] Veraxus 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Emulation worked (and still works) great when Apple switched from x86 to ARM. It can be done.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

Also when Mac went from PPC to x86

[–] pelya 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

RISC-V is not proprietary enough.

[–] ReginaPhalange 7 points 1 week ago

as it’s seen as a threat to the tech that the US can influence or outright exert control over

Good

[–] Treczoks 13 points 1 week ago

Why would anyone do that? Even Windows on ARM is only a desperate move by Microsoft to make an appearence of keeping up with times, but RISC-V?