this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2024
93 points (95.1% liked)

politics

17997 readers
4191 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Religious conservatives see opportunities for fresh gains after a series of victories during Trump’s first term. Rights advocates see a dangerous blurring of church and state.

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CharlesDarwin 47 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Establishing a more visible role for Christianity in public schools, including more prayer led by both teachers and students.

I hate these people just so very much. They aren't just happy with keeping their stuff in their houses of worship and their homes and inflicting it on their own children; they want everyone else to join in on their little book club, with the power of the State enforcing this.

Fuck them. This is a secular nation - not one mention of the character of Jesus in the Constitution.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Even better, a big chunk of the founders put their name to this treaty paragraph:

[–] CharlesDarwin 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Treat of Tripoli, yes?

I understand what they were doing there when it comes to diplomacy and pointing out the facts about our country's founding, but I do wonder if they knew about the "People of the Book" thing within Islam.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yes, the 1796 Treaty of Tripoli, English version

I don't think that much of Congress knew much of anything about Islam, though a few had in fact read a translation of the Koran

[–] Diplomjodler3 24 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The Handmaid's Tale perfectly describes the kind of society they want.

[–] CharlesDarwin 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I do so look forward to a day when I never, ever have to give one thought in the world about what this rabid minority wants.

[–] chase_what_matters 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I wouldn’t get my hopes up, Chuck.

[–] CharlesDarwin 1 points 1 week ago

I fear that you may be right.

[–] Got_Bent 5 points 1 week ago (3 children)

When I was still watching that show, I was perplexed that Democrats would say that's the world Republicans want and Republicans would say that's the world Democrats want.

I'm firmly in the former camp and cannot for the life of me figure out how a conservative could agree with the latter.

[–] ThePowerOfGeek 7 points 1 week ago

It was just Democrats expressing their (accurate in this case) analysis. And Republicans projecting, as per usual.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

Ah yes, democrats are widely known for their support of christofascism. Always out there forcing their religious beliefs on society, claiming America as a birthright theocracy.

[–] CharlesDarwin 5 points 1 week ago

Wow, haven't heard any cons making that claim, but I certainly believe they have.

I think it's much the same way they know something is deemed a bad thing and don't want to be called out for that thing, so they hilariously try to flip the script, all the while demonstrating they don't really understand the term and why it's problematic. See: racism and fascism. They claim Democrats are the real racists for....some inane reason (for supposedly "cancelling" some white man, for instance, or because they are seeing too many brown people on their screens, or...). Or that Democrats are the real fascists because...donnie is facing questions in court for his illegal activities, or because a xtian saw a rainbow flag somewhere, or....

I guess they heard normal Americans talking about how Handmaid's Tale is a rabid winger's wet dream, and just did a "no u" on it...

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oof. WaPo wants an email address to access an article a subscriber gifted access to. Here is the archived version instead https://archive.is/3jOgi

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah, they started doing this several days back, when the new management came in

[–] Eldritch 4 points 1 week ago

The enshitification will continue until profits improve.

[–] 555 5 points 1 week ago

They’re gonna allow the seven fundamental tenets too, right?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Since Trump lost his reelection bid, they have claimed additional successes, with Republican-run red states enacting legislation that restricts transgender care and limits the books that can be taught in school or borrowed from the library.

But far from declaring victory, those who advocate for a more pronounced role for hard-line conservative Christian doctrine in American public life are actively planning to enact a fresh wave of changes in a second Trump term.

Biden, a practicing Catholic who regularly attends Mass, has vowed to protect religious freedom and pointed to some of Trump’s policies — especially a travel ban on people from several majority-Muslim countries — as violations of that value.

“In Trump’s America, women will live in fear of having their pregnancies monitored or facing punishment if they have an abortion; teachers are told what books they can teach in the classroom and grown adults who they can love and marry,” said Biden campaign spokesperson Ammar Moussa.

“The next conservative President must make the institutions of American civil society hard targets for woke culture warriors,” reads the mandate, which says promotion of “transgender ideology” is akin to pornography and should be treated as a crime.

“He didn’t make any secret [when he was president] about the fact that he believed Christianity to be probably the premier religion in America,” said Darrell Scott, an Ohio pastor and former member of Trump’s informal White House evangelical advisory group.


The original article contains 1,944 words, the summary contains 237 words. Saved 88%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!