this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2024
93 points (95.1% liked)

politics

18043 readers
2972 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Religious conservatives see opportunities for fresh gains after a series of victories during Trump’s first term. Rights advocates see a dangerous blurring of church and state.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CharlesDarwin 47 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Establishing a more visible role for Christianity in public schools, including more prayer led by both teachers and students.

I hate these people just so very much. They aren't just happy with keeping their stuff in their houses of worship and their homes and inflicting it on their own children; they want everyone else to join in on their little book club, with the power of the State enforcing this.

Fuck them. This is a secular nation - not one mention of the character of Jesus in the Constitution.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Even better, a big chunk of the founders put their name to this treaty paragraph:

[–] CharlesDarwin 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Treat of Tripoli, yes?

I understand what they were doing there when it comes to diplomacy and pointing out the facts about our country's founding, but I do wonder if they knew about the "People of the Book" thing within Islam.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yes, the 1796 Treaty of Tripoli, English version

I don't think that much of Congress knew much of anything about Islam, though a few had in fact read a translation of the Koran