this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2024
328 points (99.7% liked)

politics

17997 readers
4259 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SlippiHUD 109 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Democrats: "You're being poisoned and we need to clean it up"

Republicans: "the poisoning will continue until you give the poisoners immunity"

[–] AbidanYre 67 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Morons: bOth SiDes!

[–] Bookmeat 60 points 1 week ago

So prosecute them first, then they can go to jail and clean up.

[–] roguetrick 46 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Party of fiscal responsibility just showing who's pocket they actually care about.

Edit: also

The legislature has so far rejected that proposal, and it is now on break for the rest of 2024.

I understand farmers like having part time legislature so they can both participate in government and run harvest season, but Jesus Christ Wisconsin is supposedly a full time legislature.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

One more reason to vote them out of office now that the gerrymandered maps are gone!

[–] WhyDoYouPersist 33 points 1 week ago
[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Jesus Christ, they're like the villains from Captain Planet.

[–] Potatos_are_not_friends 27 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Both parties are the same, right?

This one party wants to... Allow corps to continue being shitty.

[–] Wilzax 13 points 1 week ago

So prosecute the Republicans committing extortion and proceed with the cleanups

[–] Feliskatos 13 points 1 week ago

Law and order is only for little people!

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Wisconsin Republicans are withholding $125m designated for cleanup of widespread PFAS contamination in drinking water and have said they will only release the funds in exchange for immunity for polluters.

The move is part of a broader effort by Republicans in the state to steal power from the Democratic governor, Tony Evers, the funding’s supporters say, alleging such “political games” are putting residents’ health at risk.

“People really feel like they’re being held hostage,” said Lee Donahue, mayor of Campbell, which is part of the La Crosse metropolitan area and has drinking water contaminated with astronomical levels of PFAS.

The Environmental Protection Agency this year established limits for several of the most common PFAS, including levels at four parts per trillion (ppt) for the most dangerous.

In Campbell, where more than 500 wells have tested positive for PFAS at levels up to thousands of times above federal limits, many suspect high rates of cancer and other serious ailments that have plagued the town’s residents stem from the dangerous chemicals.

The city and county have so far spent nearly $1m trying to determine the feasibility of tapping into a neighboring aquifer and continue to monitor it to ensure the PFAS plume contaminating their drinking water source does not migrate.


The original article contains 706 words, the summary contains 208 words. Saved 71%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!