this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2024
376 points (95.0% liked)

Science Memes

11189 readers
2743 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 51 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

Yep for those curious how it harms native bees:

But scientists say competition with honey bees may also play a role. In a 2017 report in Conservation Letters, researchers calculated that during three months, honey bees in a typical 40-hive apiary collect the equivalent amount of pollen and nectar as 4 million solitary wild bees. “Brilliant foragers,” honey bees can “dominate floral resources and suppress native bee numbers,” says lead author Jim Cane, a retired federal biologist who heads the nonprofit WildBeecology.

Honey bees also carry diseases that can infect natives, including deformed wing virus and the parasite Crithidia bombi. Researchers have found that native bees near apiaries can suffer a high incidence of such illnesses.

Also some fun facts: most North American native bee species don't even live in hives or produce honey for themselves at all. They also almost never sting too

Unlike honey bees, more than 90 percent of our nearly 4,000 native bee species live not with other bees in hives but alone in nests carved into soil, wood or hollow plant stems. Often mistaken for flies, the majority are tiny and do not have queens or produce honey. Without a hive’s larvae and food supplies to defend, “native bees almost never sting,” Mizejewski say

https://www.nwf.org/Home/Magazines/National-Wildlife/2021/June-July/Gardening/Honey-Bees

[–] [email protected] 45 points 5 months ago (1 children)

So just like European settlers they took all the resources and gave the natives bee smallpox.

[–] chonglibloodsport 2 points 5 months ago

I’ve seen some of these tiny bees pollinating my tomato plants!

[–] [email protected] 28 points 5 months ago

I have a few ground-nesting bees buddies in the yard.
They're chill and I see them pollinating my garden now and then.
They're now part of the family and I'll knock some sense in any guest who tries to harm them.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 5 months ago

I was planning to keep bees, until someone informed me that honey bees outcompete native bumbles.

And I fucking love bumbles.

So now I'm modifying the garden to be bumble friendly, and living without enormous amounts of honey.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 5 months ago (2 children)

i wonder what other invasive from europe endangers natives

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

It probably doesn't happen too often... Right?

[–] veganpizza69 1 points 5 months ago
[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Idk, last I checked the European Honey Bee was native, but I guess you could prefer bumblebees?

[–] [email protected] 21 points 5 months ago (3 children)

They’re “invasive” if you’re not on Eurasia.

Humans took them everywhere else.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 months ago (2 children)

They're native to Africa, Europe, West Asia & Central Asia, which covers around 3 billion people

East & South Asia have the Asiatic Honey Bee which is closely related enough that their introduction wouldn't disrupt the ecosystem as they fill the same niche in the same way

That leaves only around 15% of the global population somewhere European Honey Bees even have potential to become invasive, so it's a safe bet that they aren't for most people

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

“Only the colonized need fear the colonizer”

Native to PARTS of Africa, PARTS of Asia.

Not native to any of the island nations.

Not native to the Americas.

More to the point they wouldn’t be as widespread as they are without human intervention.

I am generally all for the pollinators of any kind but this meme has a good point and few people actually know that the honeybee is only prominent in its place because of humans.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Apis mellifera is a much better pollinator for most cultivars produced by agriculture around the world, so it's been introduced into East, South and Southeast Asia too (and it's pretty closely related to Apis cerana anyway, and they get along OK).

Also, you're not accounting for species uniqueness, which is highest in Australia/NZ/PNG, southern Africa and parts of South America. These places also have native bees that are outcompeted and outright attacked by Eurobees.

The truth is complicated, but also simple - this invasive species we tolerate and even introduce because it massively benefits food production for humans.

[–] BarbecueCowboy 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

That brings up an interesting point, they've been here 400 years, at one point does something stop being classified as invasive?

If we say never, then the term invasive kind of loses all meaning, but I wonder where the logical cutoff might be and how it's defined.

[–] KISSmyOSFeddit 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

A commonly used definition of a non-native species in ecology is if it was introduced by human activity after the year 1492. Because the "discovery" of the Americas by the larger European society kicked off an age where humans started to travel to other continents much more than before, bringing animals and plants with them.

Invasive species are non-native species that out-compete and displace native species.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 5 months ago

They are actively spread by people even know and they are pushing other species to extinction, but yeah, maybe let's not call them invasive and solve the problem that way.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

That seems a bit like complaining that cattle are replacing native deer.

They may occupy the same niche, but one feeds people and the other does not.

[–] fireweed 18 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Yeah but people don't make a big deal about "save the deer!" and then start a cattle ranch

[–] SparrowRanjitScaur 2 points 5 months ago

When people talk about saving the bees they usually mean the ones responsible for feeding us.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 5 months ago

Because deer are also invasive and aren't needed for cattle breeding. Not a great analogy

[–] uienia 5 points 5 months ago

Peak US defaultism going on in here.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (2 children)
[–] veganpizza69 4 points 5 months ago

OP is correct

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

Varroa mite has entered the chat

[–] fireweed 1 points 5 months ago

This is one reason why I love my native lupine plants. They occasionally get honeybee visitors, but I've noticed honeybees struggle with getting the flowers open to access the nectar. Bumblebee lands and his big fat body causes the flower to open right up. Gee it's almost like they co-evolved!