1rre

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 14 hours ago

LLMs have a very predictable and consistent approach to grammar, punctuation, style and general cadence which is easily identifiable when compared to human written content. It's kind of a watermark but it's one the creators are aware of and are seeking to remove. That means if you want to use LLMs as a writing aid of any sort and want it to read somewhat naturally, you'll have to either get it to generate bullet points and expand on them yourself, or get it to generate the content then rewrite it word for word in a style you'd write it in.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Intel Arc also works surprisingly fine and consistently for ML if you use llama.cpp for LLMs or Automatic for stable diffusion, it's definitely much closer to Nvidia in terms of usability than it is to AMD

[–] [email protected] 16 points 15 hours ago

Docker fan mindset

[–] [email protected] 13 points 22 hours ago

This isn't capitalism, it's more cronyism where the government takes on all the risk but outsources any profit to private companies

If it were capitalism, the full system would've collapsed over covid where there weren't enough passengers. If it were socialism, it'd probably be largely the same given the number of lines that do lose money, but at least the profitable ones like the London-Birmingham/Manchester routes would be adding money to the government instead of private companies

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 days ago

It's not even clinical, it's used as a shortening of "female patient" or "female subject" or whatever, especially when lady or woman (which refer only to adult female humans) aren't universally clear, but people who use it as a noun outside of those contexts are just using nonstandard English, and generally socially inacceptable nonstandard English at that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

And potentially an hours wait while your bag sits outside in the rain at your destination while you could be on your way home/to the hotel?

I can't imagine anyone actively wanting to volunteer for that unless they have a 3h transfer to another airline/mode of transport or something like that

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

What OS doesn't do that, even linux has xdg dirs

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The channel tunnel needs to be open at night, night bus is already a great way to travel benelux/rheinland to london but imagine a Berlin/Barcelona/Milan to UK night train it'd be great

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

They're native to Africa, Europe, West Asia & Central Asia, which covers around 3 billion people

East & South Asia have the Asiatic Honey Bee which is closely related enough that their introduction wouldn't disrupt the ecosystem as they fill the same niche in the same way

That leaves only around 15% of the global population somewhere European Honey Bees even have potential to become invasive, so it's a safe bet that they aren't for most people

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago (11 children)

Idk, last I checked the European Honey Bee was native, but I guess you could prefer bumblebees?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The correct plural is actually wug, or dialect weg.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The issue there is it benefits the current largest party

A system where all parties with >1% vote share get a fixed budget, with parties lower than that being required to source their own funding but not being allowed to spend more than the budget would be better as it'd allow for any realistic contender to not be as corrupt

Update:
I realised this would screw over regional parties like plaid & all Northern Irish parties... A system where funding is given per-seat but with a threshold of 5% of votes in that seat (same as to get your deposit back) would be better

180
minion rule (discuss.tchncs.de)
 
73
That's not my name (discuss.tchncs.de)
 
-34
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by [email protected] to c/fediverse
 

Meta exist to make a profit, however they're never going to be able to advertise to most people in the fediverse, who also happen to be some of the most knowledgeable people in some fields. If they accept that they're never going to be able to advertise to those people, they go for the next best thing: monetising their content. Some here may rightfully have an issue with a corporation monetising their content, however by federating with the fediverse and being the first company able to monetise the content within it, Meta have a vested interest in not extinguishing the fediverse.

Complain about their privacy violations or them monetising content they don't generate as much as you want, but remember they're smart & money hungry, and the smartest thing they can do in their position is to make money out of people they otherwise wouldn't be able to.

view more: next ›