this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2024
256 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19296 readers
2086 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The trips, taken in 2019, were earlier revealed by ProPublica, but it is the first time that Justice Thomas has included them on his financial disclosures.

top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dhork 97 points 7 months ago (2 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Clarence Thomas is still a corrupt asshole.


The original article had a shitload of words, my summary only has seven. I'm an actual human, I swear!

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I'm an actual human, I swear!

I don't know about that, let's see what a selfidentified bot thinks.

!isbot [email protected]

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

What the heck, an exclamation mark links to communities. TIL

[–] [email protected] 25 points 7 months ago

When his form was released to the public, Justice Thomas included an unusual addendum, a statement defending his acceptance of gifts from Harlan Crow, a real estate magnate in Texas and a donor to conservative causes. He had “inadvertently omitted” information on earlier forms, the statement said, which also sought to justify his decision to fly on private jets. He stated that he had been advised to avoid commercial travel after the leak of the draft opinion overturning Roe v. Wade.

So saying he has "acknowledged" them is being very generous. He's still making excuses and not taking responsibility for breaking the rules.

Including the advise about avoiding commercial travel after the Dobbs draft leaked is a non sequitur I'm having a really hard time not interpreting as a dog whistle to a political audience. Sure, avoid commercial travel, but include the gift of travel in your documentation. Why bring up Dobbs except to hint that he believes he's being persecuted for doing his job, despite the fact that the binding, precedent-setting opinion has no legal basis at all. That's not my conclusion, because my personal conclusion would be garbage since I'm not an expert. That's the conclusion of countless legal experts and the dissenting justices.

But sure, you were so rattled by this unprecedented persecution of a sitting justice that you "inadvertently" omitted huge gifts from conflicts of interest in your disclosure forms. You still did it, so take responsibility.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I misread the title as 2,019 trips were paid by Harlan Crow, and honestly wasn't surprised that the amount of corruption was that high.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Those luxury RVs don't pay for themselves. You expect Clarence Thomas to take away our basic human rights and subvert democracy in a regular RV?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

The RV was only about 6% of the total haul Thomas took in.

[–] AbidanYre 2 points 7 months ago

I suspect he would do it for free.

[–] b3an 17 points 7 months ago

He feels so pressures about what he did that he gave an addendum defending himself. It basically says he needed those private flights because of Roe v Wade draft leaks. 🙄 Corrupt ass judges with no real accountability

[–] AA5B 12 points 7 months ago

Disclosing the bribes is a decent beginning, but lying about the bribes for the last 5+ years should have already meant jail time

[–] Sanctus 9 points 7 months ago

So we gonna start protesting this corruption by flooding our streets or what? Look at that shit, corruption in full view just out there. I'm so tired of this erosion of trust.

[–] Rapidcreek 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The worst part is he can't fathom why it might call his impartiality into question

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago

He knows full well why.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

Who CARES? It's not like Harlan Crow is financing cases in front of the Supreme Court that if ruled in his favor would CRIPPLE your Freedoms as Americans!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Justice Clarence Thomas acknowledged on Friday additional luxury travel he had accepted from a conservative billionaire, amending a previous financial disclosure to reflect trips he had taken to an Indonesian island and a secretive all-male club in the Northern California redwoods.

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson reported receiving four concert tickets valued at about $3,700 from Beyoncé and $10,000 of artwork for her chambers from the Alabama artist and musician Lonnie Holley.

The financial disclosures, released yearly, are one of the few public records available about the justices’ lives, providing select details of their activities outside the court.

Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. was granted an extension this year, said the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts, which offers support for the federal judiciary and handles the financial records.

When his form was released to the public, Justice Thomas included an unusual addendum, a statement defending his acceptance of gifts from Harlan Crow, a real estate magnate in Texas and a donor to conservative causes.

Still the lack of enforcement mechanism or a process to handle ethics complaints drew criticism, as did the absence of any specific restrictions on gifts, travel or real estate deals.


The original article contains 473 words, the summary contains 194 words. Saved 59%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] Nooodel 1 points 7 months ago

Can we just add a sponsorship disclaimer to everything he does? Clarence Thomas - b(r)ought to you by Harlan Crow - Or - legal represantative of H. Crow - Or as a short form just Clarence Thomas (Crow)?