this post was submitted on 20 May 2024
31 points (81.6% liked)

politics

18937 readers
3062 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

WASHINGTON, May 20 (Reuters) - U.S. President Joe Biden on Monday slammed the International Criminal Court prosecutor's application for arrest warrants for senior Israeli officials including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, calling the move "outrageous".

"And let me be clear: whatever this prosecutor might imply, there is no equivalence - none - between Israel and Hamas. We will always stand with Israel against threats to its security." Biden said in a statement.

His top aide Secretary of State Antony Blinken also criticized the move, raising questions over the court's jurisdiction as well as its process in making this application. He added that it could jeopardize negotiations to achieve a hostage deal and a ceasefire.

all 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] givesomefucks 26 points 4 months ago (1 children)

If you're wondering why:

The American Israel Public Affairs Committee delivered more than $3.7 million in November to the campaigns of U.S. lawmakers, the most it has ever doled out in a single month, according to a new filing with the Federal Election Commission.

https://truthout.org/articles/fec-filing-shows-aipac-made-record-donations-to-congress-in-november/

3.7 million in the month after the attack across the board to both parties.

4.2 million to Biden since 1990, over a million more than second place,

https://www.opensecrets.org/industries/summary?cycle=All&ind=Q05&recipdetail=S

You may recognize number 2 as the guy with closest full of gold currently under FBI investigation, 3 as one of the least popular presidential candidates in America history. And then party leaders from both sides of the aisle.

Our government was bought and paid for, now Israel is calling in it's debts

[–] [email protected] 19 points 4 months ago

The tail is wagging the dog. This is the natural growth of the military industrial complex

That is money the US gave Israel in the first place for the purpose of imperialism, a portion coming back to fund the campaigns of politicians that further enable that is a facet of that.

[–] Ensign_Crab 26 points 4 months ago

The only outrage is that it didn't happen sooner.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

So I agree with the statement that the state of Israel and the terrorist organization Hamas are not equivalent. That doesn't mean both can't be committing evil, criminal acts. Both are embracing evil tactics in this fight.

Of course an aggressor terrorist organization is not equivalent with a legitimate nation defending itself from attack. But when the nation goes on to commit terrible evil, even in the name of self-defense, that deserves to be answered with justice.

Pro-genocide down-voters cordially invited to fuck themselves with a fork sideways.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Except Israel isn't a legitimate nation, they're a colonialist apartheid state

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

I guess one can quibble about the definition of legitimate, but it is the elected representative government of a population. That's a far cry from a terrorist organization.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago

Hamas is also the elected representative government of a population. Not recently elected mind you, but they were elected

[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 months ago (2 children)

here is no equivalence - none - between Israel and Hamas.

A week ago he is saying that Israel may have used bombs to commit human rights violations, suddenly that evidence doesn't exist?

Is the dementia hitting Biden that hard?

[–] Viking_Hippie 14 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Exclusive footage of Biden realizing that the bombs he was sending to a bunch of genocidal maniacs might be used to commit genocide:

[–] jordanlund 12 points 4 months ago

Outrageous they haven't done it sooner?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago

He's correct. There is no comparison between Israel and Hamas.

Israel has much more blood on its hands.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago

Literally the meme where he's asking if he might be wrong, but decides that no, the it's everyone else that is wrong.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago

Biden can suck a left nut. It's past time there be consequences.