this post was submitted on 19 May 2024
612 points (97.2% liked)

tumblr

3404 readers
507 users here now

Welcome to /c/tumblr, a place for all your tumblr screenshots and news.

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Must be tumblr related. This one is kind of a given.

  4. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.

  5. No unnecessary negativity. Just because you don't like a thing doesn't mean that you need to spend the entire comment section complaining about said thing. Just downvote and move on.


Sister Communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
all 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 70 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Really captures how I feel about companies that use LGBT support to advertise their products.

They’d have ads condemning it if it was profitable.

[–] Seleni 20 points 5 months ago

The thing you have to understand is companies don’t have morality. They only have three purposes: get the money, get the money, and get the money. Despite legislation to the contrary, companies are not people and you probably shouldn’t expect them to act like people.

(I just consider it a win if they choose to do something, anything, moral.)

But, since they will almost always put money first, what they are is a good barometer for society, and much more accurate read on society than polls.

50 years ago, hell, even 30 years ago, you would never have caught them dead putting a rainbow on their packaging and saying they ‘support LGBTQA+’, because popular societal sentiment would have crucified them and they would have lost money.

Today, these same corporations feel safe slapping rainbow flags on everything. That means the views of society are changing as well.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

"Deviation from the norm will be punished, unless it is exploitable."

[–] [email protected] 51 points 5 months ago (1 children)

This is clearly a deepfake. A real corporation would never risk a PR disaster by suggesting that people should fight for more rights.

[–] Anomaline 41 points 5 months ago (2 children)

tbqh I kinda like seeing LGBT iconography in public so I'll take the pandering instead of joining conservatives in dunking on it in these cases

I'll concede that I wish plenty of those companies would do more, though.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It pisses conservatives off the more LGBTQ is seen supported in public, so that's a bonus.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Imagine basing your political ideology on whatever pisses people off.

And then you wonder why people don't like you.

[–] 0laura 1 points 4 months ago

It's not my goal to piss people off, but seeing people that hate me for basically no reason get angry because they're reminded of my existence gives me schadenfreude

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

i don't have a problem with the branding honestly.

Companies doing it is rather funny, and doesn't ultimately do much. But the fact that they're doing it is still rather interesting.

[–] Cosmonaut_Collin 35 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Aperture science would probably discover what brain patterns, hormones, and molecular alignments determine the sexuality and gender identification of a person and then start experimenting on people to create new sexualities and genders.

[–] kshade 16 points 5 months ago

And when the boss finds out about that ground-breaking research he'll probably want to make an even better gay bomb with it.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago

And then make a genderswap gun, complete with tests for it and a rogue AI

[–] [email protected] 34 points 5 months ago (4 children)

We're just another demographic for them to study and experiment on.

And now I wonder how brutal an Aperture Science dildo test would be. 😵‍💫

[–] Sterile_Technique 31 points 5 months ago (1 children)

"Cave Johnson here. I have bad news, and I have good news. The bad news is that the AI we developed for our melee sentry turret concept developed a targeting error due to misinterpreting the verbal input 'aim for center mass'. We think it misheard the last word. It only ever delivered nonfatal injuries to the test subjects rectal regions.

The good news is that one of our interns replaced the knife with a dildo and stationed one in his supervisor's office along with a scathing resignation letter. The supervisor reported faster and more intense prostatic stimulation than any sex toy currently on the market - apparently this guy's a connoisseur! HA!

The turrets have all been refitted with different sizes and shapes of dildos, and tight little studded leather vests. Testing will resume tomorrow morning: we're rebranding and exploring its potential for the sex toy industry.

Also find that intern, we need to get him back as a paid employee - that type of innovative thinking shouldn't go to waste!"

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In 16 points 5 months ago

The lube was a lie

[–] xpinchx 4 points 5 months ago

Segmentation*

We're seeing a 17% lift this quarter, the shareholders will be pleased and our CEO should be able to get his 3rd yacht. 👌

[–] 0laura 1 points 4 months ago
[–] [email protected] 20 points 5 months ago (1 children)

That was a joke, haha, fat chance.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

... Anyway, this cake is great! It's so delicious and moist.

[–] Viking_Hippie 16 points 5 months ago

Cue Republican AstroTurf movement to force Aperture to congratulate heterosexuals

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago

This is my favorite take on that. Great cosplay of Glados.

https://files.catbox.moe/d8y9lc.mp4

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago

This is perfect. Case in point Blizzard who also did this. It's all about the bottom line and nothing else.

[–] cmbabul 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Was I supposed to read this in JK Simmons voice? Because i did

[–] Agent641 5 points 5 months ago

I read everything in JK Simmons voice.