this post was submitted on 17 May 2024
840 points (99.0% liked)

Science Memes

11086 readers
2932 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 69 points 6 months ago (5 children)

cam someone spoon-feed me this meme? i don't get it.

[–] [email protected] 198 points 6 months ago (4 children)

All plants require different levels nutrients to grow. If the same plant is grown repeatedly in the same soil then the soil will run out of the nutrients that plant needs and growing that plant becomes difficult. By rotating through plants with different nutrient requirements, the soil can maintain a sustainable balance of nutrients.

We now use the scientific method to argue ideas, but in the past ideas could just be laughed at if people thought they sounded dumb. People laughed at ideas like the sun being the center of the solar system and doctors needing to wash their hands before surgery. Refusal to accept these ideas held humanity back from technological advancement.

[–] reattach 45 points 6 months ago

Good explanation. Crop rotation also decreases plant diseases and insect damage.

[–] Anticorp 37 points 6 months ago (2 children)

People didn't just laugh at those ideas, they actively punished the people who proposed them.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Execution is punishment? 🧐

[–] Anticorp 11 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Would you consider it a reward?

[–] DeletesItLater 4 points 6 months ago

Pros and cons.

[–] eskimofry 2 points 6 months ago

Well you don't have to witness utter morons destroying the planet...

[–] Neon 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)
[–] xantoxis 11 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Because change is costly and therefore a risk. When it seems that resources are scarce, risks are dangerous, and it can seem rational to destroy ideas that cost more resources, lest your imagined model of society collapse for lack of resources as the idea takes over.

It's always conservatism, in other words.

[–] ThatWeirdGuy1001 6 points 6 months ago

Let's not take the religious aspects out of it though.

The church said earth was the center so saying the sun was the center was going against the church which was blasphemy. Blasphemy punishable by lifelong imprisonment or death.

Likely both as dungeons weren't exactly life friendly.

[–] JJROKCZ 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Because many considered any change to be an affront to Gods will. So they killed free-thinkers to prove God infallible

[–] Anticorp 2 points 6 months ago

Because they challenged the notion that mankind is the center of and purpose for the universe.

[–] Woovie 4 points 6 months ago

I feel like this is something that would happened at one of my past shitty jobs or in a crappy friend group.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

We now use the scientific method to argue ideas, but in the past ideas could just be laughed at if people thought they sounded dumb.

Used to before the whole covid scam anyway. Now it's "trust the science" which of course is an oxymoron. The whole point of science is that we don't trust it, we verify it. And that wasn't allowed.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

You can't really grow the same crop in the same field season after season (without fertiliser), because they'll sap the specific nutrients they need from the soil. If you do that over and over eventually the soil wont have any food for that crop. Growing something different each season that takes different nutrients from the soil lets it recover the other ones. I don't know how it recovers on its own, circle of life stuff probably. Modern farming can cheat by artificially replenishing the nutrients with fertiliser.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 months ago

It also makes it stronger against disease.

[–] JJROKCZ 2 points 6 months ago

The problem is that even with crop rotation much of our soil is still nearly depleted. Most farmers aren’t doing enough varied rotation or rest cycles or regenerative farming since anything other than the same 2-3 crops isn’t profitable for them

[–] MehBlah 41 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Unobservant idiots will always try to hold progress back.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago

"Science progresses at the march of funerals" as they say

[–] SpruceBringsteen 19 points 6 months ago

As others have said, a monoculture will drain those specific nutrients.

Beans are kinda special being a nitrogen fixer. Lot of plants will drain nitrogen so we fertilize as supplement.

Plant beans, squash, and corn together and you won't need to rotate your fields and the plants will form a sort of symbiosis working together.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 6 months ago

If she's the mean girl of agricultural history I image there's also a prehistoric nerds table, planting the 3 sisters in an out of the way field. So they have a place to hang out on their own while getting laughed at for it.

[–] SanndyTheManndy 9 points 6 months ago

thankfully, the assholes used to die off pretty quick back then.

[–] xantoxis 4 points 6 months ago

It doesn't matter, if it was a good idea 17 other people also had it and at least one of them is a big enough asshole to try it

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

How am I supposed to eat beans while watching Cars 2 now?