this post was submitted on 14 May 2024
139 points (95.4% liked)

World News

37280 readers
3935 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Reserves 10 times the North Sea’s output raise fears over drilling in protected region

Russia has found vast oil and gas reserves in the Antarctic, much of it in areas claimed by the UK.

The surveys are a prelude to bringing in drilling rigs to exploit the pristine region for fossil fuels, MPs have warned.

Reserves totalling 511bn barrels of oil – about 10 times the North Sea’s entire 50-year output – have been reported to Moscow by Russian research ships, according to evidence given to the Commons Environment Audit Committee (EAC) last week.

It follows a series of surveys by the Alexander Karpinsky vessel, operated by Rosgeo – the Russian agency charged with finding mineral reserves for commercial exploitation.

Antarctica is meant to be protected by the 1959 Antarctic Treaty that bans all mineral or oil developments. The UK’s interests are overseen by the Foreign Office – but it has been accused of ignoring the emerging crisis.

all 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Bookmeat 74 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Why are people doing resource exploration in protected areas? >___>

[–] [email protected] 54 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)
[–] Bookmeat 11 points 1 month ago
[–] RedditWanderer 8 points 1 month ago

Yeah they should have never been allowed to search there in the first place.

[–] Num10ck 2 points 1 month ago

what's 500 billion times $78?

[–] eran_morad 71 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Yeah, fuck it, ima go ahead and just say it:

The US should lead a vast effort by the West (broadly construed to include allies like Australia, Japan, etc.) to deploy all covert means and significant overt means, short of a shooting war, to destabilize and ultimately destroy the russian state.

Fuck russia. A million times over, then once more, for good measure, fuck russia.

Macron, Scholz: it is going to be on you to lead if the most fucktarded of my compatriots succeed in their “real men wear diapers” campaign. FFS.

russia is a cancer on the entire world.

[–] Grimy 6 points 1 month ago

I'm not saying it's a bad move, but that won't stop drilling.

The effort should be aimed at destroying the oil industry.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

deploy all covert means and significant overt means, short of a shooting war, to destabilize and ultimately destroy the russian state.

While they kind of maybe wanted that, they fear all the nukes getting to worse hands than they already are right now. At least Putin is sane enough to not use them, but more extreme leader might.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Mfw u say Russia is cancer but USA isn't

[–] Bernie_Sandals 1 points 1 month ago

That feeling when you're so brain fucked by the cold war actions of the U.S that the Authoritarian reactionary hellscape is good apparently.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago

Pay no mind to the effect this will have on climate change if they decided to plunder this crap

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago

areas claimed by the UK.

Due to Antarctic treaties, the claim should be effectively inoperative as long as the UK is a member, and Russia shouldn't be extracting mineral resources as long as Russia is a member.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antarctic_Treaty_System

The Antarctic Treaty was signed in 1959 by 12 nations and came into effect in the mid-1960s. The central ideas with full acceptance were the freedom of scientific research in Antarctica and the peaceful use of the continent. There was also a consensus for demilitarization and the maintenance of the status quo. The treaty prohibits nuclear testing, military operations, economic exploitation, and territorial claims in Antarctica. It is monitored through on-site inspections. The only permanent structures allowed are scientific research stations. The original signatory countries hold voting rights on Antarctic governance, with seven of them claiming portions of the continent and the remaining five being non-claimants. Other nations have joined as consultative members by conducting significant research in Antarctica. Non-consultative parties can also adhere to the treaty. In 1991-1992, the treaty was renegotiated by 33 nations, with the main change being the Madrid Protocol on Environmental Protection, which prohibited mining and oil exploration for 50 years.[13]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protocol_on_Environmental_Protection_to_the_Antarctic_Treaty

Article 7 prohibits any activity relating to mineral resources, other than scientific research.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

oh boy here comes the war

[–] lemmyhavesome 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

If we were to burn another 500 billion barrels of oil, it would be game over for the planet.

[–] jorp 4 points 1 month ago

you have to start thinking quarterly. Imagine the quarterly profits

[–] Baphomet_The_Blasphemer 2 points 1 month ago

Screw the planet, just think of all the profit. ~ Oil exes probably

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago
[–] A_A 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

is it possible they found none but seek a way to attract investments ?

[–] AnUnusualRelic 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Aren't Russian speakers opressed in the British antartic territories?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Tally ho, time for the RN to sail to ~~the Falklands~~ Antarctica!

[–] grue 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You pretty much had it right the first time. The Falklands would likely be used as a staging area, being the closest British or allied territory to the part of Antarctica in question.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

True, although with Milei being as unpredictable as he is, maybe he'd offer a port for this venture.