this post was submitted on 12 May 2024
404 points (99.5% liked)

News

23598 readers
3122 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

...

According to new statistics from the Association of American Medical Colleges, for the second year in a row, students graduating from U.S. medical schools were less likely to apply this year for residency positions in states with abortion bans and other significant abortion restrictions.

Since the Supreme Court in 2022 overturned the constitutional right to an abortion, state fights over abortion access have created plenty of uncertainty for pregnant patients and their doctors. But that uncertainty has also bled into the world of medical education, forcing some new doctors to factor state abortion laws into their decisions about where to begin their careers.

Fourteen states, primarily in the Midwest and South, have banned nearly all abortions. The new analysis by the AAMC — a preliminary copy of which was exclusively reviewed by KFF Health News before its public release — found that the number of applicants to residency programs in states with near-total abortion bans declined by 4.2%, compared with a 0.6% drop in states where abortion remains legal.

Notably, the AAMC’s findings illuminate the broader problems abortion bans can create for a state’s medical community, particularly in an era of provider shortages: The organization tracked a larger decrease in interest in residencies in states with abortion restrictions not only among those in specialties most likely to treat pregnant patients, like OB-GYNs and emergency room doctors, but also among aspiring doctors in other specialties.

all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 75 points 7 months ago (7 children)

If you had to choose the possibility of a murder charge and capital punishment for following your oath or simply not, why would anyone opt for the former?

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 59 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Shocker. Who could have seen this coming?!

[–] Cosmonauticus 31 points 7 months ago
[–] RestrictedAccount 58 points 7 months ago (2 children)

How long until one of those GOP dipshits tries to pass a law to require that Doctors cannot leave their states?

[–] barsquid 18 points 7 months ago

Have you ever seen a libertarian screeching about how regulations and licensing is the sole determining factor making medical care expensive? I think Repubs will remove medical licensing.

Otherwise banning travel between states is too unconstitutional even at the current corruption level of SCOTUS. Maybe if they can get another couple of Clarences they could do it.

[–] SacralPlexus 14 points 7 months ago

I doubt it will come to this. Instead what they will do is pass laws so that mid level providers can legally practice like physicians. Just make physicians unnecessary. Hospitals love it because PAs are way cheaper to employ. Everyone wins (except for the patient but we don’t need to think about that).

[–] jeffw 47 points 7 months ago (1 children)

We already have a dire shortage of medical practitioners, especially in rural areas. And some of the states with these bans have a lot of rural areas.

[–] disguy_ovahea 32 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Soon we’ll need Doctors Without Borders to start operations within the US.

[–] athairmor 14 points 7 months ago

They’d get shot trying to cross.

[–] jeffw 7 points 7 months ago

To be fair, it’s a French organization I believe. So we are an international area they could send aide to

[–] bitchkat 3 points 7 months ago

I thought they already were going to send their ships to the US Gulf coast?

[–] UnderpantsWeevil 34 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

My sister is overseas and planning to come back stateside in a few years. She wanted to move back to Texas to be close to the rest of the family but says, "I can't risk living in Texas if I want to have more kids". My friend's gyno gave her the hard sell on having her tubes tied recently, because there's nothing that can be done for her if she gets pregnant. I know a guy who works in a Houston ER, who is getting increasingly weird policies from his administrators when it comes to treating pregnant patients, because nobody wants to risk taking on liability for a miscarriage or still birth.

These are all the "unforeseen" consequences of the new abortion laws. And it certainly doesn't help that states with shit abortion laws already had 50-300% higher maternal mortality rates and infant mortality rates before these laws were passed.

The so-called pro-life agenda is directly leading to few people having kids and more people losing access to health care.

Pro-Life is going to get a ton of people killed.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

“Elections have consequences”

This particular article though- their seventh child? fucking chill.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 7 months ago

It feels like Republicans have realized the only way to retake a majority vote is to ensure the maximum number of deaths; aka a culling.

Followed by waiting out a generation of unnecessary/preventable deaths in the working class, and ensure the next generations are even worse uninformed. Leaving few aware of how the world used to be.

Thankfully, a brave select few are driving our species off a cliff. So, our industrial age will be a plastic skid-mark in the underwear of Earth’s fossil record for the next major species to find. /s

[–] Daft_ish 5 points 7 months ago
[–] eran_morad 5 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I guess the degens should go fuck themselves with a wad of rubles.

[–] barsquid 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I wish it only harmed degens. This utterly predictable consequence makes medical care even more inaccessible in those states. Mostly for disadvantaged women, many of whom voted against this shit.

[–] eran_morad 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Yep. Sad. Repubs have always been about oppressing women.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil 7 points 7 months ago

Its more the reverse.

US anti-abortion hysteria bled into Russian politics over the last decade. A country that had some of the most progressive women's health care laws in the world has been rolling them back at a rapid clip, thanks to lobbying from western evangelicals and their billionaire white nationalist sponsors.