this post was submitted on 03 May 2024
153 points (96.4% liked)

PC Gaming

7581 readers
599 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] glimse 75 points 2 months ago (6 children)

I feel kind of lame dying on this hill but I was going to finally buy this game this weekend and now I'm on the fence

[–] RGB3x3 62 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Don't feel lame. I'm not buying it now. Requirements like these are taking over gaming and it's asinine.

I'm not creating a new account for every new game I want to play. Ubisoft, Rockstar, EA, Sony, Microsoft... It's absolutely maddening.

Half the reason companies do this is to spam your email address, track you, and sell your data.

[–] glimse 15 points 2 months ago

Yeah...not sure why I'd ever make a new PlayStation account to play a game on my PC...I haven't had a console since the PS3 (and it was my roommate's so no account)

[–] kaffiene 9 points 2 months ago

I want to play but not with a rootkit

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I played for 90 hours, it's fun. But like many games where the narrative is determined by hundreds of thousands of people, it suffers from the Marvel Studios problem where nothing ever happens. The aliens destroy X planet and it gets rebuilt and everyone moves back. No attacks on super earth, two enemy types, mostly the same set of planets.

The gameplay loops are fun, but I have most stuff unlocked and was hoping the robots would really make an incursion, or the bugs would attack super earth. So far though, no dice.

For $40 and 90 hours of play, I can't complain. It just doesn't feel like it has the staying power of a DRG though.

[–] BluesF 3 points 2 months ago

Yeah, I was initially invested in the whole meta narrative, but when we wiped out the bots and they just... Came back again lmao, I lost interest somewhat. I'll still dip in here and there, it's a fun game, but I would have liked to see the campaign be more emergent and the missions actually reflect what's happening more.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I bought this game, then couldn't remember my PSN password, or recover my PSN account. Didn't realize it was optional. But I got a Steam refund.

[–] glimse 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Please do not make me jump through extra hoops to play your games, devs.

Even Paradox didn't make me create an account to play C:S and devs shouldn't aim lower than Paradox lol

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

I read that the devs didn't make this choice. Apparently Sony did.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

I'm right there with you

[–] elrik -3 points 2 months ago

Buy it. The game is fun.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Doesn't sound very Democracy.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Actually, considering the themes of the game, this is very Democracy.

[–] Crackhappy 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You're confusing democracy with capitalism.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago

You are confusing what the game calls Democracy to what it actually is.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Ahh but what of Sony Managed Democracy?

I wonder who they will vote for me next year?!

[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Man I really really hate the state of gaming right now....pay to win, in game currency, DLCs, half ass games made... I liked this game but this is by far stupid and makes no sense for me to continue playing. I honestly shouldn't have to worry about "account linking" when buying a game on steam.

This feels like a bait and switch, why wasnt this mandatory and upfront from the beginning? They knew that would hurt sales.....

[–] wildcardology 5 points 2 months ago

As I understand it, it's in the TOS and it was not implemented on launch because of "bugs".

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

made a PSN account, verifying my email doesn't work -- just never sends an email no matter how many times I tell it to resend, I know the email works and I know it's not in my spam folder. Can't verify, can't link accounts. Guess if Sony doesn't fix their site or reverse course, I'm done playing in a month + out the money I spent on the game. Sucks, had over 200 hours in it, but I guess every game dies sooner or later.

[–] ALilOff 3 points 2 months ago

I’m thinking they believe this will fix the ongoing cross play issue, but from the sounds of it made things worse.

Me and my friends easily put in 50+ hours in 2 weeks, and then cross play stopped working since the start of March and none of us have touched it since as we wanted to spread democracy with the squad.

[–] CluckN 22 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I don’t think Devs are to blame. Sony sent them engineers when servers were failing and are probably expecting some goodwill back.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Of course they are, they agreed to work with sony, they added or allowed sony to add this requirement.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago
[–] CleoTheWizard 2 points 2 months ago

Apparently this was always a planned feature but probably wasn’t ready for prime time at launch.

[–] asterfield 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I will find a way to refund or chargeback or something. I hate that they feel they can change the contract like this

[–] Maalus 8 points 2 months ago (3 children)

It's been "in the contract" since the beginning, they weren't enforcing it and you didn't read it

[–] Sanctus 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What about people who spent real money and don't have PSN in their region? Are they not legitimate customers with legitimate grievances? Or is that only for American consumers?

[–] Maalus -2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They most likely will be able to get a refund

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

Just like the people who lost access to the Discovery Channel content when Sony lost the rights to distribute? Wait a minute...

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

And people bought it while it wasn't being enforced so it's still sifting goalposts post-purchase.

[–] Maalus -3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That logic doesn't make sense. It is as if a cheater would justify using hacks by saying "you guys weren't enforcing it, so I am allowed to cheat" when all they were doing is grabbing all the cheaters for a banwave

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Well that's a shame because that's how things like copyright laws work. That's why companies like Nintendo are so overly litigious. Whether you like it or not, people bought Helldivers 2 and didn't need to have a PSN account to play it. Now Sony is making it so they do, several months after purchase and long after customers would typically be able to get a refund. Sony never gave information on the waived requirement coming back, customers could only possibly know there was originally a requirement for yet another third-party account that serves little purpose to the user and that requirement was waived. For months now players have been buying the game, launching it and actively playing it without once signing in to PSN. This is also going to cause a subset of owners to completely lose access to the game they legitimately bought because of Sony's short-sightedness to enforce a network requirement in countries that network simply doesn't exist. This is a case of moving the goalposts, arbitrarily removing content from legally-abiding customers and this isn't the first time. Maybe you've already forgotten the controversy with Discovery? This isn't a good look for Sony to be pulling content from clients twice within 6 months, no matter how different the means.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago

Yeah, in the fine print that nobody reads

[–] Krafting 15 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] wccrawford 39 points 2 months ago (7 children)

Is it a "review bomb" for complaining about a legit problem with the game that stops you from playing?

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Phegan 26 points 2 months ago

It's not review bombing if the criticisms are legitimate. Forcing people to link accounts multiple months into a game is a legitimate gripe.

[–] cmrn 13 points 2 months ago (2 children)

It’s easier than ever to never play a AAA game. The trend of launching games on broken promises with 14 prompts to spend money before you even reach the main menu is getting old.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

I don't think Helldivers would be considered AAA. Probably more like AA.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

My issue with this one wasn't that it promised anything, the game was launched normally it was enjoyable and then they pulled this crap.

[–] mrfriki 8 points 2 months ago

Sounds like the price for doing business with Sony PlayStation.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

On the plus side, I have rediscovered my joy of reading.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I guess this is the day I'm remembering my psn password.

[–] CMDR_Horn 21 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Don’t capitulate to terrorists. If everyone stops playing and buying they will reverse course.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Sony and AH CMs have crossed a line.

load more comments
view more: next ›