this post was submitted on 21 Apr 2024
-49 points (17.3% liked)

politics

19243 readers
2343 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 52 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Some young people are idiots

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

And some of those idiots are accelerationists.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago

Was about to say exactly that.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Some old people are idiots. Probably more.

Source: Is me, GenX.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Cool, but the article's about young people so not sure what you're trying to say.

[–] jeffw 2 points 8 months ago

It’s kinda whataboutism lol

[–] eran_morad 25 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Lol, a republican doing something good for people. You gotta be mentally defective to vote r.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 8 months ago

Some young people think Trump was the one that wrote the Covid stimulus checks himself out of his own account

I miss the days when news let people know what's going on, instead of picking a narrative and finding some idiots who already believe it and reporting that idiots believe it without weighing in on whether it's true

[–] wildcardology 11 points 8 months ago

How could they trust someone who bankrupted 3 casinos.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago

Some young people, some old people, some medium people. What a stupid headline. You can find "some people" that think anything.

[–] morphballganon 6 points 8 months ago

Another day, another fascist account to block.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago

Click bait, designed to rage engage, don't fall for it

[–] mraniki 3 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Reuters interviewed 20 people under the age of 30 to understand their support. The most common reason given for backing the former president was inflation and the perception the economy was not working for them, underscoring how the rise in prices for daily staples is more salient for some than high stock prices and low unemployment during the Biden years. […] At the same time, a majority said they agreed with Trump's reticence about aiding Ukraine in its war with Russia, an isolationist stance at odds with Biden's foreign policy agenda.

[–] youngGoku 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Ok so Trump was the one that gave out stimulus checks that sparked hyper inflation. Yet they see him as a solution to inflation?

Something's not adding up here.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

The common denominator is stupidity. These people have it in spades.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago

It's fair to say that stock prices being high does fuck all for most of us. But my agreement with this position ends there.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

old people don't have a monopoly on crazy or stupid regardless if its like the fox variant.

[–] jordanlund 2 points 8 months ago

"He supports Trump's pro-oil drilling stance"

The US is producing more oil under Biden than we did under Trump:

https://www.vox.com/climate/24098983/biden-oil-production-climate-fossil-fuel-renewables

"his opposition to gun control"

Trump has been notoriously anti-2nd Amendment:

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2021/10/14/fact-check-trump-made-comment-taking-guns-without-due-process/6070319001/

https://www.npr.org/2024/02/28/1234248032/supreme-court-bump-stocks

"and his pledge to crack down on illegal immigration."

Well, that's true. Could it be the support is just racism?

[–] babypigeon 2 points 8 months ago

Some young people (and probably some others of varying ages) have no idea of how a previous administration's policies and a global pandemic could have an effect on the current administration.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Sum Yung peephole

[–] [email protected] -5 points 8 months ago

Both are bad. One party wants to tell you what to do. The other party wants to tell you what to do more. And there is no party that doesn't want to tell you what to do. I just want people to stop fucking trying to tell me what to do. I can decide that for myself. Thank you very much. I don't think he'd win because only the two-party system can win, but I would vote libertarian if I were going to vote at all, which I'm not going to because it's fucking pointless. What I am going to do is take out loans with US dollars and put assets into other currencies like gold which will retain their value while the US dollar loses value and the loans get easier to pay. Like, take out a $5,000 personal loan and purchase gold with it. And your payment will be $100 per month. And you will have two ounces of gold. And the payments on the $100 debt will get easier to pay as inflation causes increases.