this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2024
96 points (99.0% liked)

196

16708 readers
2447 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Alt Text: Avi Wigderson, an Israeli-born mathematician, won what's known as "the Nobel Prize of computing" for his work on randomness.

all 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 25 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You jest but the kind of stuff this guy works on is actually really fascinating

[–] [email protected] 19 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I believe it. I had a professor in college who said if he found a genie he would wish for 3 different sets of truly random data lol

[–] twack 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Would they still be random after the genie gave them to him?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago

Okay, Schrodinger

[–] [email protected] 13 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

The just followed the rabbit hole that started with reading "teh pengu1n of d00m"

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

This was literally a talk this year at sigbovik https://twitch.tv/videos/2111841043 (skip to around 1hr 57 min)

[–] Deestan 12 points 8 months ago

It's a fascinating field! Simplified: Make a machine that it is impossible to guess the likely outcome of with odds larger than 50/50.

We are talking any tiny advantageous guess here. If I predict 50/50 that a coin will go heads up, slight imbalances will cause it to go heads on average 51 times out of 100 tosses. Play for a dollar a million times, and I'm rich.

And if I know roughly how you will toss the coin, I can improve my prediction another tiny amount by knowing which side was up when you lift it up to toss it.

The field is about making a process that successfuly hides information so I can't know what state the internal workings of the coin tosser is at any time. It has huge overlap with cryptography.

[–] slimarev92 11 points 8 months ago

Makes sense, it's very hard for computers to be really random.