this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2024
808 points (99.0% liked)

politics

19603 readers
3847 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ghostdoggtv 46 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The Grand Old Party is dead

[–] fluxion 22 points 10 months ago

And "Democratic" party has a much less subtle meaning

[–] [email protected] 39 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Seems when both parties in a 2 party-dominated system have unpopular candidates, the horse race ends up being purely about who turns off their base the least. Not who they impress or win over, but just how many votes one doesn't lose and the other does.

[–] rayyy 13 points 10 months ago

There is no comparison between the two except the MSM wants you to believe there is.

[–] postmateDumbass -2 points 10 months ago

A battle of brainwashing and propaganda.

[–] phreekno 26 points 10 months ago

Donald Trump is coasting to victory in Super Tuesday primaries across the country—a decisive, if not unexpected, showing that follows his overwhelming wins in GOP nominating contests in states like Iowa, New Hampshire, and Michigan earlier this year.

The former president—who tried to overturn the 2020 election and illegally hold on to power—is facing four indictments covering a whopping 91 criminal counts, and he owes half a billion dollars following multiple civil judgements handed down this year alone. But on Monday, the US Supreme Court gave him a key legal victory, ruling that he could remain on state presidential ballots despite his involvement in inciting the January 6 insurrection. And on Tuesday, he was once again dominating the GOP primaries, leading former UN ambassador Nikki Haley in nine of the 10 states reporting results as of 8:45 pm ET—in most cases by huge margins. (Haley held a narrow lead in deep-blue Vermont.) Prior to Tuesday, Trump has won every GOP contest with the exception of Washington, DC, where Haley received the support of roughly two-thirds of the 2,000 voters who participated.

Tuesday night’s results reaffirm what poll after poll had already shown: Trump wields a seemingly ironclad grip on the party, even as his first criminal trial is slated to begin later this month.

Haley has, up until now, nonetheless stubbornly refused to drop out, claiming that she has “no fear of Trump’s retribution.” But it remains to be seen if or how her crushing losses in Tuesday’s primaries will affect her campaign; she told reporters last week she was only “thinking about Super Tuesday.”

Tuesday’s results, if they hold throughout the evening, will all but guarantee that Trump will be the GOP nominee—though he won’t formally receive the party’s nomination until the national convention in July. Regardless, polls suggest it’s (basically) official: November’s election will present voters with a 2020 rematch—between Biden and Trump, and between democracy and authoritarianism.

[–] Theprogressivist 20 points 10 months ago (2 children)

He's dominating with only his base. That's not the win you think it is.

[–] grue 48 points 10 months ago (2 children)

"His base" (read: anti-American fascist traitors) is way too fucking big to for you to be that dismissive about it.

[–] samus12345 16 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

And it's not their numbers that makes them a threat, it's how the system is gamed that gives them grossly disproportionate representation.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I'd argue that the biggest threat is how much the DNC's actions continue to turn off young people. The GOP can't win an election... but the DNC can sure as hell lose one.

[–] kbotc 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Oh no, the people who never show up to vote are going to not show up to vote?

Every young group ever has had this idealized view that they’re the first group of people who invented the protest vote. Then they see the consequences of their lack of engagement and realize throwing their vote away is dumb. This time, it’ll be that nothing changes for the better in Palestine, but their lack of engagement has very real costs to their own access to birth control, air and water quality, and their LGBTQ+ friends all of the sudden have to go back into hiding when the Supreme Court overturns protections for gay marriage (they’ve already signaled they will) and there’s nothing they can do about it for 4 years.

Congrats on your tantrum.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 10 months ago

Yup, it fucking sucks... though, I would mention, when I was that age my big election was Bernie vs. Hillary and we did show up before the DNC just discarded our opinions and went with her anyways. I'm not bitter, no sireee.

Anyways, yea, it'd be great if young people didn't protest vote, but it'd also be great if old people weren't fucking assholes - the boomers have held onto their political majority for far too long due to the population dip of Gen X and, to a lesser extent, Millenials. Young people wouldn't have to show up if we got our shit together.

[–] grue 4 points 10 months ago

Make no mistake: their numbers are more than sufficient to destroy the country. Fascists don't need a majority in order to seize power, and MAGAs are a bigger percentage of the US population than the NAZIs ever were of Germany's.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

60 per cent of republiturds, the other percentage, despises him.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 10 months ago

Republican voters continue to live down to my expectations, I see. Fuckin’ embarrassing.

[–] Snapz 11 points 10 months ago

"Dominates" ... It's an uncontested race? They just had Haley stay in as a strawman so it could feel like something was won. Asinine bullshit.

[–] PoliticallyIncorrect 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

The fucked up thing it's people are voting for him, so I truly don't know what's actually most fucked up..

[–] 108 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

They reelected the Uvalde Sherif too

[–] hamid 5 points 10 months ago

Elections don't create fascist governments, material conditions do. The material conditions in the US are a guarantee of fascist government. The US decided to become the Nazis to fight the Soviets and we all lost the cold war

[–] nieceandtows 1 points 10 months ago

That's exactly why he's dominating.

[–] Hiro8811 1 points 10 months ago

Stan Pines?