387
This really bothers me. Closed standards locked behind a licensing fee may as well not be standards at all, in my opinion.
this post was submitted on 29 Feb 2024
387 points (99.2% liked)
Linux
48352 readers
575 users here now
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).
Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
- No misinformation
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
I don't understand why any hardware uses HDMI anymore anyway, what does it have that displayport doesn't?
HDMi foundation is founded by companies who own the home theatre environement (mainly movie conpanies and television) who puts DRM on HDMI to make it harder to illegally copy content like movies, ao they will always want to be anti open source because thats the request of streaming services/movie businesses. Its why for example, mobile devices have widevine levels. those levels basically determine how "unlocked" the device is and services will refuse to offer full functionality to unlocked devices because of it, be it audio or video.
Members of VESA, who control the displaypprt standard are generally computer companies are mostly not in the business of media, so they value specs over drm on changes, which for example a use case is that displayport allows for daisychaining diaplays.
The DRM is so stupid - now in the era of streaming you can get literally anything webripped day1.
DRM is obsolete (and it never really wasn't tbh).
DRM is not to stop pirates, but to show investors and licence holders you are trying to stop pirates.
its the attempt that matters more to investors than the pirates. its why a shit ton of games have denuvo, evem if the version of denuvo they utilized is cracked already or not. its not there for the end user, its there for the investors to show they are at least attempting to fight off piracy.
Denuvo is actually very effective relatively speaking. Several popular games that use it have never been cracked. They haven't made it impossible, just sufficiently difficult and tedious that no one wants to bother.
some aren't cracked because theres like only one person actually doing it, and said person wont crack anime games because she hates anime.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(2 replies)
I don't know a single person who has ever used HDMI to steal copyrighted content. Seriously? Who would rip a 2 hr move by watching it vs the 10 min it takes to rip a movie digitally.
Like shit ya got CAM, WebRIP, BRRIP and SCENE. I doubt HDMI was used in any of these scenarios.
technically speaking, every gamer who capture cards to bypass when games on PlayStation has an explicit mode that disables built in recording when a cutscene is active is an example.
@n3m37h @Dudewitbow HDMI consortium decides to f around and find out if people really care re: displayport vs hdmi
Decades of being the standard in a/v. That's like asking, why don't we get rid of gas stations and just install electric chargers? Well, everybody's got gas powered cars.
AV things sure since they stick around longer, but computers? When was the last time you saw a high end GPU with VGA or DVI? And they already usually have mostly DisplayPort with just one or two HDMI ports
Well, I wasn't referring to that ecosystem. That ecosystem is already on display port. The reason HDMI is so prevalent is because it's the standard in audio-visual equipment. Why would I talk about computer equipment when it's not the standard there?
The point still stands. Everybody has equipment that has HDMI, and to phase out that standard in equipment going forward is phasing out equipment people already own.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
HDMI only had about four good years to itself before DisplayPort showed up. In contrast, the RCA port stuck around for damn near 100 years.
We also didn't have digital signals till DVI in 1999, HDMI in 2002 and display port in 2006
Probably a lot more hardware using HDMI than DisplayPort? Just throwing a guess, tbh.
That being said, I might consider looking towards DisplayPort when I can get a new monitor...
CEC (technically I think displayport could support it, but generally isn't implemented) and ethernet up to 100Mbps.
Almost nothing uses ethernet over HDMI to my knowledge.
This is the first time I heard of Ethernet over HDMI and I can't tell if you're joking.
I think they mean HDMI over Ethernet, which is a real thing, but not something I've ever seen in real life.
No. Network over HDMI.
Nobody implements it, but its part of the standard
Feature-wise probably next to nothing, and it's usually behind one or two generations in terms of bandwidth. HDMI is often the only port available on TVs though, so GPU makers likely can't afford to just leave it out.
They should anyway. New tech TV's are all smart these days and the dumb ones are made for two decades ago. At this point we are better off with a PC monitor and separate speakers. Built in speakers are shit seemingly as a requirement. I use a video port switch for extra inputs without needing to use the on screen menus or just running out of built in ports.
load more comments
(2 replies)
eARC and 12gbp/s more bandwidth (4k@185hz vs 4k@120hz)
Otherwise the same
Your info is outdated. DP 2.0 is 80 Gbps can do 4K@240hz without display stream compression. It can do up to 16K@60hz using DSC.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
Alright AMD, just remove HDMI from your graphics cards and be done with it 🤷 . Fuck the HDMI forum.
As much as I want them to give HDMI the middle finger I don't think they have enough leverage in the GPU market to pull such a bold move off.
They could they just include a DP to HDMI adapter in the box and have no HDMI ports on the GPU maybe?
They’re currently what 15% of the market? Nvidia would happily swoop in and pick up some more market share.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Alright, displayport, here we come
I've been on the DP bandwagon since using my GTX 660Ti
I don’t think I’ve ever used hdmi by choice. It’s always been VGA > DVI > DisplayPort. The only times I use HDMI is consoles or stupid monitors either only 1 DP and a bunch of HDMI.
Why VGA and DVI? I had thought they were limited in their max resolution/refresh rate
load more comments
(1 replies)
These guys can go fuck themselves
So I see people on the phoronix forums complaining that this is a bad thing because they have TVs which are HDMI only. From what I read, the HDMI 2.1+ spec is only needed to support extreme cases like 4k@120Hz and above. So my question is how many people are there who have a TV old enough to have no display ports but be of that outrageous specification.
Edit : it seems I am mistaken in thinking that new TVs have display port.
I'm using a recent 42" LG OLED TV as a large affordable PC monitor in order to support 4K@120Hz+HDR@10bit, which is great for gaming or content creation that can appreciate the screen real estate. Anything in the proper PC Monitor market similarly sized or even slightly smaller costs way more per screen area and feature parity.
Unfortunately such TVs rarely include anything other than HDMI for digital video input, regardless of the growing trend connecting gaming PCs in the living room, like with fiber optic HDMI cables. I actually went with a GPU with more than one HDMI output so I could display to both TVs in the house simultaneously.
Also, having an API as well as a remote to control my monitor is kind of nice. Enough folks are using LG TVs as monitors for this midsize range that there even open source projects to entirely mimic conventional display behaviors:
I also kind of like using the TV as simple KVMs with less cables. For example with audio, I can independently control volume and mux output to either speakers or multiple Bluetooth devices from the TV, without having fiddle around with repairing Bluetooth peripherals to each PC or gaming console. That's particularly nice when swapping from playing games on the PC to watching movies on a Chromecast with a friend over two pairs of headphones, while still keeping the house quite for the family. That kind of KVM functionality and connectivity is still kind of a premium feature for modest priced PC monitors. Of course others find their own use cases for hacking the TV remote APIs:
So my question is how many people are there who have a TV old enough to have no display ports but be of that outrageous specification
As far as I know no consumer TV has Display port.
I bought a TV maybe 2-3 years ago that supports 4K@120 and it doesn't have a display port, only HDMI.
view more: next ›