Norris' complains about moving under braking were fine because max was doing that to a degree but his complains that max pushed him off when he outbroke himself and ended up going off were pretty pathetic. Neither driver came out looking good from that fight

Well he was punished when he broke the rule

Lando was ahead at the apex, Max should have backed out.

This was only because he broke so late that he did not make the apex and almost did not make the corner, certainly left no space for max. If that is how things will be, we will see max divebombing and going into people from now on because like Alonso he too takes advantage of dubious stewarding.

Why though clearly forced of track and he was well ahead going into the braking zone. Can't see why he should be penalized for avoiding contact

What is perez doing man. Verstappen had a slow stop, drove 2/3rds of the lap with a puncture, made an extra stop and had a 10 second penalty. Even after all that, he still finished 15+ seconds ahead of perez. Just how¿?

Well fitts law doesnt mention anything about asymmetrical spacing anywhere. Infact going by fitts law, the new gnome design is great because the hitboxes are pretty large

Where max looked like he took a pretty normal line

The line slightly different than his normal but nothing over the edge. I was shocked when palmer squarely claimed that Verstappen was the only one over the line and that Lando was never over it during the whole fight.

Well that was exciting at the end. The only thing missing are the long and tedious argument chains that would have been found on reddit with everybody arguing whose fault is it.

Do you people agree with Jolyon that Max going off the track to keep the position should have been a pen. The way I see it, Lando clearly pushes him off after the divebomb

Yeah that the erbff picture is massive (27.2 MB) in size and my educated guess is that it is messing with the loading time and the ram allocation.

Can you share any study for this. If this is true, it is fascinating and worth looking into in more depth

That same logic could be applied for the save and discard button. Should there be a bigger gap between them lest somebody misclick and discard things instead of saving them¿? Atleast in the case where they accidentally click cancel instead of discard, they are not losing any data.

Hell if this really about data safety, discard/don't save should be the isolated button because it is the only destructive option

Here's the thing: Apple's design you'll find that they carefully included an extra margin between the "Don't Save" and "Cancel" buttons. This avoid accidental clicks on the wrong button so that people don't lose their work when they just want to click "Cancel".

And gnome has those dialogs in a different colour to achieve easily noticable differentiation between the two options