this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2024
363 points (97.9% liked)

politics

19224 readers
2998 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

House Republicans reached a critical point this week in their bid to impeach Joe Biden: a closed-door interview with the President’s younger brother James. But the coveted testimony was dramatically overshadowed by another development: The Justice Department indicting one of the impeachment inquiry’s lead informants for lying to the FBI about the Biden family with dirt from Russian intelligence.

The revelation was the latest in a series of embarrassing setbacks for the House GOP’s impeachment effort. In July, one of its whistleblowers was arrested for acting as a Chinese agent. In August, Hunter Biden’s longtime associate Devon Archer—who House Oversight Chair James Comer said could become a “hero” of the probe—testified that President Biden had no involvement in his son’s business dealings. At the inquiry’s first public hearing in September, Comer’s star witness, conservative lawyer Jonathan Turley, said there wasn’t enough evidence to impeach Biden. And on Tuesday, federal prosecutors claimed that FBI informant Alexander Smirnov, who made false bribery allegations against President Biden and his son Hunter, had “extensive and extremely recent contacts” with the Kremlin.

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 93 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

I hate when articles headline with quotes like this. Unless these words are said by Jim Jordan or James Comer then it's literally not true. They're just gonna keep looking for evidence until they find something that'll stick. They're desperate to (A) make Trump's 2 impeachments seem like no big deal and (B) degrade Biden's reputation in the exact same way they did Hillary's.

The actual quote is from a Democrat, just FYI. That's how you know it's complete bullshit.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 9 months ago

Experts say, …

[–] hperrin 2 points 9 months ago

until they find something that'll stick

Or die trying.

[–] [email protected] 50 points 9 months ago (2 children)

How much of our tax dollars did they waste on this?

[–] WaxedWookie 2 points 9 months ago

From their perspective, the money was well spent - they got to use public funds to dishonestly slander and smear their political opponents. Now that it's fallen apart so catastrophically that people are being charged for their bullshit, they get to point to a deep-state conspiracy. They literally couldn't lose.

[–] Carrick1973 1 points 9 months ago

Just as much as they always waste, which is 100% of tax dollars that republicans are paid.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Can something never having gained substance or volume"collapse"?

[–] Drivebyhaiku 6 points 9 months ago

It had substance... Just in the form of dead trees in large collated stacks held together with the narrative equivalent of chewing gum. The soap bubble veneer encapsulating nothing but hot air

It doesn't matter. The Republicans have the conspiracy theorists in their pocket who have been so scepticism poisoned that they basically believe what they believe process or evidence be damned but are very good at creating red string webs based on the unproven negative space of the unproven but not impossible.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

Yeah, since it is usually measured on effort alone.

[–] homesweethomeMrL 21 points 9 months ago

So one key witness was an FBI agent indicted by the DoJ for being a russian shill, and the other key witness is an official agent of China? Seems legit.

[–] Newstart 15 points 9 months ago

Thanks for taking the bullet for the team by reading it and calling out their BS clickbait title. They won’t get my click.

[–] yesman 11 points 9 months ago

Nobody wants the House to move on Impeachment more than the Biden admin. The Republicans would be fools to put this obvious bullshit in the news-cycle for weeks in an election year. The only witness who doesn't contradict their narrative is a Russian agent.

Some in the House will push for it anyway. The crazies who don't have to worry about getting re-elected in their gerrymandered districts, and don't care about being in the majority. All they care about is re-tweets and bending a knee to the Donald. Impeachment is retribution and retribution is life.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 9 months ago

And Fox news will just stop talking about it like it never happened.

[–] Dkarma 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Thing based on fake news and gop bad faith turned fraud collapses?

Yeah and somebody's Heine is crowding my ice box.

Say it ain't so...

[–] Burn_The_Right 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Wait. You have human body parts in your freezer?

[–] homesweethomeMrL 1 points 9 months ago

Your love is a heart breaker