this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2024
91 points (98.9% liked)

Canada

7203 readers
249 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


๐Ÿ Meta


๐Ÿ—บ๏ธ Provinces / Territories


๐Ÿ™๏ธ Cities / Local Communities


๐Ÿ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


๐Ÿ’ป Universities


๐Ÿ’ต Finance / Shopping


๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ Politics


๐Ÿ Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A House of Commons committee is set to study legislation proposed by Independent Sen. Julie Miville-Dechรชne that would require Canadians to verify their age to access porn online.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] [email protected] 54 points 9 months ago (32 children)

At this point there are people in their forties who had access to online porn as minors. Have any actual studies been done to show that a significant portion of the many, many people who've grown up in the last 20-30 years have been harmed by having access to online porn while they were younger, or are these laws just something that's trendy at the moment?

[โ€“] [email protected] 45 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

I'm in my 50's and never had issues finding porn/alcohol/drugs when I was under 18, even though I was in a religious area for part of it.

These people are sniffing glue if they actually think this bill will do anything other than erode privacy.

At best all it will do is lead kids away from normal sites and towards the sketchy parts of the web where things get even weirder.

[โ€“] [email protected] 36 points 9 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

The goal is to erode privacy, and the pearl clutching about children is always the excuse. There are a lot of groups who want to eliminate privacy online: cops, copyright holders, and religious nuts to name a few. They're the ones driving this stuff.

[โ€“] [email protected] 15 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I'm kind of disappointed that the Ndp voted in favor of this bullshit plan.

[โ€“] [email protected] 11 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Ugh. I hadn't heard. I expected better, but the NDP have been a terrible disappointment in the last decade or so.

[โ€“] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago

Ya, it seems every time they take a step or two forward they somehow end up taking a step back again.

[โ€“] [email protected] 33 points 9 months ago (2 children)

There's a HUGE lobbying effort to convince the people in power that this is a good idea. Lots of tech-surveillance companies bidding for this to go through, so everyone is forced to use their services. You think identity theft is bad now? Wait until you need to put your ID on the internet and that gets leaked.

[โ€“] [email protected] 12 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

If age verification is really the intent then it ought to be possible to develop a service these websites can call into that gives some kind of zero-knowledge age check. The age check service doesn't need to know the identity of the service that's asking, and the requesting service doesn't need to know the identity of the person whose age they're checking. You'd authenticate on a site that only knows someone's doing an age check, and the verifying site would just get a token indicating that the age check was successful.

Am I missing some reason why this wouldn't be possible? It seems to be a problem ripe for zero-knowledge solutions.

If it is possible, there's really no need for an age check requirement to involve disclosing your identity to the site you're visiting, or to disclose your viewing habits to anyone. And if governments or lobbyists are pushing for everyone to upload their full identity to web sites, it suggests either they're ignorant or their motives aren't what they claim.

[โ€“] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago

This bill is a government login that sends an authentication string to the requesting website

[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Equivalent of CRA now or as an implementation that youโ€™re familiar with โ€œsign in with googleโ€

The worry security wise is less about it getting leaked as it is opening a new string of fake websites (because the government data getting leaked/attacked is already an issue)

[โ€“] [email protected] 15 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

"Sex harms the youth" has been established lore since the Victorian age, when hiding it in the first place was a new project driven by religious concerns. Nobody questions it because nobody wants to look like a pedophile (which, for the record, are bad).

[โ€“] Nouveau_Burnswick 10 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Harms the youth isn't even the best anti-pornography argument. Sexual exploitation and sex trafficking are concerns. But that's more of an issue with unethical porn (always watch ethically sourced porn folks!)

On the other hand, since the age of internet porn, sexual irresponsibility, teen sex, rape, and divorce have all declined. (Correlation)

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Shhh! Don't mention the actual numbers! The old days were better, and the kids are rotten! /s

It's not the best argument, but it's the main one that you can't directly undercut at this point. If you say it's exploitative, well, it doesn't have to be, and many people know it. If you admit it's about your religion/culture, well, maybe it's not mine, and I'll even say maybe it's not good, and that's also a position people appreciate.

[โ€“] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago

as a teen my buddy bought a penthouse collection off of two old ladies at a yardsale. Blocking Pornhub will do nothing unless they also block VPN and TOR use

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

Remember your high school friend that had porn mags in their locker?

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

In my fifties, saw porn as a minor. Paper was a thing for the last century, at least!

load more comments (26 replies)
[โ€“] [email protected] 36 points 9 months ago

It's the year 2024 and legislators STILL don't understand that the internet doesn't have borders. They can regulate PH because its a Canadian company, but good luck getting every other porn site on the internet to comply

[โ€“] [email protected] 31 points 9 months ago (10 children)

Any law is only as effective as its level of enforcement. I have a hard time understanding how they think they can regulate access to porn on the Internet. If anything, if legitimate, more mainstream sites get more difficult to access, will our youngsters really stop their Google search there, or will they just click on the next link that just won't have age verification, with potentially much "worse" porn than what they'd have watched initially lol? Did any of the countries that implemented age verification already really see any significant impact?

load more comments (10 replies)
[โ€“] [email protected] 29 points 9 months ago (2 children)

So who will be held accountable when fake ID verification pages start coming up everywhere and identity theft becomes even worse?

[โ€“] [email protected] 19 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

There's already a website selling Al generated fake IDs for digital age/kyc verification.

[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

Is that not free yet? Huh

[โ€“] [email protected] 10 points 9 months ago

It's YOUR FAULT for being an immoral person and trying to access pornography when you should be working and paying taxes. This message brought to you by the federal government of Canada

[โ€“] [email protected] 13 points 9 months ago (1 children)

There is Very Probably No way to get around this kind of thing. You know until GovCan allows Bell and Rogers to filter "hackers" traffic to protect Canadians.

[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

And then you just upgrade your VPN software, and look for sketchier providers. We could switch to an intranet like Cuba, but then our economy might end up like Cuba because it will suck. And I would switch to pirate radio bursts to move content around, so I'm still going to be able to get my scientific papers without buying them. Or porn.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

If there were a standardized large scale mesh network I would be all over that. Like if everyone agreed (before governments get too handsy) on a TCP/IP over HAM setup, a 'free' internet could be built and ready to go when the corporate owned networks go 1984.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

So on a second read, I think you might be talking about a situation where the government still allows an alternate system to operate, at least if it's established. I already wrote this up from the same worst-case perspective as in OP.

For daily driving, the trick with that would be offering something commercial providers can't, other than an abstract long-term argument. Without that, you're basically just trying to start your own ISP, but without any investors. For enthusiast use, see APRS below, which is a thing.


APRS is kind of the relevant current standard. The trick is that being carried by radios that are unpredictable, it has no upper bound on latency (I think). If you want the same browsing experience (TCP especially needs a lot of back and forth) that's really hard, because presumably big brother isn't going to let you have a mesh station online for very long.

The burst thing I was talking about is genuinely how spies do it in locked-down places like Eritrea or Turkmenistan - you go to a busy public place and absolutely hog bandwidth for just one second, using a disguised radio, and then wander out with your groceries before the radio detectors can catch up. I suppose open-source resources for that would be good, if they don't already exist.

I'd love to look at the transport layer of NATO's system. It's designed for both wartime (so arbitrary failure rate, type and pattern) and extensibility, and I'd be fascinated to know how they did it. Unfortunately, it's also a big damn secret, to the point it's the main thing they bring up when the media asks about China getting their hands on a working F-35. I'd also anticipate that it relies on every user registered as friendly acting friendly, at least over the long term.

One of the things that's on my future project list is over-the-air crypto, so you can pay someone to transmit your 50 meg thoughtcrime video slowly but persistently. As far as I know there's no prohibition on digital sigs (like there is on encryption), so it should be doable somehow.

[โ€“] [email protected] 12 points 8 months ago

And theyre calling it ArriveCam

[โ€“] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago

They should talk to YouTube to find out how successful their months long efforts to block at blockers have been. This is an effort by pearl clutchers to do the impossible in a domain that they know absolutely nothing about.

load more comments
view more: next โ€บ