this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2024
597 points (98.2% liked)

Open Source

29175 readers
506 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CodexArcanum 121 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (4 children)

Tembra, his music downloaded. Darmok and Jalad with the AUX cable.

[–] Oddbin 44 points 5 months ago

Shaka-khan, when the beat drops

[–] [email protected] 28 points 5 months ago

Arnock, on the night of his joining.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 94 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Nice project. $249 seems a bit high, but I guess it's like the Fairphone, they can't save as much as the large manufacturers do.

[–] [email protected] 50 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Holy f*** $250? Wow well it is not for me then :(

[–] [email protected] 38 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I'm genuinely curious if someone's published a BoM cost breakdown, I'm wondering if there's a couple of super high tickets items in the like the scroll wheel and custom PCB cost.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago (3 children)

The cost of the scroll wheel cannot possibly be more than 10€ and the pcb cannot be more than 1€ battery is about 4e and display can be 7-8, chip is 2-3e and passives, connectors etc brlow 5. The manufacturing costs of the thing are likely below 40€, even in small volumes. Assy costs are probably about 20% of the total.

Part of the high cost may be investments in moulds for the casing and r&d cost.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 5 months ago (7 children)

It's a project by an Australian team, so one would assume two things:

  1. It's in Australian Dollars.
  2. Australia has experienced severe hyperinflation overnight (or earlier today, for many of us reading this)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago

It’s a neat project. Costs as much as an iPod :P

[–] [email protected] 55 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Hopefully people take the source and release a full walkthrough on doing this with an entirely off-the-shelf design. I've got a full electronics workshop and two 3d printers and would LOVE to assemble my own music player with open source designs.

[–] [email protected] 55 points 5 months ago (4 children)

Brings back fond memories of rockbox on my sansa.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Rockbox was the shit.

Breathed so much life into my iRiver. And I always had to defend the thing: “it's older than iPods! It can't be an rip-off”

[–] JackiesFridge 16 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Rockbox *is...

It's still going.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I use rockbox on a late ipod classic. I find it a very good listening experience, but I am interested in switching to open source *hardware

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago

I'm assuming you mean hardware? Because Rockbox is already FOSS (GPLv2)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Now you too can play Doom on the worst screen imaginable!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

With the worst controls imaginable to boot :)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sharkwellington 7 points 5 months ago

Ayo that was amazing on the Sansa Clip+.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 5 months ago (2 children)

This is insanely priced, particularly when you see that it literally loses on everything but battery life compared to the original iPod 5gb, let alone the Classic.

[–] agent_flounder 16 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Not quite. It has 1TB sd card storage. That's far, far better. And it has wifi and USB not just FireWire. Ram is less sure but how much ram do you need for playing tunes?

[–] Blue_Morpho 9 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Where did you read 1TB? The webpage says it supports up to 2TB but doesn't say it ships with an SD card.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] blackfire 22 points 5 months ago (7 children)

20 hour battery life of use is actually far better than I thought it would be. Wonder what the pi equiv build would bu

[–] j4k3 30 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The Pi in any form is a much larger system with a whole lot more clock cycles, larger architecture, and more peripherals like a full memory management unit, graphics hardware, etc.

On the flip side IIRC most ESP32's are 210MHz and just dual core. It is microcontroller versus microprocessor, so probably 10× less power or more.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 months ago (1 children)

A Raspberry Pi Pico would be sufficient for this. It uses the RP2040, which is comparable to the ESP32, minus the WiFi.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Actually not really. The pi pico has no functional, good low power states currently developed. That is essential for a mobile device. A pi pico would simply drain the battery in sleep mode very quickly.

Tons of MCUs could do the job. Some STMs would also be good for it. The pi pico is more focused at non-mobile applications though at the moment like a very cheap general MCU for things that are USB powered or mains powered.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Has anyone checked out prices for refurbished ipod classics? $300 for a 20 year old mp3 player! Insanity!

Edit: looking at the specs for the Tangara..... 16MB of internal storage???? Uhhhhhhh......... I guess the intent is to use an SD card.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kamenlady 17 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Looks like the first iPod, the brick.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 5 months ago (5 children)

It sounds like that was intentional.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 5 months ago

I haven't seen a device that takes full sized sdhc cards in at least a decade.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 months ago

Listening to music like it's 2005 all over again

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 months ago

They got $136k funding from an original goal of $10k. Did it go to their head?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 months ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago (18 children)

Cute, but what problem does this solve? Regardless of what you feel about any particular platform, consolidating multiple pieces of functionality into the highly integrated smartphone platform was a major step forward in mobility. This just feels like a regression.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Below you will find my highly researched list of advantages over the typical smartphone:

  • Headphone jack
  • Mucho storage space
  • Works without internet connection
  • Free software purity (I don't know, ask RMS)
  • Coolness
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago (4 children)

Genuine question : Why use that instead of storing your musics on your phone ?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago

I prefer an MP3 player over my phone. Here is the one I use. Why I like this one:

  • Dedicated device designed for music.
  • Hardware designed to play high quality music. (Think using Ubuntu vs Ubuntu Studio for music production)
  • Dedicated buttons instead of all touch screen.
  • More options for integration with other devices or systems
  • No distractions. Phones nowadays demand our attention for every little thing. Every app, no matter what it is, has notifications.
  • The Bluetooth is better.
  • You can literally hear the difference in the quality of the music if you use good quality headphones/ear buds. The same song, same file, will not sound the same if it's a good quality FLAC.
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago

Will buy for the Opus audio codec support alone.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago

I will always prefer my iPod Mini with extra storage, new battery and Rockbox like this guy did, and the reasons are:

  • better overall build and audio quality
  • way cheaper (70-80$ vs 249$)
  • better software support (Rockbox is FOSS and has been going on for ages and it's not gonna stop)
  • it actually upcycles old hardware instead of buying new devices and creating more e-waste
  • nostalgia value +100 points
[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago (7 children)

This is all well and good, especially from a nostalgia perspective (in addition to the general pushback against cloud everything); but what I miss most about portable music nowadays is the lack of decent inline remotes (think early 2000s Sony MiniDisc players).

The player stated in your pocket, and the remote handled everything, volume, playback, and even had a dot-matrix screen to identify and navigate playlists!

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Haha 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

The only reason i’d consider this is if the soundcard was premium with DAC and amp included. Otherwise that piece of junk brings nothing to the table. Yes this thing has it, but its nowhere near premium.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Grofit 6 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I just want an mp3 player to replace my Walkman with sensme, they killed sensme and nothing has replaced it so to date the best mp3 player I own is that little thing, I tell it what mood I am in and it always delivers, I dread the day it dies.

I've tried cloud based music services like Spotify etc they are not really same thing as it's just global playlists for a mood/genre, not something tailored to your tastes in a set catalogue.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›