this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2024
368 points (98.9% liked)

News

23639 readers
3316 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Authorities in New Mexico will not seek charges against three police officers involved in a fatal shooting after arriving at the wrong house last year.

Officers in the town of Farmington fired dozens of shots and killed Robert Dotson, 52, because he appeared at the door of his home holding a gun.

At the time, the officers were responding to a domestic violence call from a house across the street.

The Dotson family filed a lawsuit against the department last year.

According to a complaint filed by the family in court, police arrived at the Dotson residence late on 5 April, 2023 and "parked down the street and did not have their lights on".

When Mr Dotson opened his front door holding a weapon, police immediately opened fire, striking him 12 times. Another 19 shots were fired at his wife Kimberly, who was unharmed during the incident. Police later said she opened fire on officers with a pistol.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 126 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (23 children)

disarm the police. they do not need to be armed their entire shifts. if they approached this house without lethal weapons, how many people would be dead right now?

zero. the answer is zero.

do not let cowards have lethal armament

[–] [email protected] 25 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Police should have access to weapons, but they should be locked in the car and require remote unlock when they actually need them.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Or maybe leave them to trained professionals they can call for support.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 10 months ago

That might work in cities with a reasonable response time.

[–] Kbobabob 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Or maybe just fucking train them. 6 months is supposed to be enough? You need more than that to cut someone's fucking hair.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago

The problem is they attend conferences that brainwash them into thinking that every person they interact with is seconds away from pulling a machine gun out of their pocket and mowing them all down. To make things worse, their word is also treated as gospel by a large portion of the population so generic terms like "I feared for my safety" (along with qualified immunity) is all they need to avoid any sort of accountability.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (22 replies)
[–] [email protected] 116 points 10 months ago (13 children)

If the police are allowed to kill you simply for possessing a gun, you do not have a right to bare arms. They have violated your civil rights.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 10 months ago (2 children)

bare arms

Those aren’t the type of guns we’re talking about…

[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago

Hah, I'll leave it.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] EdibleFriend 70 points 10 months ago (26 children)

They took 19 shots at the wife and didn't hit her? Not only are these people disgusting but they can't even do this part of the job fucking right.

[–] dual_sport_dork 36 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I can do you better. There was a high profile police, er, "shooting" in my town back in the early 2000's that made front page in the papers because four cops fired 204 shots at some guys -- for those keeping score at home, that's four Barney Fifes with three complete magazines, two reloads each out of their issued Glock 17's -- and hit no one.

So they succeeded in doing nothing but putting holes in a bunch of people's cars, a couple of rowhouses, lampposts, mailboxes, etc., and failed to even so much as wing any of the multiple alleged perps. I mean, they didn't manage to nail any innocent bystanders or people sleeping in their beds or anything for once, either. Ludicrous levels of wanton and irresponsible property damage and potential injury or death dealt to anyone within a radius of who knows how many blocks, not a single care given, for no benefit whatsoever. You know, just business as usual.

To this day I wonder if there actually were any perps, or if some cops just decided they wanted to shoot up a poor inner city neighborhood for yuks and get away with it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago

Something similar happened in NYC except the cops hit a ton of bystanders and then charged the suspect for it as if he'd done it himself.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago (3 children)

We have stormtroopers, but at least stormtroopers look cool or something?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (24 replies)
[–] _number8_ 70 points 10 months ago (2 children)

pizza delivery guys fuck this up far less and show a higher degree of care and professionalism, while not having guns and power to hide behind

[–] [email protected] 30 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's fucked up the pizza delivery people are more professional than cops but here we are. It's sadly a more dangerous job than being a police officer, too. At least, on average.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Police are so inept that they had to create special protections to shield them from being held accountable for their actions legally.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Fredselfish 16 points 10 months ago

They apparently were supposed to be responding the domestic dispute but not only did they shoot him 12 fucking times they fired 19 bullets at the supposed victim?

Why the fuck are they not being charged again?

They just straight up murder people now with consequences. And like other's have said if they can shoot you for having a gun then we have no right to bare arms and they violent the second amendment.

[–] ultranaut 24 points 10 months ago (3 children)

I've been woken up in the middle of the night by angry police who showed up at the wrong house and it's fucking terrifying, but it's a really bad idea to ever answer your door with a gun in your hand. If you feel like you need a gun to open your door you shouldn't be opening the door.

[–] partial_accumen 39 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Not opening the door wouldn't save you. There was a no-knock warrant where a man was woken up when the police had kicked in his door and shined a light in his face. He had a gun next to his bed (I can't remember if he was even holding it). He had been awake something like less than 8 seconds before the cops shot him because they saw the gun.

[–] Dud 6 points 10 months ago

Ah I think I saw the body cam footage on that one, quite sobering to see.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Wrench 20 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

In my experience, cops don't always identify themselves during the knock. They just slam on your door extremely aggressively, and may respond that they're cops if you yell through the door. Nor is there reason to believe them even if they do identify themselves verbally.

I hate guns, and don't own one. But I would not blame someone for bringing a gun with them after one of those knocks in the middle of the night. Who knows who it could be.

[–] ultranaut 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

For sure, when they knocked on my door at 4am I was sound asleep and had no idea what was going on. I don't think they ever identified themselves as police, they just kept pounding aggressively on the door. My first instinct was full fight mode, it was a very confusing and terrifying way to wake up. I can definitely see arming yourself in that situation until you figured out who the fuck is pounding on the door in the middle of the night. It's the opening the door while armed part specifically that's a bad idea, that's inherently going to escalate any situation and you don't know who is at your door or whether they are actually a threat so it's not appropriate to be brandishing a gun. Either don't open the door until you know who it is or keep the gun out of sight until you know it's actually needed.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dual_sport_dork 8 points 10 months ago

I won't open the door anyway. The cops have no legitimate reason to be banging on my door, ever, so they can go pack sand. The only two possible reasons for doing so are a wrong address or deliberate fuckery on their part. So I'd rather let them come to me. Preferably to the 3rd story bedroom, the one up the rickety narrow stairs. (Yay for 1920's redneck architecture. For once.)

Despite all the yelling and threats and bluster they'll inevitably do, if they ain't got a warrant you are not obligated to let them in or even acknowledge their presence. Fuck 'em.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 10 months ago

Republicans told me it was Legal to have a Gun in your house and also that we need to Defund Schools to give money to Cops?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Cops in the States do cops in the states things. I'm so tired.

[–] homesweethomeMrL 7 points 10 months ago (7 children)

Yeah but, yeah but see, see though the thing is though, but see he was white this time. So. Y'know. Might make the news. Oh, wait it did.

Member that time they found all those unmarked graves of people reported missing behind the Jackson Mississippi police station? Member that? Got less coverage than the Star Wars Holiday Special.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›