God damn it, when am I going to get a taxpayer-funded man's ass to fuck already?
this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2024
784 points (98.5% liked)
Microblog Memes
6655 readers
2879 users here now
A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.
Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.
Rules:
- Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
- Be nice.
- No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
- Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.
Related communities:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Take it up with your local municipal board members at the next meeting
DO YOU THINK I HAVEN'T DONE THAT ALREADY?!
And we said we would get back to you, but you need to fill out forms 32, 78a, 78b, 12, 19a, 19c and 69.
The deadline for Form 69 was January 1st, they are going to have to fill out a supplemental 420 and get it signed by the state secretary.
Yes, you are completely correct. I had forgotten about that.
I believe they just have to get permit A38
That was before the equality act of 2022.
Thursday is your night in the barrel
I get this reference
Considering he's such an old fogey, Biden did a remarkable amount to advance LGBTQ rights since he's been in office.
That's what happens when someone is able to admit they're not an expert at everything and they surround themselves with people who are.
It's really cool to see. I did not have high hopes for Biden for a lot of his older policy decisions I didn't agree with, but I'm extremely impressed with what he's managed to do for civil rights and social awareness in his first term.
I'm not doubting just could you maybe elaborate?
Here's a couple pretty good lists of all the executive orders and legislation Biden has passed during his first term that has explicitly strengthened anti-discrimination laws against LGBTQ, provided funding, initiated lawsuits against anti-LGBTQ laws and initiatives, reversed the ban on transgender military, and other stuff:
https://www.hrc.org/resources/president-bidens-pro-lgbtq-timeline
The risk in that is that those "experts" might have their own interests. For compamies usually
And the alternative is having people who don't know shit about fuck making decisions potentially based on their own interests.
What's better?
Independent experts that at least somehow try to be neutral. And politicians who have to reason their decisions.
A couple off the top of my head:
- Chemical Safety Board (check out their YouTube channel)
- National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
- National Fire Protection Association
All are subject matter experts that contribute to laws and policy decisions to varying degrees.
Edit: National Institute of Health, CDC,
So exactly what I said from the get go.
List? :)
Here's a couple pretty good lists of all the executive orders and legislation Biden has passed during his first term that has explicitly strengthened anti-discrimination laws against LGBTQ, provided funding, initiated lawsuits against anti-LGBTQ laws and initiatives, reversed the ban on transgender military, and other stuff:
https://www.hrc.org/resources/president-bidens-pro-lgbtq-timeline
Oh Kamala Harris marched at a pride recent in 2021, I didn't know that.
Let's face it, state-mandated & enforced heterosexuality and cisgenderness hasn't stopped people from being gay and/or trans, so I'm pretty sure state mandated homosexuality will be purely symbolic.
i mean the romans were reasonably successful, granted that was mostly just for rich politicians which isn't much different from the modern republican party except without the denial
Isn't that a complete myth? As far as I know there has never been a society more gay than today's. Rome was not accepting of gays.
afaik the deal with rome is that it was really specifically that powerful men were expected to have twinks to "mentor", sexually dominating another man showed that you were powerful, and being dominated did much the opposite. Being a lesbian seems to have just been strange to them although i don't recall hearing of it being illegal or anything.
in general a lot of our ideas of identity and sexuality are quite modern and in the past it depended WAY more on where specifically you were and what social class you belonged to. Like why would anyone give a shit what some rural people do in their bedroom? the only ones who are likely to give even the slightest shit about that are their fellow villagers and they're probably gonna actually care about them being happy.
As far as I'm aware there were only a few instances mentioned of older men having sexual relationships with young boys and they were looked on with disgust from the population and even other elites.
As for villagers being gay I think they were treated really badly because religion and having children was really important back then.
I unironically want to see this just as much as I want to see all women running government and on the supreme court. Just for like one presidential cycle.
Do I at least get to choose top or bottom?
I am position-fluid.
!Whatever position I am in, there will always be fluids.!<
Gross yet hot
What’s the motive for turning everybody gay though?
gay agenda
I haven’t kept up with the new releases, the last agenda newsletter just had this
Symmetrical with the frogs.
No children
no child slaves, truly the republican nightmare scenario
I hope that our few remaining friends
give up on trying to save us
I hope we come up with a failsafe plot
to piss off the dumb few who forgave us
I hope the fences we mended
fall down beneath their own weight
and I hope we hang on past the last exit
I hope it’s already too late
State enforcement of sexuality, that would be one of the two parties platforms, if they cared to have a platform to run on any more, if they made a platform now it would just be saying the quiet part out loud.