this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2024
269 points (97.9% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6659 readers
500 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
all 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Beefytootz 72 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I remember hearing that the allies had a similar plan. They air dropped a ton of extra large condoms, but labeled them small/medium so the Nazis would think their enemies are packing the meatiest of girthmeisters to ever exist

[–] [email protected] 25 points 10 months ago (2 children)

You say plan like the concept was hashed out while sober

[–] RealFknNito 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)

"Yeah we can't shoot them from this spot, how about we hurt their feelings instead?"

[–] Iron_Lynx 6 points 10 months ago

Emotional damage!

[–] AngryCommieKender 9 points 10 months ago

You clearly haven't heard of Project Pluto.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Pluto

I guarantee they were chugging coffee, but I seriously doubt that there was much other mind altering substance usage at those labs.

[–] NoSpiritAnimal 11 points 10 months ago

Girthmeister is a god tier username

[–] [email protected] 54 points 10 months ago (1 children)

the word there is 'morale'.

moral is like telling a story to teach right or wrong.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago

Yeah, but somehow I think this would only improve morale.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 10 months ago

After the porn bombardment didn't work, the axis powers considered a German porn bombardment, which was quickly rejected as even Hitler thought it was too cruel

[–] GrammatonCleric 17 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I need to know the historical context here

[–] [email protected] 29 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You know, this really makes me appreciate how far drawn pornography has advanced in such a relatively short amount of time. folks just could not draw titties a hundred years ago.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

These are good tiddies.

She has some owl in her though. No human neck would turn that far.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I regret to inform you that these are not, in fact, doing it for me. They look like balloons fixed onto to a weirdly flat blow up doll, complete with the weird uncanny face they always have. To think this was what was considered military grade at the time... War really is hell.

[–] GreatCornolio 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Just cause you low-key need weiners in there doesn't mean that's not perfectly fine disney-esque goon material

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I will die on this hill. Pluck the average twitter furry artist off the street and I'd bet they can crank out better softcore on a receipt than the militaries best and brightest of a century ago.

[–] GreatCornolio 2 points 10 months ago

A receipt, I will concede. But a bar napkin? No chance

[–] NOT_RICK 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Whoever designed that site and chose those colors needs to find a new path in life. Graphic design and front end development are not for them.

[–] stankmut 27 points 10 months ago (2 children)

This is what all websites used to look like back in the day. Only thing missing is a blinking 'Site in Construction' sign.

[–] AtmaJnana 6 points 10 months ago

It looks just like some of the webpages I made in the 90s.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago

this isn't too bad, better than a lot of modern sites