this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2024
916 points (95.9% liked)

Political Memes

5497 readers
2357 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zehzin 100 points 10 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 100 points 10 months ago (5 children)

If they hand you a gun and tell you to march off to die in a foreign land, turn the gun around on your killer.

[–] takeda 87 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (5 children)

LOL, the support of Ukraine is happening exactly so we don't get WW3 and won't have to send our soldiers to fight.

Anyone who thinks Ukraine is Russia's ultimate goal is extremely naive.

It wasn't Crimea, it wasn't Georgia, it wasn't Chechnya. It won't stop until

Here's a quick summary of what it is about: https://youtu.be/M6tsp4mFix8

This is a book published in 1997 which Putin was following and largely until full invasion of Ukraine everything was going smoothly: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foundations_of_Geopolitics

[–] [email protected] 16 points 10 months ago (23 children)

Ffs. Russia is not going to fight NATO. Why'd they attack Georgia in 2008? Answer: To prevent them from joining NATO. Why'd they attack Ukraine? Answer: to prevent them from joining NATO. Russia is not dumb enough to fight anything that can throw nukes, that's why they're preventing the NATO umbrella from covering (what they consider to be) their sphere of influence.

[–] takeda 16 points 10 months ago (2 children)

They didn't plan to join NATO. Ukraine had a single digit percentage interest in NATO before crimea.

Russia doesn't want Eastern European countries in NATO, because it makes it much harder to take them over.

NATO is a defensive alliance, and is no danger to Russia except for their imperialist goals. Best example of it is after Finland joined NATO Russia removed their troops from that border. That's right Russia now has less troops there than they had when they were imaging Ukraine.

And one last thing: even if it was true, since when Russia can decide for sovereign nation who they form alliances with? The excuse to invade looks exactly as the same bullshit Nazi Germany invented with Poland (both claiming to save German minorities and also that was actually planning to invade Germany). They are not even original.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Their plan isn’t to fight NATO directly. It’s to instigate domestic political support in foreign countries against entities like NATO and the EU, and push nationalism and isolationism and defeatism into enough people’s heads so that the bigger countries think it isn’t worth fighting Russia to defend another smaller country that is not their own. It’s about killing the idea of article 5 and thus NATO’s reason to exist, so that Russia can confront each country on a bilateral basis where they have the military advantage if no one is coming to their defense.

This probably wont happen with an assault on a major urban area, but little chunks of unpopulated Finland or Norway. How willing would the American public be to send pilots to die for Lapland? If the major powers blink and don’t feel like committing, Russia continues to escalate, like they’ve been doing for the past 15 years

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (20 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 68 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Why don't Presidents fight the war? Why do they always send the poor?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 57 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Of course not. Millennials are too old and unless things kick off in the next couple years, gen z will be too.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 10 months ago (2 children)

What are we calling the generation below them? I’m really losing track nowadays.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 10 months ago

Gen Alpha, they don’t have a nickname yet.

[–] skydivekingair 23 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Gen A. They’re around middle school and younger now.

[–] [email protected] 73 points 10 months ago (3 children)

A whole generation of Forest Gump's girlfriend?

[–] Pohl 15 points 10 months ago

Hey. This is a great joke. Thanks.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TankovayaDiviziya 41 points 10 months ago (11 children)

Before World War I and World War II, many thought things would not escalate until we realised it was far too late. The British intelligence thought the assassination of Franz Ferdinand would only be contained regionally instead of escalating to a world war.

Most wars are class wars and most issues are class issues. But most people are not class conscious. The base tribalism is instead drummed up to distract us from the real root cause. We're seeing the rise of the far right in many countries such as in Europe, US and India. Most of the rise of the right is due to influx of migrants, who are displaced by neocolonial foreign policies of corporate backed governments and capitalism-induced global warming.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 40 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Millennials volunteered for Iraq.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 37 points 10 months ago (21 children)

This sentiment of 'I'm not going to fight' is funny until the war actually starts. And then it's either you fight early, or you fight late. Sometimes too late.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 10 months ago (6 children)

Nah. I'd legitimately rather kill myself than fight for my government.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (20 replies)
[–] [email protected] 35 points 10 months ago (74 children)

I mean it definitely depends on the circumstances. If Russia attacks here then I'm absolutely fighting.

load more comments (74 replies)
[–] blady_blah 35 points 10 months ago (22 children)

You'd be amazed what some good old fashion propaganda will do for you.

The US was so gung-ho after 9-11 they accidentally attacked the wrong country. I know they didn't have any problem getting troops or buy-in from the people of all ages. It was pretty disgusting how quickly your average citizen bought into the bull-shit the Bush administration was selling when it was obviously a lie.

load more comments (22 replies)
[–] Stanwich 33 points 10 months ago

As long as they are recruiting the dumbest and poorest from your failing high-schools you'll always have enough for your wars.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I'll defend my country, but I'm not going to engage in an armed conflict overseas.

IMO, as long as it's not directly threatening me and my life, then I will simply see another WW as old people who are angry at other old people, sending me off to die for their grudge.

No thanks chief. Stick me in prison if you're so inclined but I'm not about to kill some poor kid I've never met and I don't have anything against, just because you can't use your words.

✌️

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 10 months ago (14 children)

Millennial here. Can confirm, I'll be staying home and doing my own thing. One live isn't worth more then another and I'm not going to war. If you're going to put me in jail because I refuse, then maybe I need to find a different country to live in.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 10 months ago

On the very off chance they restarted the draft, there are tons of reasons the Pentagon would fight conscription, make sure you know asylum procedures or have the stuff ready to immigrate. Run don't try to just ignore the draft.

They, the last time they did the draft, didn't just throw normies into jail, they grabbed them then kicked them over to the military and then if you ran away and got brought back after being AWOL they just deployed you and let happen what happened, regulars frequently discovered that these sorts had... uhh... "accidents" at a more frequent rate.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 10 months ago (6 children)

The first gun they'll give me I'll aim at myself and be done with it.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 10 months ago (4 children)

You can aim it at your commanding officer first!

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 10 months ago (6 children)

My kid doesn't particularly want to fight, but she's ok with guns and convinced anarchy will be good for the environment?! Idk, she's not dumb, but these kids have less stake in the institutions than MAGA retirees..

[–] [email protected] 27 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Does she mean "anarchy" or Anarchism, a stateless classless society based on voluntary associations?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 10 months ago

The fact they will never have the chance to enter the ownership class keeps manifesting in new and interesting ways in the media, at their jobs, in their schools, amongst their social circles. The decline in availability of material wealth destabilizes all.

Yall ever seen Daybreakers? It's kinda corny but it feels more relevant every day.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Harbinger01173430 17 points 10 months ago (10 children)

So...they are going to send gen x and gen alpha?

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Elementalbeast 16 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Between propaganda and indecision, a whole generation will learn of conscription.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] RupeThereItIs 15 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Uhm, doofus, nobody's gonna fight in ww3.

Bombs get launched and we ALL die, that's how ww3 is faught.

It's frightening how little the younger generations understand about nuclear war.

[–] [email protected] 61 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (14 children)

There have been plenty of wars fought in the age of nuclear weapons that, strangely enough, have not resulted in the use of nuclear weapons. There's a few of them going on right now, in fact!

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] RealFknNito 18 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Me looking at the handful of declassified missile defense sites and wondering what shit we have that isn't known.

Yeah.. it'll just be that simple Mr. Armchair General.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›