this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2024
341 points (97.0% liked)

World News

38974 readers
2002 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Burn_The_Right 58 points 9 months ago (6 children)

I wish we had a Zelensky here in the U.S. to help us combat conservatism.

[–] Alteon 69 points 9 months ago (3 children)

That would be John Stuart, if he ever decided to run for office. And holy fuck, he'd kill it. I mean, he says he doesn't want to do it, but he knows more about policy, politics, and how the game is played than most politicians.

I get it, I wouldn't want to either, but daaaaamn. He'd rip conservative a politics about 5 new assholes.

[–] Cinner 32 points 9 months ago

you know what they say, it's exactly the type of people that don't want to that should.

[–] Burn_The_Right 22 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, Stewart is the hero we need but don't deserve.

[–] Agent641 2 points 9 months ago

The dank knight

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

I think at this point it'd be Colbert since he's still got his show

Plus, having a president who can wipe the floor with everyone else in Tolkien literary discourse would be the biggest foreign policy flex since bretton woods

[–] [email protected] 49 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (5 children)

What’s happening in the US isn’s even considered conservatism anymore. It’s the MAGA cult. I am definitely left, but conservatives don’t always need to be bad. It just so happens that the Republican Party has filled itself with people serving themselves and not the people who voted for them. Fingers crossed things go well this November.

[–] Burn_The_Right 52 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (19 children)

Fascism is the natural result of unchecked conservatism. We are watching that natural progression play out now.

We've let conservatism go unchecked for so long that I think it will take physical action to stop the fascist infection at this point.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I think you're conflating conservatism with capitalism. We have a corporatocracy that always takes precedent over the average voter. Worse on the right but enabled on the left. Ironically, as unpopular as Biden is, he is the most progressive president we've had in 50 years (and yes, before you downvote I acknowledge he is not even close to "being" progressive).

[–] Burn_The_Right 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

I won't downvote you at all. You make good points.

However, I am not conflating conservatism with capitalism. The reason capitalism remains unchecked is because of conservatism (including neoliberalism). Conservatism is the tool of capitalism to remain unchecked.

If we were to eliminate or marginalize conservatism (including neoliberalism), capitalism could be well-regulated by the representatives of the normal people rather than the representatives of the corporations.

When I shit on conservatives, I'm shitting on so much more than their corporate knob-gobbling. I am also shitting on their racism, misogyny, homophobia, transphobia, xenophobia, antisemitism and other conservative traits. Conservatism is just fascism that has not yet matured to its final form.

As for Biden, I much prefer this old neoliberal to any GOP conservative, and I despise neoliberalism. He gets a pass this time around. I admit he did way better than I expected his first term. And obviously the alternative next election is pure fascism, sooo... BIDEN 2024!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

Finally, someone I 100% agree with!

I think I was confused by your use of the term conservatism. 99% of people will associate that completely with the right, when the reality is that there are plenty on the left also feeding conservatism which in turns promotes corporatism.

Keep fighting the good fight!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Fascism is capitalism in decay. Modern conservatism is still an offshoot of liberalism (as compared to old conservatives who were attempting to conserve monarchy). Liberalism is a capitalist ideology defined by promotion of individual rights, civil liberties, and most importantly free enterprise and markets. Fascism is capitalism in decay because those in power will use that power to maintain their rule, through whatever means necessary. For Trump, that was Jan 6th, which is a new low for US politics, but he’s not alone in manipulating the levers of power, and neither side seems keen on removing powers from themselves when they get in power.

[–] Burn_The_Right 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Good comment.

I'd like to add an important point about your use of the word "liberal" for those who may not know... The word "liberal" in this context refers to economic liberalism.

The word "liberal" in this use is absolutely not interchangeable with the word "progressive". These two words mean very different things. Conservatives have worked hard to cause these words to be confused with one another.

In 1980, Reagan's conservatives re-defined the word "liberal" in conservative media to be a pejorative for "progressive". This was an attempt to confuse public discussion. Before this, the word "liberal" was used to describe economic policy. Now, conservatives (and many progressives who don't know any better) use the word "liberal" interchangeably with "progressive".

Re-defining words is a common tactic used by conservatives (and fascists) to influence and confuse public perceptions.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 9 months ago (6 children)

When was the last time there was a conservative president in the US who didn't cause tremendous lasting damage to the country?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

Eisenhower(?) at the very least id say any damage he may have done was at least somewhat offset by good done. But he was still very much part of the new deal era so he is moreso the exception, besides him im pulling blanks both before and after.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago

Yeah I know what you mean. I want to have debates over subjects that are actually debatable. Big government vs. small government kind of discussions.

Instead I feel like we're just struggling to constantly explain why burning down the Capitol and declaring Trump to be God Emperor is a bad idea.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

I agree. They were always the worse option in my lifetime when looking in the generic but individually some were and option and was a good hedge against radical left things to help keep things centered. Again that being said the us has always been to right to me.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Conservatives are always bad.

The past was not great for many peoples, today is still not great for many peoples, there is nothing to be gained from going back or staying still.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

We’re having the same issue in Canada. Conservatives are wanting to go back and not look forward. It wasn’t always that way.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 9 months ago

Thanks for making another thread not about US only about US politics.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)
[–] Burn_The_Right 3 points 9 months ago

You nailed it! He is exactly who I was thinking of.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] Burn_The_Right 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

An embattled, beleaguered John Oliver in fatigues is a hilarious mental image, though I'd probably trust his command

[–] TAG 52 points 9 months ago (2 children)

As someone born in the Russia, I support Zelensky looking at the old borders of the Kievan Rus.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 9 months ago (1 children)

From White to Black sea, Ukraine will be free

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

As someone who’s homeland is also being forcefully taken from underneath us, I love that that.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The problem is determining what from that period constitutes "Ukrainian" or "Russian". The old "Rus peoples" were a lot of relatively different yet also similar groups, that homogenize and heterogenize across time depending on different political and social conditions, which at a certain point in time during the modern age some intellectuals try to categorize and end up reaching some sort of consensus with "Russian", "Byelorussian" and "Ukrainian".

In the end, forgetting this kind of nuance invites people who are a little shaky on the head to come up with pan-nationalist narratives that justify some sort of anachronistic imperialism. It's already bad enough that Putin's Z-morons are trying to appropriate Ukrainian identity as a breakaway of their own to justify ethnic cleansing, let's not have some Ukrainians that try and do the same but in reverse.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

It's way easier when you have a look at Muscovy, which is the core of the so-called Russian empire. Also, how Muscovy made a huge rebranding effort to be called Russia, at the expense of Kiev.

The Russian imperialist narrative needs Kiev to be part of it precisely because that's the origin of the very identity it stole. Without it there's no grand history, no Orthodox legitimacy, just the history of being a Mongolian vassal.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

how Muscovy made a huge rebranding effort to be called Russia

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] teft 42 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

What's the phrase again? Oh yes, turnabout is fair play. We need to clone Zelensky.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 9 months ago (1 children)

This is about combatting against Kremlin's expansionist propaganda, so I see it as an active effort to promote their own cultural and historical legacy.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 9 months ago

Exactly and frankly it's only right to point out this cultural heritage even if obviously Ukraine doesn't want to conquer these territories. Especially since Russia actively tries to rewrite cultural history about it. And that's by no means limited to people with Ukrainian roots in Russia but they actively rewrite Russian history to discredit dozens of cultural minorities. Very similar to China's ongoing "project" to make China as "Han Chinese" as possible.

load more comments
view more: next ›