Former investment banker and businessman. Really says it all about the structure of the current government. Why would you put someone who can’t even grasp the very basics of our solar system in charge of this?
this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2024
85 points (97.8% liked)
UK Politics
2890 readers
264 users here now
General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both [email protected] and [email protected] .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.
Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.
Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.
If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)
Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.
Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.
[email protected] appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I love how he says he's learning on the job and isn't an encyclopedia because it obviously requires a phd level education to know the difference between a planet and a fucking star.
"We now have plans to colonize the sun!"
Crowd begins murmuring
"How do you expect to land on the sun?"
"Simple. We'll go at night!"
Have you been listening to The Goons again? 😀
Worse still:
Andrew Griffith, who has been in charge of the space sector since November, also mistook Jupiter for Saturn.
You know, Saturn, famous for its massive rings.
To be fair that's an easier mistake to make than confusing Mars and the frickin Sun
The Sun doesn't have rings!
Sheesh.
Haha ok touche
In fairness it seems like it was displayed without rings, but if you're into space then you should be able to see the difference as saturn is far more featureless (at least from the pictures we have), but if the projection on the sphere is lower resolution and the red spot is on the other side I could see them being confused I guess
Equally though you could not make a fool of yourself but pointing out things which should be fairly obvious as the minor popularity gains of "knows common knowledge facts about topics they should be an expert in" are far outweighed by any chance of "looks like a buffoon for not even knowing common knowledge facts about things they should be an expert in"
Jupiter has a MOOOOLE
I’m guessing education is important to him and he always votes to fund it extensively.
For those that want to see... https://www.theyworkforyou.com/mp/25927/andrew_griffith/arundel_and_south_downs/divisions?policy=1074
He doesn't seem to have voted on enough items for they work for you to form an opinion.
It's not clear whether he just hasn't voted or there haven't been any votes and I haven't done enough research to say anything on that topic myself
average conservative. spouting about stuff they are clueless about
One's a chocolate bar, the other's a newspaper?? What a moron!
Well they're both roughly the same colour. I can see his confusion.
One is big, and red, and hot.
The other is small, and red, and cold
What a small, inactive, rocky body orbiting the sun, this man is.
Easy mistake to make 😂
Didn't realize we had a space minister
This is the best summary I could come up with:
On a walk around the Science Museum in London, Mr Griffith pointed to an exhibit showing the surfaces of different planets, the House magazine reported.
A year on from the failure of Britain’s first rocket launch, Mr Griffith insisted that the UK “is a great spacefaring nation”.
The former investment banker and businessman said that in order for humans to colonise Mars, “you’re going to need a lot of the British research and innovation that we’re funding right now”.
Peregrine Mission One, which was the first American attempt to land on the Moon in 50 years, was carrying an instrument built by UK scientists before its journey was brought to an end by a run of technical problems.
The device was supposed to analyse the thin lunar atmosphere as well as find out more about how water might be moving around the moon.
“I think having things like a space strategy, which the UK didn’t have until recently, gives people a long-term roadmap so they understand what we’re doing as a government.”
The original article contains 456 words, the summary contains 172 words. Saved 62%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
This bot should potentially find paragraphs that include words from the headline. It seems to have missed anything about the mistake that the headline is referring to.