this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2024
-12 points (37.5% liked)

Ask Lemmy

25226 readers
1839 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected]. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Like what if I'm in space?

top 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago

Keanu Reeves woah

[–] HootinNHollerin 10 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

spun af atm

gluons be trying to keep me at home when I really wanna go out and smash

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] HootinNHollerin 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Subatomic particle physics I’d rather not ruin the joke by explaining it yet

[–] Mango 1 points 5 months ago

I'll have two of what this guy has.

[–] LemmyKnowsBest 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Careful. At best, you're gonna get some armchair physicist poseurs responding to your question.

[–] Mango 1 points 5 months ago
[–] FrickAndMortar 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The enemy gate is down, Ender!

[–] Mango 2 points 5 months ago

Oohh this makes an excellent point!

[–] konalt 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Nothing much, how about you?

[–] Mango 1 points 5 months ago
[–] A_A 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The up quark or u quark (symbol: u) is the lightest of all quarks, a type of elementary particle, and a significant constituent of matter. It, along with the down quark, forms the neutrons (one up quark, two down quarks) and protons ...
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Up_quark

[–] Mango 2 points 5 months ago

Nice! I didn't expect an answer I haven't even come close to pondering yet!

[–] ItsYourBoyHalo 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I don't understand why people are downvoting this, but up, down, left, right all depend on your frame of reference.

Up in space is nowhere, but at the same time it is everywhere. Those are not physical concepts and they require necessarily a frame of reference to even make sense.

[–] Mango 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Ok. Frame of reference is half way between here and Andromeda!

[–] ItsYourBoyHalo 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

That doesn't really tell me anything, haha

[–] Mango 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] ItsYourBoyHalo 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Dude, North, South, East and West are not real either. Again, you need a frame of reference. Those are 100% arbitrary.

[–] Mango 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I can't tell if you're taking me seriously or not. 🤣

[–] ItsYourBoyHalo 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I am. "Halfway" is not a frame of reference. You need to arbitrarily define what up and down is. North and South is.

[–] Mango 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Why would it be arbitrary there? It's not arbitrary here.

[–] ItsYourBoyHalo 1 points 5 months ago

I highly encourage you to Google this question. You don't seem to understand what a frame of reference is. At least not in this context.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago
[–] Ghostie21 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Up is what you define as up in your coordinates.

[–] Mango 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] Ghostie21 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

No, up is what you define as up.

[–] Mango 0 points 5 months ago

I define up as yo momma.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Opposition of aggregate primary gravity.

[–] Mango 1 points 5 months ago

Ok, but what if I'm between galaxies?

[–] givesomefucks 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Down = where gravity is coming from, the most mass

Up = the opposite direction

[–] Mango 0 points 5 months ago

What if I'm in a Lagrange point?

[–] HootinNHollerin 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] Mango 2 points 5 months ago

Ah yeah I didn't think they'd find this as amusing as others would.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] Mango 1 points 5 months ago

But that also has down.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

The same direction it usually is relative to your perspective, assuming you're aligned to the galactic plane.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

Hi there! Looks like you linked to a Lemmy community using a URL instead of its name, which doesn't work well for people on different instances. Try fixing it like this: [email protected]

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

May i present to you the cosmological principle

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmological_principle

the cosmological principle is the notion that the spatial distribution of matter in the universe is uniformly isotropic when viewed on a large enough scale

So in some sense, everywhere is up

[–] Mango 1 points 5 months ago

I was thinking up is the direction of the expansion of the universe. Not sure if this supports that or not. Or maybe since we're drawn that way, it's the opposite?

[–] rivermonster 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You need more context/specificity around your question. Right now, the question is like saying, "What is that thing...?"

[–] Mango 2 points 5 months ago

But what is it?