this post was submitted on 04 Jan 2024
349 points (88.4% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

35603 readers
1369 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

i've never been on this site before -- that is to say, you don't even get like a couple free words

what a joke

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lemmy_outta_here 108 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Hi! With the OED, it has been like that at least since I started university in 2007. However, lots of public libraries have subscriptions. I just go to my library website, login, and follow the link to the OED. There are many other reference tools that are also included in my library card. Libraries rule!

Edit: you can check merriam-webster for free, I think

[–] [email protected] 29 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Instructions crystal clear, researching etymology of 500-year-old words 😍

Thanks San Francisco Public Library!

[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago

2005 Yes I'm getting a crystal clear picture on this new video phone

Press X to doubt.

[–] TheGrandNagus 82 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

You can still buy the book or access the site via most libraries.

I get that it's a bit annoying, but I'm guessing you'd also be annoyed about an ad-ridden, data-harvesting dictionary.

The Oxford English Dictionary is without a doubt the most well-researched, comprehensive, and linguistically complete English dictionary on Earth, bar none. Nothing even comes close to its depth and scope.

It perhaps is the most well-researched and comprehensive dictionary of all languages, but I wouldn't know.

It's laid out in an unusual way and even has words and alternate meanings that haven't been used for centuries. It's not meant to be a general-purpose dictionary, it's niche and predominantly for linguistic experts or people fascinated by language.

An unbelievable amount of research goes into it, and those people deserve to be paid.

There are dozens of freely-available general-purpose dictionaries out there if you want them.

[–] NevermindNoMind 37 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I was annoyed, like the OP, then I read your comment and now I'm impressed and have an urge to buy a copy of OED I most certainly will never open. They owe you a commission on my sale.

[–] stoly 15 points 10 months ago

A copy will literally fill a shelf. It comes in volumes with addenda releases periodically.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

I don't think you can buy the book. It was 20 volumes in 1989, and they've been working on an ongoing update since then. There's no plans to physically print a third edition.

But yeah, it's a serious scholarly resource, and they do put out free small dictionaries as well.

https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/

[–] TheGrandNagus 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

You are right, it's wayyy too large to fit in one book, I misspoke when I said book

I had no idea they don't want to make physical copies anymore, though, part of me is sad about that, although I can certainly appreciate why they'd go in that direction.

[–] saltesc 42 points 11 months ago (2 children)

The OED has never been free. Go buy a copy and you'll know why.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

In spite of the undeniable truth that the Oxford English Dictionary is a magnificent and exhaustive source of information on the etymology and meaning of the English language, it is my personal inclination to favor their compendium of synonyms and antonyms, which I prefer to other possibilities for their rich collection of words with similar or opposite meanings.

[–] saltesc 4 points 10 months ago

I use Power Thesaurus lol

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I bought a copy and I'm still wondering why.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

Then maybe open it and read a bit?

[–] [email protected] 32 points 11 months ago (1 children)

If you're after an online dictionary, I personally like Wiktionary.

[–] grue 17 points 10 months ago

Yep, only copyleft services (of which Wiktionary is one) can be trusted not to be paywalled or otherwise subverted in the long run.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 10 months ago

Here's the word, if you were wondering:

[–] stoly 16 points 10 months ago

Wasn’t it always a subscription? You really would only have easy access in a university library.

[–] Veedem 15 points 11 months ago

It’s an extensively researched and informative book, much more so than other dictionaries. That information gathering process has to be paid for somehow.

[–] cashews_best_nut 13 points 10 months ago

Cambridge dictionary is free.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

'$searchTerm def' on any search engine

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

And use the OED (Online Etymology Dictionary) for any etymological related queries.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

This is why you should instead use Wiktionary and donate your child's entire college fund to the Wikimedia foundation

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Here is an alternative that aggregates from multiple sources: https://www.thefreedictionary.com/

While I do not oppose paying for definitions, there is someone confusing about collectively generated meaning being aggregated and packaged by one company for profit. A publicly maintained dictionary is a much much better alternative. I guarantee it would be more versatile and rigorous than this Oxford stuff.

[–] Hawke 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

one company

It’s a good thing there are lots of other dictionaries than the OED then.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

There are plenty of other dictionaries and some of them are made of something called paper.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] IDriveWhileTired 2 points 10 months ago

That’s the stuff Bill Buttlicker was trying to buy from that rude salesperson.

[–] serpineslair 6 points 11 months ago

I personally use collins english dictionary. It's the best online dictionary I've found (best descriptions).

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

thats not bad actually. joey tribbiani had to pay $50 and he only got the v words

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

I think Cambridge dictionary is free.

[–] Mr_Blott 3 points 10 months ago

I just paid a one off fee for the Chambers app. It's just as comprehensive

[–] Kallioapina 2 points 10 months ago

FYI Running Ublock Origin is enough to grant access to this dictionary, among others. At least seems to work for me without any paywalls (unless its a geoblock? I'm looking at it from the Nordics).

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

One way to get access to ~~OED~~ ODE without paying a cent is by using kindle app. When you highlight an English word, if will open the dict. You can search for any word from there.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

The unabridged OED has never been cheap to buy. I'm honestly surprised it took this long.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

$29.95 a month? ok. The $100 a year is… better I guess.

Surprised Wikipedia hasn’t put something like this is place yet. Maybe their end-year donations push brings in enough to hold it off.

[–] stoly 13 points 10 months ago (7 children)

The OED is like 150 years old with literally thousands of people scouring every possible source of English for any possible permutation of every word ever. It’s a reference for specialists, not public consumption.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

It works OK for me, but I'm in the UK so maybe it's subscription only for foreigners.