this post was submitted on 04 Jan 2024
178 points (98.4% liked)

News

23611 readers
4471 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dotdi 72 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Just in case nobody noticed: Epstein didn’t kill himself.

[–] morphballganon 3 points 11 months ago
[–] _number8_ 54 points 11 months ago (3 children)

so i figure nothing earth shattering in here if we didn't get 20 headlines about it?

[–] peopleproblems 27 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

no. it's either being written up carefully or suppressed. I'm at page 134, and oooo boy it's juicy.

edit 326-343 are completely redacted.

edit 2: I'll have to dig through later. a lot of pages are corrections to testimony. Notably though, is a few sections on Prince Andrew. He was clearly involved and at least present at the time.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 11 months ago

edit 326-343 are completely redacted.

Probably implicates politicians and/or their owner donors. Can't have the peasants know the atrocities of their lords.

[–] Linkerbaan 5 points 11 months ago

What are the most interesting names on there? Feel free to just paste names in your comment so we can read along 1000 pages is a bit too much for me.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

edit 326-343 are completely redacted.

These might be the most interesting pages

[–] fleabomber 10 points 11 months ago

Apparently, the absence of something salacious is proof of something salacious.

[–] Twentytwodividedby7 6 points 11 months ago

It's a 900 page document, give it time. WSJ already released an article

[–] [email protected] 31 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Anyone else have a bit of smoldering rage that everyone knows what went on, and so far no one but Ghislane Maxwell, Epstein himself and one prince have had even an ounce of trouble from it?

Kinda how Trump will die of old age one day still living a 1% lifestyle and having never seen the inside of a prison.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

when you have an extortionate advantage over someone, you're dangerous - it's much the same policy as a nuclear deterrent.

[–] werefreeatlast -2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The trump lawyers, the judge, the jury and everyone at the trials.....uhoo...and then what else did you do? Did you guys steal the money from those people too? Hmm, what about the pee pee tapes? Did you guys really do that for reals? How fun and interesting...funteresting!

Day 300 of the trial....so you touched her private privately? And did she jump? Or just sort of moan a little? Oh tell us more! So you really think she liked it? Ma'am! Hold on, you'll get your chance too, right now it's "the president's turn...so did you go for the boobies first? And how? We didn't bring a dummy, could you show us on her where you touched? It's for the public records ma'am... c'mon, you want a fair trial yes? Well this is pretty fair? How to we know if he really touched our there or not? Anyway, it's done, let's just take our seats...

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago
[–] [email protected] 19 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Lots of tight lips in this document 🤐

[–] [email protected] 19 points 11 months ago (1 children)

If I were a powerful douchebag, would I allow the release of one of the many documents that says that I did stuff... or the one we made earlier specifically to exonerates me that says that we did not?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Are you a powerful douchebag?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 11 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

Oh my… I was not expecting that

[–] ObsidianZed 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Oh man, Your Favorite Martian. Takes me back.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

He has some newer stuff, rebooting that project apparently. I haven't listened to it yet b/c I was going through the older stuff first to remind me of it, which is how I found this one:-P.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

There was some kind of delay in the release, to allow people who didn't want their names to show up to request they get redacted. So expect anyone that's still named to be able to spin the narrative.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

There's a handful of names from sexually abused women that remain redacted, and only 2 names that have additional time to justify why they should stay redacted. Source

The judge said a handful of names should remain blacked out in the documents because they would identify people who were sexually abused.

Two people whose name appears in the records have been given additional time to make arguments to the court as to why their names should stay redacted.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Is that like a version number? Is 1.3.25 coming soon?

[–] CatsGoMOW 11 points 11 months ago

If 365 days is soon, then yes.

[–] extant 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It's yesterday's date with periods instead of forward slashes.

[–] Yoz 4 points 11 months ago
[–] xc2215x 6 points 11 months ago

Glad they are being revealed. Great to see.