this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2024
1045 points (99.8% liked)

196

15665 readers
2831 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] joneskind 93 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I would like to add that the money Bob gets to buy food returns directly into the economy, thus helping to pay Kevin the mall manager AND Floyd the country boy

[–] [email protected] 29 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Shut up about Bob, how does this even remotely help Shell??!

[–] joneskind 12 points 5 months ago

Depends on Bob's car I guess?

I mean, Bob needs food to survive long enough to buy some gasoline. Bob won't buy Shell's gasoline if he dies.

[–] [email protected] 68 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It seems Bob needs better lobbyists

[–] Daft_ish 14 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] elfin8er 11 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Then I guess bob's not affording lobbyists then.

[–] Daft_ish 7 points 5 months ago

Food either, considering.

[–] PunnyName 39 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Ava then we get to party even more money at the pump when they feel like charging more. Despite us subsidizing them.

So let's stop subsidizing oil.

[–] Daft_ish 9 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Lol, oil has made certain no one will go after them. Gas prices are the presidents responsibility, apparently. So even if you tried, once the raving lunatics catch wind that rolling coal will cost an extra 100 bucks they lose their God damn minds and you will lose at the polls.

[–] PunnyName 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Which is why we need to a) increase electric car and grid potential, to choke them out, and b) increase better public transit with mixed zoning for easy-to-use cities.

While these are definitely big, and by no means easy to accomplish, solutions, they will help us move away from a car centric society that is hamstringed by oil.

Also, maybe some eco terrorists can help, but I'll let them keep me out of the loop.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 5 months ago

But but but fudge rounds, muh taxes are paying for fudge rounds for poor people that's the problem hurr durr.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 5 months ago

Hey I'm sure if we find a reason to look hard enough there is a reason to kick down on Bob, or whatever reason the law needs. Shell makes JOBS, bob just ... ugh... works. Not real 'owner' energy bob.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 5 months ago (1 children)

But shell makes jobs for a million Bobs! And then Bobs are doing something useful for society! /s

[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 months ago

bob still needs those 1500 in food stamps while working 15h week... the system works, for a few...

[–] [email protected] 15 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It also bears noting that Shell is not a person

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

In Freedumbland Shell absolutely would be a person.

:(

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago

Legally speaking, leider ja. But we don't have to accept that framing just because it says so on the piece of American ~~toilet paper~~ legal parchment that is Citizens United

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago (4 children)

If Shell stops getting it from the government, they'll just raise prices for us to make up the difference. They won't be hitting their bottom line anytime soon

[–] UPGRAYEDD 43 points 5 months ago (1 children)

This is true, but it would help incentivise the country to move away from fossil fuels.

Also worth noting this would drive up the prices of nearly all goods as well since shipping costs would rise.

There are good incentives for fuel subsidizes, but the goverment has failed at having stipulations to gonwith the subsidizes.

Personally, i think they should nationalize the fuel production industry. No one should get rich from a natural resource, especially one that is destorying the planet. Even more so since they have known about it for 70+ years and have been trying to cover it up.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 months ago

Personally, i think they should nationalize the fuel production industry. No one should get rich from a natural resource, especially one that is destorying the planet. Even more so since they have known about it for 70+ years and have been trying to cover it up.

Absolutely! Every industry related to fossil fuels, be it fuel for vehicles, power production or even plastic manufacture and steel smelting, should be nationalized and then phased out as quickly as possible in favor of cleaner and otherwise less hazardous alternatives.

Natural resources, infrastructure and vital base components used in roughly everything should not be owned and controlled by under-regulated for profit entities who will never value long-term or even short term human survival higher than short term profits.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 5 months ago (1 children)

If they've been subsidised so much, the company should just be made a public entity rather than just stopping the funding.

[–] qaz 31 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The government should demand new shares in return for the subsidies. No subsidization without representation.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 months ago

Yep and if they want to continue to receive subsidies, they're going to have to continue to sell shares, eventually leading to either no more subsidies or complete governmental control of the entire industry. Preferably the latter.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 5 months ago

I thought Americans were all about free market. Other companies and alternatives will come in and undercut shell if that happens.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 5 months ago

They'll raise prices regardless. The government handouts are just extra profits for what is already one of the most profitable industries in the history of mankind.

[–] MedicPigBabySaver 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Fuck Bob, he's an ugly ass green. I like the pretty yellow head instead.

[–] Daft_ish 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Did you know shell has a pretty yellow head because it is morally superior?

[–] MedicPigBabySaver 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

At least it's not the ugly orange face of Trump the Cheeto chimp.

[–] Daft_ish 1 points 5 months ago

Isn't it deranged that the GOPs presidential candidate paints his face orange... like he chooses to do this.