this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2024
281 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

59446 readers
4717 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 84 points 6 months ago (5 children)

And all it took was scapegoating a reviewer kid. (Don't look at the stock prices before that, please)

[–] [email protected] 42 points 6 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 38 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Fisker found out Brownless got the car from an outside source

That typo is hilarious

[–] TrickDacy 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] haulyard 38 points 6 months ago

Marques Brownlee is actually, rather brown.

[–] slaacaa 28 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

“The company is Fisker's second automotive startup. His previous startup, Fisker Automotive, filed for bankruptcy protection in 2013. Fisker launched his second automotive company in 2016.”

Actual picture of investors of the second company: 🤡

[–] Ejh3k 39 points 6 months ago (4 children)

And I didn't really think his review was all that scathing.

[–] Zron 27 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Marques is actually very balanced even in his critical reviews.

Even with the Humane AI pin, he did commend them on their physical build quality, even if the rest of the device was practically useless, he never outright said that, just points out the flaws.

Although I do wonder sometimes how much he tries to hard to be balanced, as some products, especially cars due to the price, don’t deserve kind treatment for noticeable faults.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The video's title "worst car ever reviewed" was not as balanced though :D

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 months ago

I guess. But as long as it's actually true and he actually believes that, I see no real issue with it.

[–] teejay 15 points 6 months ago

It wasn't. Fisker's shitty response is what made it an even bigger deal.

[–] pastabatman 3 points 6 months ago

I agree, but to be fair the title was a little clickbaity and was seen by a whole lot of people who didn't watch the video and just scrolled past it.

[–] Furbag 1 points 6 months ago

It wasn't really. It certainly didn't make me want to go spend $70k for one, but I wouldn't have entirely dismissed the brand as a whole for one of their first forays into both auto engineering and EV production. If I got one for free, I'd drive it. By the time I need a new car, it would have been worth looking into again.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah... if the car wasn't shit, the review would have been more positive. It's not the reviewer's fault the car sucks lol

[–] ours 3 points 6 months ago

In this case yes but as an example Linus Tech Tips has put companies in trouble by botching their reviews: using the wrong GPU with a prototype cooler (despite being provided the GPU...) and not removing the protective film on a gaming mouse.

[–] EncryptKeeper 14 points 6 months ago (2 children)

30 year olds are kids now? This is big

[–] johannesvanderwhales 10 points 6 months ago

Well tbf a lot of people have been following him since he actually was a kid. He started the channel when he was in high school.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

Ask the Fisker technician who called the guy who rented out the EV to Browlee.